It really isn't, if you were to switch it and say the females are using the men like unpaid sex workers, the females wouldn't feel so defensive.
Free speech and all that, it is a subject that seems to be difficult to have.
We know how it works across the board, and how the terminology is applied regarding different age groups and different social classes. The young tend to use it as a term for promiscuous sex and the older tend to use it an an empowering means of enjoying sex. The younger group has enabled the older group to latch onto the term as something very normal and free spirited, but their use of the word can be very different.
It is even viewed as some kind of innocent sport which to critisise would involve pearl clutching archaic idiots.
When did sex become so devalued, we know how standards have been encouraged to decline through porn and the pandering of males, by governments to keep men entertained, but this lowering of moral standards has done little for women on a wider note.
I do really feel sorry for the younger females, they are conditioned to expect very little from men, even staying to rear the young, I mean the state can become responsible for that can't they as the men are applauded and normalised for having numerous women.
The older age bracket, that use this term are more secretive, they are usually covert relationships and many of them have decided that to remain friends and keep on the periferies of someone's life means they are more respected within the FWB agreement, which in the long run ends up hurting different parties (mainly women).
The truth of it is, is they are mainly affairs, conducted by 'enlighted' intellegent women who think they've seen the light on how to fall in love without getting hurt. They deny having basic feelings of insecurity and jealousy that lower mortals in primary relationships have, theirs is the truth.
Until of course, the fun ends, they are devalued or discarded or maybe even start an official relationship if they manage to usurp a primary partner,
This FWB term can be just another cloak for destroying marriages but it started oh so innocently. If they suceed in becoming primary partner they then will do a full switch and then want the full terms and respect of a primary partner, it is only then they will join the mainstream and protect their own union, so no different from other women really.
I wonder how many FWB outgrow these relationships realising they are just another way for men to engineer getting sex without conditions.
FWB's cause a lot of damage in society and communities, just as affairs do but placing this stupid quirky name acts as some sort of protection as to the real nature of this behaviour.
I know I sound soap boxy but the devaluing of sex leads to my mind to the direct devaluing of women.