Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Turn your son in knowing it’s the death penalty?

1000 replies

TaupeLemur · 12/09/2025 15:28

Kirk’s killer has apparently been turned in by his family - or persuaded to hand himself in.
Trump &’his supporters have been very vocal about getting the death penalty for the shooter.

would YOU hand your child over, knowing that the electric chair would be the likely outcome?

YANBU - I wouldn’t turn him in to die.

YABU - I would he’s a killer and deserves all he gets

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:37

I am not sorry for saying his daughters will be better off in the long run. Their father didn’t believe they should be allowed to vote, or have an education unless it was with the express purpose of finding a husband. He believed they should have to carry rape babies even as children themselves. He believed they should submit to their husbands in all things - so domestic violence, marital rape - they should just suck it up. They are better off.

Another2Cats · 12/09/2025 20:38

Shewasafaireh · 12/09/2025 19:58

For this? Absolutely not.

If it was something else - ie child abuse - then absolutely yes.

So you wouldn't for a very deliberate and calculated murder - as people have said, an assassination?

"If it was something else - ie child abuse - then absolutely yes."

I would be very interested to understand your reasoning here (very serious question indeed).

So, if your son were to abuse a child then you would report him, but if he murdered that child then you would not?

How about if he abused the child and then murdered her? Would you hand him in then?

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/09/2025 20:39

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:34

I mean, they are 1 and 3, so likely won’t have any firsthand memory of it at all.

They will grow up knowing their father would force them to give birth to a rapist’s baby. Is that somehow better?

They would have grown up knowing that he had said that if he hadn’t been shot. Do you think one day those children will look back and be glad their dad was shot and it was recorded for all to see and loads of people celebrated it afterwards? Just for saying words about a hypothetical situation that will probably never arise? No matter how abhorrent his view is on abortion, I would imagine that his kids will never be thankful that he was shot for them.

SeriaMau · 12/09/2025 20:39

Poetnojo · 12/09/2025 19:01

Yeah just lunatic lefties murdering you for your opinions

58 shootings by right wing terrorists. 1 (or 2) shootings by left wing terrorists, in recent years.

wiminny · 12/09/2025 20:39

It appears he wasn't a Left wing libtard after all. Much pivoting going on amongst a certain cohort now. The shock of it all really to think the deceased wasn't far right enough so had to be eliminated. Jostle for position imminent.

PurpleFlower1983 · 12/09/2025 20:40

Another2Cats · 12/09/2025 20:38

So you wouldn't for a very deliberate and calculated murder - as people have said, an assassination?

"If it was something else - ie child abuse - then absolutely yes."

I would be very interested to understand your reasoning here (very serious question indeed).

So, if your son were to abuse a child then you would report him, but if he murdered that child then you would not?

How about if he abused the child and then murdered her? Would you hand him in then?

What some people may argue is that what Kirk was inciting had the potential to create more harm and violence than what has been done against him.

I’m assuming that’s the usual reasoning behind such ‘assassinations’.

InMyShowgirlEra · 12/09/2025 20:40

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/09/2025 20:31

Words are not as dangerous as bullets.
He went on to say after that quote how he thought they should reduce gun related murders/violence. So he clearly wasn’t in favour of innocent people dying by being shot. His theory was, if more people had guns - if people were guarding schools with guns for example then that would reduce gun related deaths but they would never be able to get them to zero.

Absolutely irrational point of view in my opinion, i don’t agree with it at all. But he didn’t say that he was in favour of people being shot.
So no, I don’t think he would say it’s ok for him to be collateral damage either.

We really need to differentiate between words and actions.

I would argue that words are far more dangerous. CK has a huge influence over a lot of people. He used his platform to set back restrictions on gun ownership, women's rights, rights for people of colour and gay people, among others. He spread false claims including that the election was "stolen" and contributed to causing the riots after Biden's election. He has caused far more damage than someone who shot one person- especially when you factor in the rise in violent criminals coming out of MAGA and the things they've done.

He said that gun deaths were "unfortunate" but a fair price to pay. He literally said that gun victims were a fair trade off. He said that shooting victims and their families must not be allowed to "emotionally hijack the narrative". He also said that empathy was a bad thing, so if (for some strange reason) you have any respect for him, it would be against his wishes to express empathy for him or his family.

Unless of course you're admitting he was a massive hypocrite who was fine with OTHER people dying, and OTHER people not getting empathy, but not for himself.

GetOffMyLan · 12/09/2025 20:40

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 20:30

So... the conclusion from this thread so far. That terrorism is coming from the left (dangerously)

🤣🤣🤣

XelaM · 12/09/2025 20:40

Rosscameasdoody · 12/09/2025 20:33

I think that’s a truly dreadful thing to say. Why is it so difficult to believe that he would want his son taken off the streets so that he can’t hurt anyone else ? His son acted as judge, jury and executioner to someone whose viewpoints he doesn’t agree with, in the full knowledge that there’s the chance he would pay with his own life. His father is likely going through the worst pain of his life - both for what his son has done, and for having done what is undoubtedly the right thing, and handing him in for his own protection and that of other innocent people. If you have so little empathy that you can’t imagine that pain, and prefer to think he’s monetarised it, then I’m truly sorry for you.

Edited

I think anyone who handed their child in knowing they would face the death penalty or life in prison is not acting to protect their child and it's not something I can understand 🤷‍♀️ Also don't think his dad believed he was a risk to the general public. He clearly intended to kill one particular person

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:41

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 20:35

Do you ALSO want Muslims, Jews dead? Anyone who doesn't agree with you?

Please point to where I’ve said I wanted him dead. Do go ahead, I’ll wait. I do not advocate the murder no anyone, no matter how disgusting a person they are. Should he have been murdered? Absolutely not. Is it sad he’s dead? No it is not - he was a hateful person. Are his daughters more likely to be free of hate now he is gone? Yes they are.

HonestOpalHelper · 12/09/2025 20:41

TaupeLemur · 12/09/2025 15:28

Kirk’s killer has apparently been turned in by his family - or persuaded to hand himself in.
Trump &’his supporters have been very vocal about getting the death penalty for the shooter.

would YOU hand your child over, knowing that the electric chair would be the likely outcome?

YANBU - I wouldn’t turn him in to die.

YABU - I would he’s a killer and deserves all he gets

Kirk was killed in Utah, Utah has never used the electric chair or had one, traditionally they use firing squad but lethal injection is the default option now, but inmates can choose firing squad.

Rosscameasdoody · 12/09/2025 20:41

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:34

I mean, they are 1 and 3, so likely won’t have any firsthand memory of it at all.

They will grow up knowing their father would force them to give birth to a rapist’s baby. Is that somehow better?

So basically what you’re saying is that Kirk deserved what he got, and his family, who witnessed the horrific event, are collateral damage in that ? His children may not remember it, but his wife certainly will. You should be ashamed of yourself.

HuckleberryBlackcurrant · 12/09/2025 20:41

Yes, absolutely I would turn them in.

whimsicallyprickly · 12/09/2025 20:42

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 20:30

So... the conclusion from this thread so far. That terrorism is coming from the left (dangerously)

Which thread are you reading? 🤣🤣

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 20:43

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:37

I am not sorry for saying his daughters will be better off in the long run. Their father didn’t believe they should be allowed to vote, or have an education unless it was with the express purpose of finding a husband. He believed they should have to carry rape babies even as children themselves. He believed they should submit to their husbands in all things - so domestic violence, marital rape - they should just suck it up. They are better off.

I think you are slightly delusional. Speaking ill of the dead (someone that got murdered) JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE OPPOSING BLOODY POLITICAL VIEWS FFS is pretty shocking in itself. Celebrating their death, an utter disgrace!

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:43

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/09/2025 20:39

They would have grown up knowing that he had said that if he hadn’t been shot. Do you think one day those children will look back and be glad their dad was shot and it was recorded for all to see and loads of people celebrated it afterwards? Just for saying words about a hypothetical situation that will probably never arise? No matter how abhorrent his view is on abortion, I would imagine that his kids will never be thankful that he was shot for them.

I don’t imagine they will be thankful he was shot, no. But I do imagine they will now have a chance at a more tolerant and loving upbringing.

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/09/2025 20:44

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:37

I am not sorry for saying his daughters will be better off in the long run. Their father didn’t believe they should be allowed to vote, or have an education unless it was with the express purpose of finding a husband. He believed they should have to carry rape babies even as children themselves. He believed they should submit to their husbands in all things - so domestic violence, marital rape - they should just suck it up. They are better off.

I don’t recall anywhere hearing that Kirk thought women shouldn’t vote or be educated or any of the rest of it.

But even if it is true consider this… do you hold the same political views now that you did ten years ago? I know I don’t. I’ve evolved and changed as I have matured (and hope to keep doing so until the day I die) some things I would have said ten years ago would make me shudder now. Kirk’s views were not set in stone, nobody’s are. The problem is, any chance he may have had to evolve and grow and change has been taken away from him. And you are actually happy about it.

InMyShowgirlEra · 12/09/2025 20:45

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 20:43

I think you are slightly delusional. Speaking ill of the dead (someone that got murdered) JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE OPPOSING BLOODY POLITICAL VIEWS FFS is pretty shocking in itself. Celebrating their death, an utter disgrace!

Thinking that women are human beings equal to men is not a political opinion, it's just very, very basic morality. There aren't a lot of things which can be very easily be separated into good and bad and right and wrong but that's one of them, and if you treat women like chattels then you're a bad person.

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:45

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 20:43

I think you are slightly delusional. Speaking ill of the dead (someone that got murdered) JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE OPPOSING BLOODY POLITICAL VIEWS FFS is pretty shocking in itself. Celebrating their death, an utter disgrace!

Did I miss the part where people magically stop being a terrible person just because they’ve died?

Charlie Kirk was an absolutely heinous excuse of a human being. Did he deserve to be murdered for it? No of course not, and nowhere have I said he did. But it is also not sad that a person who spent their life promoting hate and bigotry is dead.

GoldThumb · 12/09/2025 20:45

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 17:21

Im utterly shocked at some of these posts, so people actually think if they dont agree with their political views they DESERVE to get assassinated? WTF I knew this world was turning bad but seriously that's evil.

There Was a thread immediately after it happened, majority of the comments were like this.

Scary how they walk among us.

Rosscameasdoody · 12/09/2025 20:45

HonestOpalHelper · 12/09/2025 20:41

Kirk was killed in Utah, Utah has never used the electric chair or had one, traditionally they use firing squad but lethal injection is the default option now, but inmates can choose firing squad.

They haven’t executed anyone since 1977. Aggravated murder is the only charge that attracts the death penalty, but prosecutors have to specifically request it, and they usually don't, preferring to opt for life without parole or a minimum sentence of 25 years.

SparklingRivers · 12/09/2025 20:46

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:05

I think it’s awful that he was murdered, but those little girls may now have the chance to be raised by someone who might show compassion, love and tolerance, rather than someone who publicly insists that if they are raped as 10 year olds he’s forcing them to give birth to that rape baby.

Plenty of people have extremist religious or moral opinions on certain topics. I absolutely don't agree with his view there, but it doesn't mean he deserves to die or that his children are better off with him dead.

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 20:46

whimsicallyprickly · 12/09/2025 20:42

Which thread are you reading? 🤣🤣

This one. Its rife with hatred.

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 12/09/2025 20:46

DriveVerySlowlyPastNumber23IWantThemToSeeMyHat · 12/09/2025 15:32

If all evidence is a definite that's him and he admits it, why shouldn't it be a death penalty?

Kirk's 2 children are now growing up without a Daddy.

will the death penalty bring their father back? Or will it simply end up leaving other people fatherless/without their child etc.?

InMyShowgirlEra · 12/09/2025 20:46

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/09/2025 20:44

I don’t recall anywhere hearing that Kirk thought women shouldn’t vote or be educated or any of the rest of it.

But even if it is true consider this… do you hold the same political views now that you did ten years ago? I know I don’t. I’ve evolved and changed as I have matured (and hope to keep doing so until the day I die) some things I would have said ten years ago would make me shudder now. Kirk’s views were not set in stone, nobody’s are. The problem is, any chance he may have had to evolve and grow and change has been taken away from him. And you are actually happy about it.

Yeh, my political views have slightly changed over the years, like I've changed my opinion slightly on education and the economy. I've not changed my mind on whether human beings are equal to one another.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.