Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Fans banned from match

1000 replies

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/10/2025 20:19

WTAF?!

https://news.sky.com/story/maccabi-tel-aviv-fans-will-not-be-allowed-to-attend-aston-villa-match-amid-safety-concerns-13451240

Maccabi Tel Aviv fans banned due to safety concerns AGAINST them?

Since when is it ok to victim blame and penalise people who have done nothing wrong? Surely the right course of action would be either to ban ALL fans of both sides or better police the event?

So are Jews not welcome at sports games now? Because some people are racist bullies?

I genuinely can’t believe this has been allowed. Where does it end? Can Jews no longer safely access society? What if the risk is high elsewhere, will they be banned then?

What do you think? AIBU to think this is discriminatory and a slippery slope?

Maccabi Tel Aviv fans will not be allowed to attend Aston Villa match amid safety concerns

Police say the decision is based partly on what happened in Amsterdam last year, when Israeli fans attending a match against Ajax were targets of antisemitic attacks.

https://news.sky.com/story/maccabi-tel-aviv-fans-will-not-be-allowed-to-attend-aston-villa-match-amid-safety-concerns-13451240

OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
SunnySideDeepDown · 16/10/2025 20:51

Popopopopol · 16/10/2025 20:50

I understand where you’re coming from but similarly, the police do sometimes need to be pragmatic.

Wouldn’t pragmatism be closing the game to ALL fans?

OP posts:
KTheGrey · 16/10/2025 20:52

Anyway the solution is that nobody goes. Sauce for the goose - and a small sacrifice for The (omni) Cause.

nomas · 16/10/2025 20:53

KTheGrey · 16/10/2025 20:50

No the Israelis have gone back to Israel. It’s Hamas who are now shooting Palestinians. Look at the news.

You should look at the news, Israel killed 6 Palestinians on Tuesday AFTER the ceasefire.

BluntPlumHam · 16/10/2025 20:54

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/10/2025 20:51

Wouldn’t pragmatism be closing the game to ALL fans?

No because it’s the Macabi fans that are the issue. They’re unable to conduct themselves in a decent manner when in public. It’s got nothing to do with it being an Israeli team it’s just that they have a terrible reputation for inciting hate and violence wherever they go. Amsterdam 2024 is a recent example.

Jc2001 · 16/10/2025 20:55

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 16/10/2025 20:41

Not fact.

Then why has ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu for war crimes and crimes against humanity?

steamingin · 16/10/2025 20:55

from the night before the match onwards, hardline supporters of Maccabi Tel Aviv – a club with a reputation for racism and hooliganism among some of its fans – had torn down a Palestinian flag from the facade of a building and burned it, attacked one taxi with their belts, and vandalised others. Among the deplorable chants they saw fit to shout on the streets of Amsterdam, home to a large Muslim community, were: “Let the IDF [Israeli army] win, we will fuck the Arabs”, “Fuck you Palestine” and “Why is there no school in Gaza? There are no children left there.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/nov/16/amsterdam-violence-maccabi-tel-aviv-far-right

They sound lovely. Completely correct that they are banned. Games have been played with fans banned for a lot less.

HewasH2O · 16/10/2025 20:56

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/10/2025 20:51

Wouldn’t pragmatism be closing the game to ALL fans?

If the Villa fans can attend the match they will be contained within the stadium & any of the other fans will be outside if they decide to travel. If all fans are banned, troublemakers will all still attend & be in a more dangerous situation outside of the stadium. From a risk & security perspective it makes most sense to allow the locals to attend.

HarbourClankCat · 16/10/2025 20:59

It’s about whether the venue and area around it (including blue light emergency services) can put adequate safety measures in place and enough resources to keep people safe - particularly from terrorism, serious violence.

The people who make these recommendations are not interested in
politics beyond it’s potential affects on public safety.

KTheGrey · 16/10/2025 21:01

nomas · 16/10/2025 20:53

You should look at the news, Israel killed 6 Palestinians on Tuesday AFTER the ceasefire.

Edited

I do look at the news. I saw it.

I also note France’s ‘concern’ at thirty three extra judicial shootings by Hamas recorded officially and separately pleas from inside Palestine saying that Hamas are killing hundreds including women and children. Their own people.

ThatGladTiger · 16/10/2025 21:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CarlaLemarchant · 16/10/2025 21:06

It’s a sensible decision that protects those who reside in the local area, and those that will be attending the match for the football.

It’s not a decision by Aston Villa, it’s by the Safety Advisory Group who have informed the club and UEFA. It’s a policing decision and a good one.

Alittlefeedbackwouldbenice · 16/10/2025 21:08

It's not banning Jews, it's banning fans of that particular team.

And fans of that particular team are being banned because they specifically have a bad reputation for hooliganism, and because of the tensions of them being from a country that's committed genocide recently.

Any Jewish fans of Aston villa are more than welcome to attend.

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/10/2025 21:08

CarlaLemarchant · 16/10/2025 21:06

It’s a sensible decision that protects those who reside in the local area, and those that will be attending the match for the football.

It’s not a decision by Aston Villa, it’s by the Safety Advisory Group who have informed the club and UEFA. It’s a policing decision and a good one.

Good decision in YOUR opinion. Not in mine. In my opinion, it’s discriminatory.

OP posts:
Craftysue · 16/10/2025 21:09

They caused a lot of trouble and caused a lot of damage at Ajax last season. As a season ticket holder I can't say I'm disappointed

Aphrodite89 · 16/10/2025 21:12

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/10/2025 21:08

Good decision in YOUR opinion. Not in mine. In my opinion, it’s discriminatory.

How is it discriminatory? Just in the last couple of months Marseille banned Ajax fans and Napoli banned Eintracht Frankfurt fans, so it's not like only Israeli clubs have had this kind of action taken. City authorities are perfectly entitled to act if they think there is a risk and given that Maccabi have a recent history of racist violence on European away trips, there's plenty of reason to believe they are a risk.

BluntPlumHam · 16/10/2025 21:13

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/10/2025 21:08

Good decision in YOUR opinion. Not in mine. In my opinion, it’s discriminatory.

Why are you deflecting from the issue at hand? Number of people have provided you with examples of them being complete hooligans yet you’re hellbent on making jt
about politics and discrimination. Why should they stop an entire match ? The teams are still playing. It’s the fans that have got themselves banned. In the U.K. we have football bans where individuals have been convicted of said related offences.

HarbourClankCat · 16/10/2025 21:15

CarlaLemarchant · 16/10/2025 21:06

It’s a sensible decision that protects those who reside in the local area, and those that will be attending the match for the football.

It’s not a decision by Aston Villa, it’s by the Safety Advisory Group who have informed the club and UEFA. It’s a policing decision and a good one.

Just a technicality but SAG are not decision making. They are advisory. They can make recommendations and people can choose to take them on board or not

Generally, however, it’s wise to take their thoughts on board.

Anthempart2 · 16/10/2025 21:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

The war is over. You’re living in the past.

CarlaLemarchant · 16/10/2025 21:16

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/10/2025 21:08

Good decision in YOUR opinion. Not in mine. In my opinion, it’s discriminatory.

So you would prefer the MTA fans descend on Birmingham and major disorder breaks out around the town centre, around the ground (a heavily residential area) and in various other pockets around the city? Maybe if it’s not on your doorstep you would prefer that. Would it be exciting for you?

The SAG haven’t taken this decision lightly. It’s to prevent disorder well beyond that of a normal football crowd.

CarlaLemarchant · 16/10/2025 21:18

HarbourClankCat · 16/10/2025 21:15

Just a technicality but SAG are not decision making. They are advisory. They can make recommendations and people can choose to take them on board or not

Generally, however, it’s wise to take their thoughts on board.

From Aston Villa:

Aston Villa can confirm the club has been informed that no away fans may attend the UEFA Europa League match with Maccabi Tel Aviv on Thursday, November 6, following an instruction from the Safety Advisory Group.

The Safety Advisory Group (SAG) are responsible for issuing safety certificates for every match at Villa Park, based on a number of physical and safety factors.

Following a meeting this afternoon, the SAG have formally written to the club and UEFA to advise no away fans will be permitted to attend Villa Park for this fixture.

West Midlands Police have advised the SAG that they have public safety concerns outside the stadium bowl and the ability to deal with any potential protests on the night.

The club are in continuous dialogue with Maccabi Tel Aviv and the local authorities throughout this ongoing process, with the safety of supporters attending the match and the safety of local residents at the forefront of any decision.

HarbourClankCat · 16/10/2025 21:21

SAG can’t make an instruction. I think AV may be trying to play with words a bit here. I have chaired a SAG so am somewhat au fait.

Biskieboo · 16/10/2025 21:21

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/10/2025 21:08

Good decision in YOUR opinion. Not in mine. In my opinion, it’s discriminatory.

Well of course it's discriminatory but last time I looked being discriminated against because you are a supporter of a particular football team, whose travelling supporters have a track record anti-Muslim violence, which is due to play a game in an area with a large Muslim population, at a time when tensions between Muslims and Jews is particularly high, funnily enough isn't against the Equalities Act. Tbh I refuse to believe that you could be so obtuse to be 'shocked' at this. To avoid the high likelihood of violence at the game they can either ban a few thousand MTA supporters, or ban them plus fifty thousand AV supporters too. It's a perfectly proportionate response of a sort that is used fairly often.

BerryTwister · 16/10/2025 21:23

OP have you ever been to a football match?

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/10/2025 21:24

CarlaLemarchant · 16/10/2025 21:16

So you would prefer the MTA fans descend on Birmingham and major disorder breaks out around the town centre, around the ground (a heavily residential area) and in various other pockets around the city? Maybe if it’s not on your doorstep you would prefer that. Would it be exciting for you?

The SAG haven’t taken this decision lightly. It’s to prevent disorder well beyond that of a normal football crowd.

“Maybe if it’s not on your doorstep you would prefer that. Would it be exciting for you?”

Excuse me?

OP posts:
Custardcream84 · 16/10/2025 21:24

Anthempart2 · 16/10/2025 21:16

The war is over. You’re living in the past.

This is why people find pro Israelis abominable. They just want to wash their hands and forget and act like nothing happened but we will never forget. The world is disgusted and the tide has turned. You don’t get to forget you committed a genocide.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.