Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To expect Sunday Dinner as the agreement?

1000 replies

TipJarTroubadours · 01/11/2025 15:56

Small details changed but the short of it is:

  1. We allow people to stay in self contained accommodation for 'free'
  2. The only 'cost' is attendance to Sunday dinner
  3. Aibu to refuse to let someone stay (or charge them market rent) if they don't attend dinner

The long of it is

DH and I own a residential static caravan site. It has been in DH family a long time. It has great transport links to a major city.

We allow close family/friends to stay rent free whilst they attend uni in the city/start a new job. We have had 15 different people over the years, some for six months, the longest five years.

Currently house DS and nephew who are both at uni and DHs best friends daughter and her partner who has just started an apprenticeship. All four attend Sunday dinner, as have the 15 beforehand.

(For those that are interested, I cook the meal and then they take turns to make/buy a pudding and wash up (most goes in the dishwasher) I have had one with severe allergies who used to bring their own food, and one that was fussy so I used to make them beans on toast every Sunday. )

My sister's son has been living with us since September, I was very clear on the rules- it might seem odd but for a 10k saving a year I expect attendance at one meal a week.- they both knew about this.
Since starting he has attended one, preferring to go to the pub/gym/game on a Sunday. It has been raised with him and we have said if he doesn't attend then we will charge him rent (we have other uni students renting although they are all mature)

I have gone to my parents for half term and have just met my sister and told her the same. My parents and her think I am completely unreasonable to ask him to attend Sunday dinner, I think they are completely unreasonable to expect me to house him for free after agreeing to my rules ( there are costs involved for me, utilities etc plus not being able to rent it out)

I've said he has to attend tomorrow or I will bill them from now until Christmas and if it isn't paid will evict at Christmas.

Am I being unreasonable to expect my nephew to do what he agreed to in return for accommodation? (I don't think I am, even if expecting to attend dinner is unreasonable, he has agreed to the terms, he could have just rented halls)

OP posts:
BunnyLake · 01/11/2025 21:34

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 21:13

The poll is 50/50; clearly there are people whose perspectives align with the OP's.

Her mother's opinion is irrelevant because it's not her mother's family tradition. If mother wants to fund nephew's accommodations, let her do so.

I was asking the OP.

fromadistance2025 · 01/11/2025 21:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

And I imagine the young man didn't really think OP would impose the freakish toll, he probably imagined she would let it go as it's such a creepy and bizarre demand.

He's learning that the world is full of weird people who do shitty things and will use their privilege and money to move people around like toys for their amusement.

I hope he finds somewhere else to live, and quickly. Pretty much anything would be better than having to kowtow to this creepy demand, but he's young so he may take some time to realise that.

FOJN · 01/11/2025 21:35

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 01/11/2025 21:31

No she had not!

she said her in-laws did it and she was grateful for being able to live for free and save.

she has said why she’s continued with the tradition of offering free accommodation- but not explained why she’s made the dinners a condition of the free accommodation at all!

She hadn’t explained why they matter to her, just that it’s the deal and as a deal he should keep to it. Nothing as to what she gets from this, why she’s made cares about them, why she thinks it’s a good thing.

she must have a reason or else she’d let it go. you have presumed that “being an active member of the family” is the condition- and that this dinner on this evening is the only way they could do that. And have you missed that 2 of the young people currently living under these terms are not related to either her or her DH but the daughter of a friend of DHs - why do they need to pretend to be family?!

Why does she need to explain? She wasn't asking if people approved, she asked if she would be unreasonable to hold her nephew to the agreement he entered into with her BEFORE he moved in.

lalalapland · 01/11/2025 21:35

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 21:33

Or he could just pay the rent.

Maybe he should read this thread and start a go fund me to move out of the crazy house. We'll all contribute 🤣

Nestingbirds · 01/11/2025 21:35

What happens during these hideous dinners?? Picking out the eyes of baby rabbits? Burning small animals on the stake? Some other depraved routine? Bloody hell op. Just leave the kids alone.

Thelankyone · 01/11/2025 21:35

fromadistance2025 · 01/11/2025 21:31

OP gives me the absolute creeps. I keep imagining a Miss Haversham powdered face and a faint smell of lavender talcum powder, strange little dolls posed around the living room and a loudly ticking clock.

Someone upthread mentioned Tales of the Unexpected and I totally get that vibe from OP.

It’s creeping me out too. And I’ve a horrible feeling it’s real.

These young people being forced to attend this Sunday dinner every week , they don’t have to eat, but need to be there and then wash the dishes, every single Sunday, whilst the op makes happy small talk and pretends they are all happy, exhibiting huge amount of control over them as she’s making them do it for free accommodation.

it’s utterly disturbing,

TheSwarm · 01/11/2025 21:36

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 21:33

Or he could just pay the rent.

Or he could just tell her to piss off.

Lastfroginthebox · 01/11/2025 21:36

If I'd agreed to those conditions, I'm not sure I'd have understood that you really meant it! I'd probably assume you were joking and maybe even that it would be easier for you if I didn't come to dinner. I'd rather pay something in order to have my Sunday to myself rather than be forced to attend a dinner.

Cerezo · 01/11/2025 21:36

LaserPumpkin · 01/11/2025 21:34

Princess Margaret, surely? But also dead.

Quite right, schoolgirl error there.

KitchenSinkLlama · 01/11/2025 21:36

I can’t begin to imagine why you would do this. Either kindly offer the accommodation without strings, or rent it out commercially. What you are doing OP is extremely odd at best.

fromadistance2025 · 01/11/2025 21:36

lalalapland · 01/11/2025 21:35

Maybe he should read this thread and start a go fund me to move out of the crazy house. We'll all contribute 🤣

I absolutely would!

Possiges · 01/11/2025 21:36

Urgh you’re just so awful I can’t even comprehend. So weird and controlling.

WeeGeeBored · 01/11/2025 21:36

Has op answered the question about the reason for this requirement?

lalalapland · 01/11/2025 21:36

FOJN · 01/11/2025 21:35

Why does she need to explain? She wasn't asking if people approved, she asked if she would be unreasonable to hold her nephew to the agreement he entered into with her BEFORE he moved in.

And the majority think the agreement was unreasonable in the first place. But she refuses to accept that, so why ask the questions?

Thelankyone · 01/11/2025 21:37

FOJN · 01/11/2025 21:35

Why does she need to explain? She wasn't asking if people approved, she asked if she would be unreasonable to hold her nephew to the agreement he entered into with her BEFORE he moved in.

Well her own mother and sister thinks shes unreasonable. So..

DingDongJingle · 01/11/2025 21:37

WeeGeeBored · 01/11/2025 21:36

Has op answered the question about the reason for this requirement?

No reason, just because she wants to!

BunnyLake · 01/11/2025 21:37

FOJN · 01/11/2025 21:32

People are unable to address the question asked and are projecting their own issues onto the OP's situation. This is probably one of the most batshit threads I've seen on Mumsnet. OP won't give the mob a satisfactory explanation for the agreement she made with her nephew so they've filled in the gaps with bullying speculation. You'd think mature adults would be ashamed of behaving so badly but apparently not.

She's abusive, coercive, a shit cook, poor company, can't make friends and her caravans are not fit to be rented on the open market. Batshit.

Not as batshit as giving your nephew the ultimatum of having dinner every Sunday or else.

HappiestSleeping · 01/11/2025 21:38

TipJarTroubadours · 01/11/2025 20:57

I couldn't stay away!

This is basically it.
I don't see how it is controlling to tell someone up front what the deal is. If you are happy to attend a meal once a week, I am happy to host you. For the other 6 days (and most of the 7th) you can do as you please. How is this gaslighting/abusive/controlling.

Nephew is not destitute, I was very clear what the deal was. I have talked more with my family and it is clear he has the funds similar to other uni students.

I am not doing this for any notion of kindness or recognition (I don't understand the posts about doing it to look like a happy family - who would be looking?) it isn't a gift, a gift is without strings. It is an offer.

The catty remarks about the caravans being unable to rent on the open market are way off- it is a choice we have made, I am aware of our privilege.

It isn't that I don't care about him, I just believe that as adults we have choices and linked consequences.

Please may I come and live rent free in exchange for attending a free meal once a week?

fromadistance2025 · 01/11/2025 21:38

Thelankyone · 01/11/2025 21:35

It’s creeping me out too. And I’ve a horrible feeling it’s real.

These young people being forced to attend this Sunday dinner every week , they don’t have to eat, but need to be there and then wash the dishes, every single Sunday, whilst the op makes happy small talk and pretends they are all happy, exhibiting huge amount of control over them as she’s making them do it for free accommodation.

it’s utterly disturbing,

The whole thing, OPs responses, her initial question, the scenario you've just evoked, it really makes my skin crawl.

TheSwarm · 01/11/2025 21:38

BunnyLake · 01/11/2025 21:37

Not as batshit as giving your nephew the ultimatum of having dinner every Sunday or else.

It's literally the plot of a shitty straight to video horror movie.

WeeGeeBored · 01/11/2025 21:39

is Op child free? Is that what this is about?

I am childfree myself and can’t imagine anything worse than having all those people to dinner.

Pregnancyquestion · 01/11/2025 21:39

I feel like this isn’t as weird as everyone is making out. Asking your relatives to pay rent with their company once a week for a family Sunday dinner is not the usual set up, but it’s hardly that unusual.

I personally would’ve bitten my aunts hand off if she offered me this when I was a student. I’d have turned up half drunk and hungover mind you.

It’s your rules, and I think you’re doubling down because he’s refused to come to so many and now it’s the principle

Thelankyone · 01/11/2025 21:39

HappiestSleeping · 01/11/2025 21:38

Please may I come and live rent free in exchange for attending a free meal once a week?

I’ve a funny feeling unless you’re really in a dire situation you’d go once, wash the dishes and not want to go again either, like her nephew,

Whaleandsnail6 · 01/11/2025 21:39

No5ChalksRoad · 01/11/2025 21:21

She HAS told us. Only the incredibly thick don't get it at this point, or are trying to not get it.

It's a family tradition started by her in-laws many years ago, to forego significant income and instead use their properties to give young family members a leg up - IF the young people seemed interested in being active members of the family.

Why that is so difficult to comprehend is a mystery. There is value to community, to the village, to the extended family. Some people consider it worthwhile to have a weekly (or more frequent) meal gathering to foster those ties. Instead of everyone eating takeaway in their rooms while scrolling. Her husband's family established this ehos and she and her spouse are trying to continue it, and broadening the offer to her side of the family.

The discipline of keeping a weekly commitment, of getting outside of one's shell and expressing an interest in others, of helping to prepare and clean up a convivial meal, are things whose value shouldn't need to be explained. People pretending not to understand this are just trying to have a go at the OP.

I don't disagree with your 3rd paragraph about the importance of family and community. But I don't agree the way to do this is by "forced" (I know he could pay or live elsewhere but if he wants to remain in the accommodation that he is settled in he has to attend) family meal

Why can he not express interest in spending time with others, develop family relationships and be an active member of the family a different way if he doesn't want the meal?

Why can't he help out around the house or grounds? Come round for a cup of tea a different day? He could be an active member of the family and continue family relationship in other ways.

This meal way runs the risk of him either moving out and never speaking to op again or suffering through the family meals for the next 3 years, hating them and deciding hes never coming to a family meal again, whereas if there was more "choice" in attending, he may grow to love them and continue to come many years after. Sometimes the more you push, the more people pull away

Purplevioletblu · 01/11/2025 21:40

I hate how some people with money think they can control situations and and buy people, yuck. Sorry op this would make me feel uncomfortable. Please make your own life instead of forcing your traditions on people.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread