Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think all schools should teach children the old traditional hymns

1000 replies

Staringintothevoid616 · 23/11/2025 13:44

Just switching between channels and Songs of Praise came on. It was a run down of the most popular school hymns.complete with recorders It brought back many memories and how important communal singing is. It doesn’t matter what your religion is, everyone should know the most popular hymns as a way of uniting society.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
BartholemewTheCat · 25/11/2025 10:58

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 10:43

You can imagine whatever you like, in fact for many imagination is humanity’s connection to the divine

But I started the conversation in good faith, it was, predictably lept on by the usual cohort who get triggered everytime God/christianity is mentioned. I can’t help it if I find their reaction hilarious.

I believe you said at the start of the thread that you don’t have any religious affiliation but I can see that’s not true. I suspect you’d have had better discussion if you’d just been less of a twat, but you’ve been rude throughout the thread, claiming people are atheists when in fact, they just don’t see why their children should be forced to sing songs about a deity that isn’t real, with a large proportion of those who believe in it having caused real, historical and ongoing, harm to a great many people.

FWIW I love a hymn. I can’t abide religious zealots.

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 10:58

ilovesooty · 25/11/2025 10:55

So could you explain your question about Hamas yesterday in response to the article about Tommy Robinson and Christianity?

It was a reference to the biased reporting of the BBC who used a son of a Hamas leader in one of its propaganda pieces (as the BBC eventually admitted) I thought it was an easy to get reference point

OP posts:
Christmascarrotjumper · 25/11/2025 11:00

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 10:54

Because hymns are not based on musical taste, their primary purpose is to set out a philosophical position.

In order for society to function at its best it needs shared language values, norms and rituals - usually embedded conveniently in a religion

In the UK Christianity has shaped the way society functions for well over 1500 years. So in order to understand its history, values, norms and rituals, as well as its impact on all the arts and language understanding Christianity well is vital.

hymns are easy ways to summarise the main points of Christianity.

You don’t need to believe in the theology of Christianity to understand these points.

I don't know why you keep saying this. Of course hymns are based upon musical taste. They were written according to the tastes of their time.

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 11:00

BartholemewTheCat · 25/11/2025 10:58

I believe you said at the start of the thread that you don’t have any religious affiliation but I can see that’s not true. I suspect you’d have had better discussion if you’d just been less of a twat, but you’ve been rude throughout the thread, claiming people are atheists when in fact, they just don’t see why their children should be forced to sing songs about a deity that isn’t real, with a large proportion of those who believe in it having caused real, historical and ongoing, harm to a great many people.

FWIW I love a hymn. I can’t abide religious zealots.

I believe I said I wasn’t Christian. So as well as calling me Misogynistic names, you have also misrepresented what I said. Is there a reason you did either of those two things?

OP posts:
Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 11:02

Christmascarrotjumper · 25/11/2025 11:00

I don't know why you keep saying this. Of course hymns are based upon musical taste. They were written according to the tastes of their time.

im confused here, one poster says I haven’t answered a question raised multiple times, then when I answer it I’m accused of keep saying the answer. It’s like some weird alternate universe

OP posts:
Christmascarrotjumper · 25/11/2025 11:03

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 11:02

im confused here, one poster says I haven’t answered a question raised multiple times, then when I answer it I’m accused of keep saying the answer. It’s like some weird alternate universe

Because nobody asked you this! You keep repeating it, but it's not an answer to anything! You're just obtuse.

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 11:05

Christmascarrotjumper · 25/11/2025 11:03

Because nobody asked you this! You keep repeating it, but it's not an answer to anything! You're just obtuse.

Well I was responding to a question raised by a poster, ie I was asked this. Is answering a question now “obtuse”?

OP posts:
PurpleThistle7 · 25/11/2025 11:13

Thank you for answering. We just disagree on a fundamental level. Which is fine! Luckily we have the right to do that. And I have the right to raise my kids as I see fit. As do you.

For clarity I think everything you say should be avoided. Countries that rely on a common religion to force conformity aren’t places I want to live. They tend to be quite unsafe for minorities of any sort.

ilovesooty · 25/11/2025 11:14

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 10:58

It was a reference to the biased reporting of the BBC who used a son of a Hamas leader in one of its propaganda pieces (as the BBC eventually admitted) I thought it was an easy to get reference point

Thank you.

5128gap · 25/11/2025 11:24

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 10:54

Because hymns are not based on musical taste, their primary purpose is to set out a philosophical position.

In order for society to function at its best it needs shared language values, norms and rituals - usually embedded conveniently in a religion

In the UK Christianity has shaped the way society functions for well over 1500 years. So in order to understand its history, values, norms and rituals, as well as its impact on all the arts and language understanding Christianity well is vital.

hymns are easy ways to summarise the main points of Christianity.

You don’t need to believe in the theology of Christianity to understand these points.

Nonsense.
The best way to understand Christianity and its impact on our society is to teach this in a clear objective way that begins "some people believe..." and goes on to describe those beliefs and provides examples of the impact the beliefs have had on society.
This should then be followed with "And other people believe..." with an outline of other major faiths, and the beliefs of those who do not support organised religion.
Singing hymns is an exceptionally poor learning tool.
For one thing, the language used is often archaic and open to misunderstanding. For another they contain very little information, typically confining themselves to repetitive words of praise for God, or the use of symbolic language that confuses rather than enlightens.
Please tell me what I am to understand about Christianity and its impact on our society from Singing "Glorious things of thee are spoken, Zion city of our God" or "Bring me my bow of burning gold, bring me my arrows of desire" or "When I tread the verge of Jordan, bid my anxious fears subside"?
I'm sure someone else with a greater knowledge probably could tell me. But it would be a very circuitous route when a simple history lesson would suffice.

MrsSkylerWhite · 25/11/2025 11:35

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 10:57

But Christianity is true, it is true in the fact that it has shaped UK society, its language, its arts, its rituals, norms snd values, its laws etc for over 1500 years. To understand these things you need a very good understanding of Christianity

Whether you believe it’s theology is true is an entirely different point

As a 61 year old white British atheist, I’ve managed very well indeed without a good understanding of Christianity.

Toetouchingtitties · 25/11/2025 11:43

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 11:00

I believe I said I wasn’t Christian. So as well as calling me Misogynistic names, you have also misrepresented what I said. Is there a reason you did either of those two things?

Throughout this whole thread, you’ve misrepresented what others have said - myself included. Why have you done that?

ilovesooty · 25/11/2025 12:26

Toetouchingtitties · 25/11/2025 11:43

Throughout this whole thread, you’ve misrepresented what others have said - myself included. Why have you done that?

And accused other people of gaslighting and bullying and referred to them in condescending terms.

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 12:30

Toetouchingtitties · 25/11/2025 11:43

Throughout this whole thread, you’ve misrepresented what others have said - myself included. Why have you done that?

Where have I done that? Can you point out specific examples? Do you accept you misrepresented what I had said and used vile misogynistic terminology to describe me?

OP posts:
Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 12:32

ilovesooty · 25/11/2025 12:26

And accused other people of gaslighting and bullying and referred to them in condescending terms.

Have you got anything useful to add Sooty or you just going to keep harping on and on and on with ad hominem comments?

OP posts:
Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 12:33

MrsSkylerWhite · 25/11/2025 11:35

As a 61 year old white British atheist, I’ve managed very well indeed without a good understanding of Christianity.

Guess you’ll never know if things could have gone even better with a good understanding of Christianity

OP posts:
pointythings · 25/11/2025 12:36

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 12:32

Have you got anything useful to add Sooty or you just going to keep harping on and on and on with ad hominem comments?

It's a little rich for you to accuse people of ad hominems. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. I do believe that's a Christian thing.

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 12:38

5128gap · 25/11/2025 11:24

Nonsense.
The best way to understand Christianity and its impact on our society is to teach this in a clear objective way that begins "some people believe..." and goes on to describe those beliefs and provides examples of the impact the beliefs have had on society.
This should then be followed with "And other people believe..." with an outline of other major faiths, and the beliefs of those who do not support organised religion.
Singing hymns is an exceptionally poor learning tool.
For one thing, the language used is often archaic and open to misunderstanding. For another they contain very little information, typically confining themselves to repetitive words of praise for God, or the use of symbolic language that confuses rather than enlightens.
Please tell me what I am to understand about Christianity and its impact on our society from Singing "Glorious things of thee are spoken, Zion city of our God" or "Bring me my bow of burning gold, bring me my arrows of desire" or "When I tread the verge of Jordan, bid my anxious fears subside"?
I'm sure someone else with a greater knowledge probably could tell me. But it would be a very circuitous route when a simple history lesson would suffice.

Well when I read the words “bring me my bow of burning gold bring me my arrows of desire” it took down a lot of research alleys and opened up a hell of a lot of knowledge about 18th century non conformist religion. If you want to delve deeper you could read Peter Ackroyds Blake biography to set this out very clearly if you were asking a serious question about the line

OP posts:
HelenaWaiting · 25/11/2025 12:38

This thread is the most batshit crazy I have ever read. Including the one about the spiders' bits touching the washing.

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 12:39

pointythings · 25/11/2025 12:36

It's a little rich for you to accuse people of ad hominems. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. I do believe that's a Christian thing.

I thought I’d try and connect by using some of the same communication methods😀

OP posts:
godmum56 · 25/11/2025 12:40

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 12:38

Well when I read the words “bring me my bow of burning gold bring me my arrows of desire” it took down a lot of research alleys and opened up a hell of a lot of knowledge about 18th century non conformist religion. If you want to delve deeper you could read Peter Ackroyds Blake biography to set this out very clearly if you were asking a serious question about the line

did your research get you to the Merchant Navy?

RedTagAlan · 25/11/2025 12:51

ilovesooty · 25/11/2025 11:14

Thank you.

Yeah. Gaslighting with a whataboutism.

So when presented with a BBC article containing data that contradicted OP's data, the reaction is to say " BBC ? Whatabout the Hamas thing ?. Gaslighting to make the poster ( or audience) doubt the evidence presented, rather than address the data in the BBC article.

Reading through the new posts, I see the OP accusing others of gaslighting, when they were not.

Moglet4 · 25/11/2025 12:58

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 08:43

You’re approximately the 84th person to role this out on this thread,, the comment is equally as ridiculous as the first time it was made and dealt with.

id love to know which “Freak out at the mention of Christianity” handbook this was advised in as a good comment

The poster specifically said that particular hymn should be mandatory so it was hardly plucked out of nowhere! You’re right that it’s not the only one that’s potentially problematic, though. ‘Onward Christian Soldiers’ would also be highly inappropriate in a school of mixed religions and races, ‘The fountain full of blood’ probably would go down like a lead balloon too. That said, I would love to hear my kids singing ‘When a knight won his spurs’ or the hymns that come from shared theology such as ‘You shall go out with joy’

Moglet4 · 25/11/2025 13:00

HelenaWaiting · 25/11/2025 12:38

This thread is the most batshit crazy I have ever read. Including the one about the spiders' bits touching the washing.

🤣

Staringintothevoid616 · 25/11/2025 13:20

RedTagAlan · 25/11/2025 12:51

Yeah. Gaslighting with a whataboutism.

So when presented with a BBC article containing data that contradicted OP's data, the reaction is to say " BBC ? Whatabout the Hamas thing ?. Gaslighting to make the poster ( or audience) doubt the evidence presented, rather than address the data in the BBC article.

Reading through the new posts, I see the OP accusing others of gaslighting, when they were not.

I don’t think it’s controversial to question the validity of using the BBC to illustrate a point they have been clearly shown to be very biased - it’s quite topical think there’s even been questions asked in Parliament about it. Always question sources

And yes certain posters have been trying to gaslight me. I suggest youre a bit more objective. Do you work for the BBC?

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.