Cool. The indignant reply I expected. And yes, indignant, because it's now at " how dare you accuse me of lying" stage. I did not accuse you of lying.
My post was about trying to understand where you are coming from. Simple as that.
From your post above: "What your issue is, is that you have a standard argument that only works if I’m Christian. "
Yeah, that's not how debate works, as well you know.
Unless you truly do belief " the atheist mob" and " " the lefties" really are produced by some shadowy Soros funded training program. Although there are plenty of Fox annd GB news viewers who belief that, that's for sure.
To answer this question you ask: " Can you not conceive of someone recognising the importance of a religion in the culture of a people and the importance of a society having a culture to make it cohesive? All without agreeing with the theology"
Yes and no. For example, when I went to Egypt with a study tour, the religion and culture on ancient Egypt was a major part, but the cohesion of our study group did not depend on everyone understanding those things.
Understanding a specific bit of history is not a pre-requisite for cohesion in a group.
And now after all this, on page 38 or so we get a reason for all this from the OP.
The OP helps organise Remembrance day events, and prints the Hymn sheets.
Is that what this is all about OP. Are you fed up with singers mumbling away at your services, and you want the full weight of State education to swing into action, to make sure people can sing them ?
I have an idea. Can't you just organise a few practice sessions beforehand ?
Or send youtube links of the hymns to the attendees before. These are the Hymns, would be good if you could be familiar with them.
Would that not be easier than having compulsory hymns for all in school ?
Could you not have mentioned in your very first post OP, that you print out song sheets ?