Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Girl Guides are now GIRL ONLY!

1000 replies

Iamwhoiamwhoareyou · 02/12/2025 14:41

Following April's supreme court ruling, the Girl Guides have FINALLY made a statement and will remain GIRLS ONLY - Finally closing the door on admitting trans members or allowing BOYS to invade female only spaces/camp (which, would be done without informing parents that their daughter would be sharing a room with a biological male!) - I have a previous post in feminism chat for anyone wanting to read the previous thread on this

EMAIL RECEIVED HOT OFF THE PRESS 5 MIN AGO -

As the parent of a young member in Girlguiding, following April’s Supreme Court decision relating to sex and gender, we wanted to give you an update. Many organisations across the country have been facing complex decisions about what it means for girls and women and for the wider communities affected, including us.

Girlguiding’s governing charity documents set out that the membership and people who benefit from our organisation are girls and women. In April, the Supreme Court ruled that girls and women are defined in the Equality Act 2010 by their biological sex at birth.
Following detailed considerations, expert legal advice and input from senior members, young members and our Council, Girlguiding’s Board of Trustees has made the difficult decision that Girlguiding must change Girlguiding must change, following the Supreme Court’s ruling.

From today, 2 December, it is with a heavy heart that we are announcing trans girls and young women will no longer be able to join Girlguiding. This is a decision we would have preferred not to make, and we know that this may be upsetting for members of our community.

There will be no immediate changes for current young members but more information will be shared next week.

Most adult roles, including unit helpers, district helpers and administrative support, are already open to all, so we are confident that no volunteers will have to leave the organisation.

Girlguiding believes strongly in our value of inclusion, and we will continue to support young people and adults in marginalised groups. Over the next few months, we'll explore opportunities to champion this value and actively support young people who need us.

You can find our full statement and updated policy on our website.

We are proud to be the UK’s largest youth organisation dedicated to girls and is focused on creating an equal world for girls and young women. For over 100 years, we have been a welcoming space for all girls to have new experiences, support their communities, build friendships and grow their confidence.

While Girlguiding may feel a little different going forward, these core aims and principles will always be the same. We remain committed to treating everyone with dignity and respect, particularly those from marginalised groups that have felt the biggest impact of this decision.

If you have any immediate questions, we have our special support team in place, to give volunteers, parents and carers the best support we can. We are asking Girlguiding HQ, trading and country/region staff to refer any volunteer or parent who has questions about this announcement. Details below.

Contact [email protected] or 020 7532 3970
All calls/emails will be confidential, and the service will be open 24hrs, 7 days a week.
Find out more, including how this team will handle personal data.

Denise Wilson (Chair of Trustees), Felicity Oswald (CEO) and Tracy Foster (Chief Guide)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
CohensDiamondTeeth · 02/12/2025 23:28

SolidMam · 02/12/2025 23:23

The biology ideology is scary. No, the other girls are not "validation resources". They are her friends.

Perhaps they will join Scouts, or whichever the age appropriate group for your child, instead of GG too.

I'm not sure if you missed my question above so I'll just copy it in below, the thread is moving quite fast

"How old is your child, and at what age did you start using female pronouns etc if you don't mind me asking?"

Ihatetomatoes · 02/12/2025 23:28

Arran2024 · 02/12/2025 23:19

Trans people certainly weren't joining the Brownies when I was a member back in the day. In fact, nobody considered for a moment that a parent would enroll their son in the Brownies. He would have been shown the door if they had tried. What did all the trans kids and their parents do back then?

The social contagion wasn't around then. Kids were kids and learnt biology. No one can change sex. They can wear clothes they 'perceive' to belong to a particular sex, change names, wear dangly earrings and swish their long hair but they cannot change the DNA in their body. They will always be the sex they were born as, people are no longer wanting to play pretend. Reality matters. Sex matters.

ThatBlackCat · 02/12/2025 23:28

Bloozie · 02/12/2025 23:22

Girls can join Beavers, Cubs and Scouts. Duke of Edinburgh is Co-Ed. There are no safeguarding issues within any of that.

On lots of levels, this decision is regressive and somewhat bewildering.

It is not 'regressive' for girls to have just one single sex space. What is regressive is saying girls should have no space all for themselves. That is misogynist and offensive.

Namelessnelly · 02/12/2025 23:28

SolidMam · 02/12/2025 23:23

The biology ideology is scary. No, the other girls are not "validation resources". They are her friends.

but won’t that be a shock when they find out he’s really a boy? I presume you haven’t told them. What happens when puberty hits? How do you explain that he won’t develop in the same way? They’ll realise he’s a boy and then the shit will hit the fan There are going to be a lot of upset children. And that, again, is on you.

Helleofabore · 02/12/2025 23:29

SolidMam · 02/12/2025 23:15

She has been my "daughter" now for longer than she was my "son". If she hits puberty and feels very different and realises she's a boy after all, then great I'll support that too. Because guess what - our identities aren't fixed. I love my child and want her to be supported in who she IS not feel othered for who she isn't. 40% of trans adults have attempted suicide at least once - hopefully, by supporting my child, she won't become a statistic. Feels very strange - and quite hurtful - to have you deliberately misidentify her. As for single sex spaces, I think Brownies and guides could do well for being kinder and more inclusive, that's all.

Your male child cannot change sex and single sex provisions are not based on ‘identities’.

You can express how hurt you are that people don’t join you in using female language for your child. That has been purely your choice to use female language for a male child. However, it is not kind of you to expect anyone else to act as if your belief that your child has changed sex is materially real or to change their language usage to suit your beliefs.

I also suggest you start looking deeply into any suicide statistics because perhaps you have missed the studies that show that poor mental health continues with transition. Perhaps you are only getting part of the facts about suicide rates and need to look further.

CautiousLurker2 · 02/12/2025 23:29

Bloozie · 02/12/2025 23:22

Girls can join Beavers, Cubs and Scouts. Duke of Edinburgh is Co-Ed. There are no safeguarding issues within any of that.

On lots of levels, this decision is regressive and somewhat bewildering.

FFS. Yes, girls can join in with boys and do any and all of those activities… but they are also entitled to do other activities in a single-sex environment should they wish to do so. Just as boys are free to do so in Boys Brigade and similar.

GGUK is a SINGLE SEX organisation in it legal constitution. It should never have allowed boys, however they identify to join.

It owes a deep and sincere apology to the fragile boys it allowed to join and in colluding in the illusion they were girls, and it owes an additional apology to any girl it has gaslit into having to accept a boy in their single sexed space. It also owes an apology to all the girls who were excluded from joining for religious or cultural reasons because their families understand that people cannot change sex and that there were boys present, meaning that that they could not join.

ThatBlackCat · 02/12/2025 23:29

SolidMam · 02/12/2025 23:23

The biology ideology is scary. No, the other girls are not "validation resources". They are her friends.

Biology is reality. It is the reason women have been systematically oppressed. What is scary is the misogynistic Mens Rights trans ideology and the parents who go along with it.

ADHDHDHDHD · 02/12/2025 23:30

Not read the full thread.
but I am VERY pleased to receive this email.

every single survey GG has ever emailed out- I have added in to my reply -how on earth can they accept male children at camp and adequately safeguard all the children? As it’s basically impossible.

im sure they are only changing the policy because of the legal threat but id like to think I wasn’t the only parent complaining.

I wish I’d had the courage to behind the legal case. Well done that mum.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 02/12/2025 23:32

CakeArse · 02/12/2025 23:21

Did anyone ask the boys, or was a boys institution just made thoughtlessly co-ed? I'm minded to think of the men in sheds thing where they realised men's mental health warranted a different approach so a single sex space was a good idea then in one town the wives decided they wanted to come. Just ill-thought and selfish.

It wasn’t made mixed single because of some mean , strident women insisting that the boys had to share. Scouts was failing due to low numbers and needed the girls to increase their numbers and funds. I read here earlier that Scouts actually reached out to GG and suggested a merger but were knocked back.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 02/12/2025 23:33

Bloozie · 02/12/2025 23:22

Girls can join Beavers, Cubs and Scouts. Duke of Edinburgh is Co-Ed. There are no safeguarding issues within any of that.

On lots of levels, this decision is regressive and somewhat bewildering.

What is bewildering about a single sex organisation remaining single sex and not being guilty of illegal sex discrimination?

Ihatetomatoes · 02/12/2025 23:33

PhilOPastry62 · 02/12/2025 16:15

I have a lot of sympathy for the trans-identifying boys who joined GirlGuiding having been encouraged to do so by the adults around them - e.g. family, and guide leaders. But it's not so much that they have to leave guides (which I quite see will be a wrench if they have friends and a social life there) but because they've been lied to and encouraged to believe that they can live their lives as though they were the opposite sex. Probably had their 'trans identity' concretised through social transition, making it far harder for their confusion to resolve as adolescence progresses, and making it far more likely they will be lifelong medical patients. The guide leaders who are now weeping and wailing about the organisation's trans-excluding updated policy really have not been doing those boys any favours.

The boys have been sold a lie. There is a ticking time bomb, those poor children have been fed lies. They should never have been told they can change sex, it's outrageous the lies told to children nowadays.

Helleofabore · 02/12/2025 23:34

SolidMam · 02/12/2025 23:23

The biology ideology is scary. No, the other girls are not "validation resources". They are her friends.

If no girl at Brownies was allowed to use male language for your male
child, there is little doubt that those female children were validation resources for your child.

If you are teaching female children not to trust their instinct that the person in front of them is male when they materially are male, you are reducing their ability to establish boundaries and understand consent.

How is that kind to female children?

WearyAuldWumman · 02/12/2025 23:37

CakeArse · 02/12/2025 23:25

Boys Brigade is co-ed in the UK!

Has the Boys' Brigade gone co-ed now? Not quite - it seems that the Girls' Association is a sub-group which sometimes has activities alongside the boys.

I've trawled through the website and it looks like it varies from group to group - some are still completely single sex.

https://boys-brigade.org.uk/girls-association/

The Girls' Brigade is still listed separately.

https://girls-brigade-scotland.org.uk/new-to-gbs/parent-information/why-gbs/

Girls' Association - The Boys' Brigade

We work with over 20,000 children and young people including some 1,800 girls through membership of The Girls’ Association. You can use our ‘Find a...

https://boys-brigade.org.uk/girls-association/

SternJoyousBeev2 · 02/12/2025 23:37

Bloozie · 02/12/2025 23:22

Girls can join Beavers, Cubs and Scouts. Duke of Edinburgh is Co-Ed. There are no safeguarding issues within any of that.

On lots of levels, this decision is regressive and somewhat bewildering.

Oh and there absolutely are safeguarding issues. Each of those organisation will deal with thousands of safeguarding incidents every year.

But no one here is saying that there can be no mixed sex organisations. They are fine and will have their own safeguarding policies (that on many occasions are not enforced). I am happy that there are lots of mixed sex organisations but why can’t there be this one particular single sex organisation that remains actually single sex instead of pretend single sex?

SternJoyousBeev2 · 02/12/2025 23:39

SolidMam · 02/12/2025 23:23

The biology ideology is scary. No, the other girls are not "validation resources". They are her friends.

Girls and boys can absolutely be friends. But girls should not be taught to ignore their innate knowledge and ability to recognise boys and men.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 02/12/2025 23:41

CakeArse · 02/12/2025 23:23

I have never in all my days, and there's been a lot, seen a Boys Brigade in the UK

Well in all my days I have seen plenty.

PyongyangKipperbang · 02/12/2025 23:42

CohensDiamondTeeth · 02/12/2025 22:08

You didn't answer my question, do you think that trans identifying people actually and literally change sex? Or is it a "polite" fiction you go along with to "be kind"?

I think you could do a lot worse than listen to some of the feminists who have been talking on this thread about the necessity of maintaining single sex spaces, in this case for young girls, because they make many excellent points.

One last big heaped plate of food for thought before you go. You know nice trans identifying males, many of us also know nice trans identifying males. That's all good and well. In reality even the nice trans identifying males are still male. They don't actually become women.

If we go along with a "polite" fiction like you, treating them as women in all areas, as I and others have said this leads to a number of things:

  1. Firstly it's not at all kind to position women and girls as emotional support Non Player Characters (NPCs) as emotional support animals for men and boys. Women and girls feelings matter too, and lots of us aren't happy about including men and boys in previously female only places or groups.

  2. It changes any previously female single sex whatever to mixed sex, so no female sport, health care, rape crisis centres, refuges, prisons, groups, awards, sponsorships, scholarships, schools, hospital wards... and so on and so on.
    2a) As an aside, did you know that a lot of those things previously single sex for males are still actually single sex? So still single sex for males - male sports (because what woman has a hope to win against top male athletes? Especially when they have gone through hormone "therapy" and surgeries which take a massive toll on their female bodies), prisons, and primogeniture laws which don't allow female children to inherit peerage and still only benefit male children. There's probably more that I'm forgetting right at this moment.

  3. Lots of girls and women will self exclude from things if men and boys are included, for a variety of reasons, none of which are bigoted. ND, conservative religions, previous sexual abuse, privacy and dignity etc. This is not conducive to inclusion of, or supportive of the really vulnerable women and girls out there.

  4. Speaking of schools, are you aware that there is an alarming amount of sexual assault and rape that happens in schools, as in peer on peer, male on female sexual violence? I'm sure you can see the immediate increased risk to girls that mixed sex toilets brought. Girls self excluded from toilets too because of this, holding it until they could get home and not drinking as much as they should. This is a further risk to their bodily health, UTI's and kidney infections result.
    Review of sexual abuse in schools and colleges - GOV.UK

  5. As well as increased risk of physical or sexual assault, hidden cameras, voyeuristic crimes and exposure are all increased risks too.

  6. Finally, if you let the nice trans identified males we all know and like/love into female single sex spaces, you have to also let in the not nice ones. It's not like the bad ones wander around with signs around their necks, so we can't tell the good from the bad until something unthinkable has happened. It's safer for women and girls if we just stick with the safeguarding we have now and keep all the men out, even the nice ones.

Google Isla Bryson, Karen White, and Barbie Kardashian if you want to see how this "be kind to the transwomen, I know some really nice ones!" thin end of the wedge kind of thinking goes at the other end. They and all the other men who would be a threat to women and girls are the ones you invite in when you handwave female single sex spaces to "be kind".

I could go on, I've gotten caught up in my thoughts so have surely missed many points I could have made, but I think you get the point.

I really do hope you chew over all this food for thought stuff. It's ok to realise that actually we might have a point. You can still support the trans identified people in your life, and they can still participate in all areas of life, without running roughshod over women and girl's rights and single sex spaces.

Brilliant post but....(sorry!)

I am not a monarchist at all but I love the late Queen Elizabeth because when Catherine was pregnant for the first time she changed the rules on primogeniture so that it was simply the first born who took the title not the first son. I was honestly disappointed when the baby was a boy (no offence George!), I was so hoping for the first girl in history to be the heir in her own right!

Helleofabore · 02/12/2025 23:43

Bloozie · 02/12/2025 23:22

Girls can join Beavers, Cubs and Scouts. Duke of Edinburgh is Co-Ed. There are no safeguarding issues within any of that.

On lots of levels, this decision is regressive and somewhat bewildering.

Because parents and the children involved have no expectation that these are single sex organisations.

GG leaders were told not to disclose that a child was male to parents or other GGs. Maybe you cannot see the safeguarding failure in that but it removes informed consent from being made. It means that a GG could be sleeping in accommodation with a male child (of any age as a minor) and showering with them.

Also, if female children are told that it is appropriate for them to be sharing accommodation and showers and changing rooms with people they know are male, it teaches them to have no boundaries. Because they have been told by adults who should know better that they should treat male children as if they are female when they are materially not.

This is a massive safeguarding failure.

EweProfessorSurnameDoctorProfessor · 02/12/2025 23:45

Biology ideology - what a bizarre concept

CohensDiamondTeeth · 02/12/2025 23:45

A poster making an emotional plea for what appears to be a very young "trans child", who holds biology up as an "ideology", rather than an inescapable reality, encouraged a male child to join a female single sex group making it mixed sex regardless of all the girls who were there because it was a single sex group, and quotes reckless misinformation about suicide? It's not sounding very much like feminism to me. It does sound like TRA talking points.

I mean it absolutely could true! I believe a PP account that there are parents out there with a 4 year old who say their child has a trans identity. I do believe parents like this exist, but I really don't think they're half as "kind" to their own child as they'd like to think they are.

Maddy70 · 02/12/2025 23:46

So does that mean that the boy scouts is now boys only?.

WearyAuldWumman · 02/12/2025 23:46

SternJoyousBeev2 · 02/12/2025 23:41

Well in all my days I have seen plenty.

I've just checked. In my area (Fife) there are currently three - plus one in Kinross, 7 miles away.

CautiousLurker2 · 02/12/2025 23:48

Maddy70 · 02/12/2025 23:46

So does that mean that the boy scouts is now boys only?.

There is no such organisation as Boy Scouts, Just Scouts UK, a mixed sex organisation since 1992.

HTH

Catiette · 02/12/2025 23:48

Maddy70 · 02/12/2025 23:46

So does that mean that the boy scouts is now boys only?.

There are loads of posts addressing this particular gotcha above. It's a massive thread - I've not read it all - but, FWIW, many of these pop up in very recent pages.

WearyAuldWumman · 02/12/2025 23:48

EweProfessorSurnameDoctorProfessor · 02/12/2025 23:45

Biology ideology - what a bizarre concept

Aye, but it makes a nice soundbite, I guess.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.