Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Turn your son in knowing it’s the death penalty?

1000 replies

TaupeLemur · 12/09/2025 15:28

Kirk’s killer has apparently been turned in by his family - or persuaded to hand himself in.
Trump &’his supporters have been very vocal about getting the death penalty for the shooter.

would YOU hand your child over, knowing that the electric chair would be the likely outcome?

YANBU - I wouldn’t turn him in to die.

YABU - I would he’s a killer and deserves all he gets

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
WhereIsMyJumper · 12/09/2025 20:23

whimsicallyprickly · 12/09/2025 20:12

Kirk said its OK for some people to be murdered every year by being shot. He said its a price worth paying to ensure that the 2nd amendment is safe and sound (paraphrasing)

I'm guessing "be careful what you wish for" fits well here

No, I wouldn't hand my son in because he assassinated Kirk

Kirk said some words. Firstly, they are words that you are paraphrasing and they are words that are taken out of an entire response he gave to someone who asked him a question about protecting the second amendment.
Secondly, nobody deserves to be shot for saying words. Even if you REALLY disagree with them (I don’t agree with guns myself)
Lastly, murdering someone is much worse than saying some words.

CicerosHead · 12/09/2025 20:24

I agree with death penalty.

As for my theoretical son.. Depends who he killed. If it's something like that evil animal who stabbed the Ukrainian girl on the train the other day - I'd turn him in in a heartbeat. Same for serial killers, family annihilators and suchlike. He would deserve everything they'd throw at him, including the death penalty.

If he'd kill someone like Putin, Trump, Vance - no chance. I'd give him money and help him to run. Kirk? The dude said: 'I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.' So it is rational and his death was worth it, to protect the god-given rights to own guns, according to him. So no, obviously I wouldn't turn my child in for killing Kirk. Live by the sword and all that.

Mirabella7 · 12/09/2025 20:24

Such a terrible dilemma but I would because there’s no escaping arrest and facing the consequences. Regardless of what anyone thinks about the death penalty if that’s the law it’s out of your hands.

PurpleFlower1983 · 12/09/2025 20:24

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/09/2025 20:23

Kirk said some words. Firstly, they are words that you are paraphrasing and they are words that are taken out of an entire response he gave to someone who asked him a question about protecting the second amendment.
Secondly, nobody deserves to be shot for saying words. Even if you REALLY disagree with them (I don’t agree with guns myself)
Lastly, murdering someone is much worse than saying some words.

It’s ok as long as it’s not him. Turns out guns kill white guys too 🤷🏼‍♀️

Words can be dangerous, I doubt his family will find much comfort in his.

Another2Cats · 12/09/2025 20:25

Tigger1895 · 12/09/2025 19:45

Live on tv knowing that lot

And when has that ever, ever, happened in Utah?

Serious question, btw.

Also, who exactly are "that lot"?

Liondoesntsleepatnight · 12/09/2025 20:25

Handed in peacefully or a shootout. His family did the right thing

Rosscameasdoody · 12/09/2025 20:26

PurpleFlower1983 · 12/09/2025 20:09

I’m against the death penalty in all circumstances so no, I would not be turning him in.

So because you’re against the death penalty you would shield someone who clearly isn’t, because they’ve appointed themselves judge, jury and executioner. Do you not think that’s a tad hypocritical ?

wiminny · 12/09/2025 20:26

Life appears to be quite cheap in America. Unless you are a foetus that is. Then when the foetus is forcibly born in situations where abortion is banned, the living baby could be murdered, (or live a life of poverty and neglect) and the perpetrator executed. No bother at all squaring all that up is there?

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 20:26

EasternStandard · 12/09/2025 20:15

Awful thing to say.

I know. The disgusting things from this thread is unreal!

Thelnebriati · 12/09/2025 20:26

The number of replies on the first page saying they would cover up a murder because they disagree with the death penalty is one reason why I am against the death penalty for paedophiles and rapists.

whimsicallyprickly · 12/09/2025 20:26

Kirk? The dude said: 'I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.' So it is rational and his death was worth it, to protect the god-given rights to own guns, according to him. So no, obviously I wouldn't turn my child in for killing Kirk. Live by the sword and all that

Yes. Kirk was sanguine about some gun deaths. His death was a gun death

It's all good, by Kirks rationale

Oscarsmom71 · 12/09/2025 20:27

I’d Never turn my child in for death penalty.
Prisin yes as have to pay for crimes but I dint agree with the death penalty anyway.

XelaM · 12/09/2025 20:28

Rosscameasdoody · 12/09/2025 20:22

Would you hand your own child in specifically for the reward, or would you think it the right thing to do ?

I wouldn't hand them in at all, which is why it's inexplicable to me. I can only guess he wanted the reward

Firefly1987 · 12/09/2025 20:28

I mean presumably he put his dad in that position in the first place by confessing to him? I'm not a parent so can't really answer but all I'd be thinking is that things would be even worse for everyone if I didn't tell the police what I knew. It's not like the authorities weren't ever going to find out at some point.

Rosscameasdoody · 12/09/2025 20:29

wiminny · 12/09/2025 20:26

Life appears to be quite cheap in America. Unless you are a foetus that is. Then when the foetus is forcibly born in situations where abortion is banned, the living baby could be murdered, (or live a life of poverty and neglect) and the perpetrator executed. No bother at all squaring all that up is there?

Engaging with the pro lifers I know, making sure that the pregnancy goes to term and the baby is born is their priority. They couldnt give a flying fuck what happens to the child, or the mother after that.

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 20:30

So... the conclusion from this thread so far. That terrorism is coming from the left (dangerously)

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/09/2025 20:31

PurpleFlower1983 · 12/09/2025 20:24

It’s ok as long as it’s not him. Turns out guns kill white guys too 🤷🏼‍♀️

Words can be dangerous, I doubt his family will find much comfort in his.

Edited

Words are not as dangerous as bullets.
He went on to say after that quote how he thought they should reduce gun related murders/violence. So he clearly wasn’t in favour of innocent people dying by being shot. His theory was, if more people had guns - if people were guarding schools with guns for example then that would reduce gun related deaths but they would never be able to get them to zero.

Absolutely irrational point of view in my opinion, i don’t agree with it at all. But he didn’t say that he was in favour of people being shot.
So no, I don’t think he would say it’s ok for him to be collateral damage either.

We really need to differentiate between words and actions.

SeriaMau · 12/09/2025 20:32

DriveVerySlowlyPastNumber23IWantThemToSeeMyHat · 12/09/2025 15:32

If all evidence is a definite that's him and he admits it, why shouldn't it be a death penalty?

Kirk's 2 children are now growing up without a Daddy.

That wasn’t the question.

Another2Cats · 12/09/2025 20:32

JHound · 12/09/2025 20:02

We don’t have a motive yet.

Oh please, do stop trying to defend this piece of ....

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:32

EasternStandard · 12/09/2025 20:15

Awful thing to say.

It’s a lot better than proudly announcing you’d force your raped child to give birth to their rapist’s baby.

In fact, I’m actively wishing a more promising future for them than their own father did.

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:32

Rosscameasdoody · 12/09/2025 20:09

What an awful thing to say. He was their father FFS !! He was murdered for his beliefs - whether we align ourselves with those beliefs or not, the second we start to condone that, free speech is dead and gone.

It’s a lot better than proudly announcing you’d force your raped child to give birth to their rapist’s baby.

In fact, I’m actively wishing a more promising future for them than their own father did.

Rosscameasdoody · 12/09/2025 20:33

XelaM · 12/09/2025 20:28

I wouldn't hand them in at all, which is why it's inexplicable to me. I can only guess he wanted the reward

I think that’s a truly dreadful thing to say. Why is it so difficult to believe that he would want his son taken off the streets so that he can’t hurt anyone else ? His son acted as judge, jury and executioner to someone whose viewpoints he doesn’t agree with, in the full knowledge that there’s the chance he would pay with his own life. His father is likely going through the worst pain of his life - both for what his son has done, and for having done what is undoubtedly the right thing, and handing him in for his own protection and that of other innocent people. If you have so little empathy that you can’t imagine that pain, and prefer to think he’s monetarised it, then I’m truly sorry for you.

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:34

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/09/2025 20:10

Do you think it’s preferable for them to have witnessed their father’s murder and be left with the trauma of it all? Not to mention possibly one day knowing so many people were happy about his death… just so they can hopefully one day get a new dad?

I mean, they are 1 and 3, so likely won’t have any firsthand memory of it at all.

They will grow up knowing their father would force them to give birth to a rapist’s baby. Is that somehow better?

MyLimeGuide · 12/09/2025 20:35

DorothyGaleFromKansas · 12/09/2025 20:32

It’s a lot better than proudly announcing you’d force your raped child to give birth to their rapist’s baby.

In fact, I’m actively wishing a more promising future for them than their own father did.

Do you ALSO want Muslims, Jews dead? Anyone who doesn't agree with you?

DuesToTheDirt · 12/09/2025 20:37

I don't think I could turn him in for the death penalty, though I'd do it for life imprisonment. If I thought he was a risk to more people in the future though, maybe I'd turn him in despite the death penalty. I don't know.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.