That is fundamentally wrong in terms of reasonable adjustments. Yes everyone might like them or enjoy them but not everyone needs them to function well and properly. I need flexible working times because I may have more pain in the morning and I can't shower as soon I need to, or after I come out of the shower I need to rest and do nothing for 30 minutes because it's aggravated my symptoms, so I get into work later. Maybe I spend the early morning vomiting and then need to come into work later, after I rest for a bit - good employers and university/schools I've been in have always understood and allowed flexible timings for this. Again even on a good day of baseline symptoms, I would start school later during 6th form (only missed study/free periods in the morning), because having more rest is more necessary for me as a person with chronic illness and one of the symptoms I have is fatigue (which is not the same as being tired), the extra 1h and 30 minutes sleeping meant I rested more, stayed in school and lessons longer, concentrated better and did better work.
And this principle applies to many other disabilities, including mental illness and learning disabilities. For example, someone with severe anxiety, autism, or ADHD may find being asked interview questions without time to prepare extremely overwhelming. They may freeze, struggle to process ( they often have slower processing speeds for conversations, again same with Auditory Processing Disorder), or be unable to articulate what they actually know. Being sent questions in advance doesn’t give them an “unfair advantage”; it simply allows them to demonstrate their actual skills and knowledge on a level playing field with non-disabled applicants, who are not disadvantaged by being able to answer spontaneously. Similarly, for someone with dyslexia or processing difficulties, knowing the questions beforehand reduces cognitive overload and means they aren't held back by barriers unrelated to the role itself.
Reasonable adjustments are not about giving disabled people more than others; they are about removing barriers so that disabled people can perform equally. Without them, disabled people are automatically disadvantaged by circumstances completely outside their control.
Non-disabled people don’t face those barriers in the first place, so they aren’t losing anything when adjustments are made, instead they're simply experiencing the default world already designed for them. Reasonable adjustments create equity, which is recognising that different people need different support to reach the same outcome. That’s what the law requires, and that’s what fairness looks like.