To think any man who participates in Bonnie Blue’s stunts should be publicly identifiable?

[ThisVividFinch]

I’m talking about things like the “1000 men in 12 hours” she declared - if a man chooses to take part in something like that, I think he should have to show his face and name. Transparency, right?

You want to line up for it? Fine. But own it. Be publicly accountable for the behaviour you’re willing to engage in.

I wouldn’t want anyone in my life or circle - friend, partner, colleague, who saw that and thought “yeah, I’m in.” So crack on if that’s your vibe but women should at least have access to the list.

AIBU?

I wonder how many of their partners know.

I agree with your sentiment and I genuinely think these men are abusing a mentally ill woman but they don't have to identify themselves.

Perhaps Miss Blue could do us all a favour and make it one of her conditions?

Why are the men anonymous but the woman isn’t? Can anyone explain that?

It’s all just so unbelievably grim.

If they choose to abuse a prostitute on video, we definitely need to see their faces, at the very least their wives and girlfriends need to have the chance to find out. They don't think there's anything wrong with abusing prostitutes, so they will have no problem being identified. Right?

It’s hard to believe there is 1000 men who willingly participate.
But I don’t think they should be publicly acknowledged. People get up to a lot of weird things which aren’t public information. Just because someone disagrees with someone’s morals, doesn’t make it illegal/wrong

I agree that there’s a layer of exploitation here too but that’s even more reason why these men shouldn’t get to stay anonymous. If they’re comfortable enough to participate, they should be comfortable enough to be visible.

YABU for starting a thread and driving traffic to her content.

Exactly - that’s part of what I’m questioning. She’s out there with her name and face attached to everything, for better or worse. But the men lining up to participate? Totally hidden. If you’re proud enough to be part of it, why not stand in the same light?

I personally don’t care much about it however I wish everyone that has a wife or girlfriend ar home knew x

Really nobody should do anything they wouldn't want their spouses/partners to know about. Sex related or otherwise!

Because shes proudly advertising the event to gain publicity. Its not a case of her being identified because shes female

Why are the men anonymous but the woman isn’t? Can anyone explain that?
I imagine because it's Bonnie Blue's project and she is publicising it for her own gain is why she isn't anonymous.
Apparently its 'empowering ' or other such bollocks.
Its still grim however you dress it up.

Well she’s presumably not anonymous as she wants to advertise her ‘event’ and draw the crowds of willing men in. Awful, but it’s her choice.

Why are you focused on one of the few sex workers who is making significant money. Surely the woman in your neighbourhood having to do sex work is a real crime

Is Bonnie Blue paying for all this publicity on Mnet?

They probably look like every other man.

I understand that it is her body, her choice, as I'm allowed my opinion on her public performance, I think she is disgusting to have one sweaty penis after the other pounding her vulva for financial gain.

That queue was revolting! I saw it and thought about how they were all someone’s husband, father, brother, boyfriend etc. It’s VILE. What kind of man wants to do that?? Yes I think naming and shaming them (on billboards!!!) would be appropriate 🤮🤮🤮

I was listening to a podcast she recently did and the guys were timed and it was intimate contact for 30 to 40 seconds then they had to leave . It’s mad how many men would sign up for this . They apparently got ski masks to hide their identity , but seriously how would this be appealing. Unless ur a sex starved teenager but that’s probably the catch

Because the woman in this scenario is happy to have a public profile? Really not that difficult to understand...

Why are you focused on one of the few sex workers who is making significant money?

Think you've answered your own question there...

Is there another one or are you bringing up the old one?

This is bizarre reasoning. Who gets to decide what sexual acts fit the bill for compulsory public identification?! There's lots of things that adults are comfortable to participate in that they aren't comfortable being made public. Consenting to sex with someone (as they did) is not the same as consenting for that act to be broadcast or made known around the world.
I'm not a fan of this kind of thing, but I'm also not a fan of dreadful reasoning

Yes. The should all be tattooed on their foreheads with the number they were given in the queue and a picture of a crab.

Because she’s doing it to make
money and the men aren’t.