To think any man who participates in Bonnie Blue’s stunts should be publicly identifiable?

[ThisVividFinch]

I’m talking about things like the “1000 men in 12 hours” she declared - if a man chooses to take part in something like that, I think he should have to show his face and name. Transparency, right?

You want to line up for it? Fine. But own it. Be publicly accountable for the behaviour you’re willing to engage in.

I wouldn’t want anyone in my life or circle - friend, partner, colleague, who saw that and thought “yeah, I’m in.” So crack on if that’s your vibe but women should at least have access to the list.

AIBU?

But people claim a right to privacy for all kinds of things outside of any question of them being "wrong".

The logical consequence of what you, and the insanity of this thread, are saying, is that nobody has a right to privacy for anything. If they're doing something wrong then there's a public interest in exposing it; if they're NOT doing anything wrong then they have nothing to be ashamed of so shouldn't need privacy!

Privacy doesn't work like that.

How did that even work? So presumably noone or almost noone ejaculated, it was just 40 seconds of in-out and that's it?

What a pointless waste of time.

And subjectively wrong at that. It is scary how quickly people would want to remove basic human rights to control you.

Women deserve to know who has participated so they can be pushing them away with the longest barge pole imaginable. Disgusting individuals with no moral compass and no doubt walking petrie dishes who have no respect for women.

It certainly would be interesting to know a bit more about the sort of men who would do this. I would presume mostly young, ones who would boast about it, a certain personality and value of women type?

Indeed.

Correct. And that is why the men hide their degenerate faces. They are fully aware that what they are doing is bottom of the barrel lowest scum in the gutter activity. They'd be ostracised by normal people if their faces were shown.

Nope, the logical conclusion of this is that men who abuse prostitutes are unmasked and then they will be shunned and find themselves for the most part single.

But of course that won't happen, men will continue to protect men's "rights" to be disgusting degenerate filth with great vigour, and cockpanderers will cheer them on.

The men were not paying to participate in this correct? So it was really just a woman having sex with a lot of people? Otherwise it would have been shut down for being illegal?

I think she acting like a total and utter slut and thinks it’s funny that she is earning all that money.
Good luck when she’s older and lost her looks and riddled with disease
and shame on her disgusting parents that participate in such repugnant behaviour.
what is wrong with them?!?!?

This!! I'm sure there are many more people who should be exposed OP. How will you identify all these people and where would you like to start?

Because she doesn't want to be. She is advertising herself.

The problem is that Tia is normalising porn behaviour.
She has openly stated that she doesn't orgasm, she is there only to please men, which is a shocking admission of mental damage.
All men should be publicly identifiable, but I think that most of the men raping her are okay with it.

I'm not too sure that getting publicity on Mumsnet would be too high on her agenda. After all, I do still think that the majority of Mumsnetters are still female, even if more and more of them are not actually mothers. Maybe I am mistaken in my belief that there will be very few - if any - members here, who will turn to our sexual partners and say "oh that woman who apparently had sex with 1000 men in 12 hours, is looking for more men to have sex with, do you fancy giving it a go darling?"

Although I would be interested in being proved wrong about that!

Any man using a sex worker is a rapist.
You cannot buy consent.
Porn, and the acceptance of porn, is one of the most damaging things in our society.

Well, I have no idea about whether you are bring serious or not @SaintGermain and I think that would be a really awful thing to do, especially if the participants were teenagers, or under the age of 26 years old.

However, 40 or so years ago, when AIDS was rife and incurable, I used to think that if someone diagnosed with it had unprotected & undeclared sex with someone else, then they should actually have it tattooed on their forehead, well maybe a small emoji type thing that people knew what it stood for, eg a little gun maybe, but only once they had knowingly tried to pass it on.

They’re not just pounding her vulva. It’s penetrative sex. Use the correct terminology!

She's going to run out of stunts soon surely. It's not like she can sleep with any more men than that in one go, it's not physically possible.

Don't be ridiculous. Women have agency too.

Yes I don't think I implied that using prostitutes should be legal. I'd like to criminalise prostitute abusers, and we should have public access to any sex offenders names and photographs.

Hahahahaha! Nah. Tattoo every last fucking man who abuses prostitutes. Marvellous idea in fact.

That the men are anonymous is the entire point of the enterprise - any man, any dick is welcome. She isn't choosy. She doesn't care who sticks it in.

I'm surprised so many of you don't get that.

The thousand men was a lie. Its been widely debunked. She did some kind of a gangbang, but nowhere near over a thousand. The logistics of it alone are impossible and she has never provided any proof other than a few photos and videos of a few 10s of men queuing up.

Still think its grimy as anything, but let's look at it sensibly.

Her whole persona is clever marketing on her part. The only confirmation anyone has for any of her claims is her word. Nearly all her actual 'material' is just her having sex with other paid performers.

She basically does what a hundred other porn stars do, but because she has generated this controversy around herself everyone knows who she is and she has made 100s of time more money than other women in her industry. In a way you have to take your hat off to her.

She’s a very sad young woman, as for the men, why would they even want to do that, it’s hardly for the sexual satisfaction, 40 seconds, even as a sex starved teen it took longer than that , sad sad people and I say that as a man