Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to agree with Diane Abbott

808 replies

Elephantiner · 17/07/2025 14:18

I cannot stand Diane Abbott, she has a lazy, patronising manner which riles me, but she has said that people visiblybof a different race (e.g. black people) experience a different sort of racism than those who’s race is not visually obvious (travellers, Jewish people etc). She has a point, doesn’t she? Am I missing something here?

Obviously all types of racism are utterly abhorrent.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
PhilippaGeorgiou · 17/07/2025 20:04

I'm Irish. I have an English accent. I hear and experience racism all the time. But she's correct. How I experience it makes me very angry, but it is experienced differently than bigotry based on skin colour. It isn't a race to the bottom, or to the "top". Racism is racism. We experience it differently, but it is disgusting we experience it at all. Isn't that the point? It is 2025 and we still propagate hate and bigotry based on difference rather than focus on our similarities- we are all humans.

Seagullsandsausagerolls · 17/07/2025 20:07

myplace · 17/07/2025 16:18

So, I think she’s describing a very different experience.

I don’t think there is an acceptable face of racism against black people any more. There is ignorance, yes, and some diehard bigots lurking in backward corners. There’s inequality of outcome but not necessarily related to being black, so much as to poverty. Poor white boys have shocking outcomes as well.

Travellers, Jews and Muslims face severe criticism that’s not easy to distinguish from racism. There are conversations all the time about the appalling behaviour of some people in these groups, that must feel very challenging if you are also Jewish, or a Muslim, or a Traveller.

I take part in those conversations and it’s really hard to tread a line around the criticism that needs to be discussed, and that which is racism.

I wouldn’t like to be a Traveller- and equally I hate the behaviour of a significant chunk of travellers.

Those conversations aren't happening about black people. So you could argue it’s the other way round.

Your third paragraph is verging into victim blaming.

HippogryphicalHistogram · 17/07/2025 20:09

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 19:52

That would be fair enough to say if that was what she said. But she didn't say that. Everyone should read what she actually said.

I do think actually there is a hierarchy of racism and I think black and maybe Asian Muslim men probably face the most discrimination.

I am not keen on the distinction between racism and prejudice. If someone white British converts to Judaism and then faces hostility or discrimination for it it's fine to call it racism. It's an irrelevant semantic point.

And I actually think what on earth was she thinking when she said that in pre civil rights Jews didn't have to sit at the back of the bus unlike blacks. Of course they didn't but then has she forgotten what Jews faced in nazi Germany?

Absentmindedsmile · 17/07/2025 20:10

IncyWincyEyeroll · 17/07/2025 14:41

But it’s at best idiotic, at worse malign. Yes, you can instantly see skin colour in a way you can’t always see other things - but (a), in her constituency alone there are lots of orthodox Jewish people who, through their dress, are equally as instantly recognisable by their Judaism as anyone would be by their skin colour, (b) it suggests that people have the privilege of hiding their Judaism in a way black people can’t, which is crass (to say the least) given the history of Jewish persecution and the complete inability to hide from that persecution (not to mention that nobody should have to hide their ethnicity or see doing so as a privilege), (c) she compared Jewish people and Irish travellers to people with red hair, which is trivialising and comparing groups who have suffered genocide (Jews) and hugely low social and economic discrimination and disadvantage (travellers) with people who suffer social bullying, and (d) she did this in the context of the Labour Party being blind to antisemitism in its own ranks, including by the leadership at the time of which she was a senior part. And lastly, she said today that she didn’t understand why anyone would object to what she said, which given the discussion about it at the time must mean she hasn’t listened to anything anyone said. She doesn’t have to agree with the point of view, but to not even be able to state what it is must mean she’s either unwilling or unable to listen.

So no, I don’t think she’s right, and my sympathy is about level with the floor.

Agreed.

anotherside · 17/07/2025 20:11

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 18:47

She was responding to this article which said that gypsy/travellers and Jewish people were amongst the most likely to say they had suffered racist abuse.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/15/racism-in-britain-is-not-a-black-and-white-issue-it-is-far-more-complicated

Diane doesn't think they can experience racism. Racism is only for people with dark skin according to Diane.

I still can't get past her comment about the buses. It's true that Jews were not being sent to the back of the bus in 1950s America, but they were being murdered in their millions here in Europe in the 1940s.

She's either a Holocaust denier or incredibly thick. Maybe both.

Edited

Her parents were a welder and a nurse. She got into Cambridge as a black working class girl in the early 70s. She became the first black woman MP in the history of the UK. She’s beaten odds and achieved stuff that the vast majority of her detractors can’t even imagine.

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 20:12

PhilippaGeorgiou · 17/07/2025 20:04

I'm Irish. I have an English accent. I hear and experience racism all the time. But she's correct. How I experience it makes me very angry, but it is experienced differently than bigotry based on skin colour. It isn't a race to the bottom, or to the "top". Racism is racism. We experience it differently, but it is disgusting we experience it at all. Isn't that the point? It is 2025 and we still propagate hate and bigotry based on difference rather than focus on our similarities- we are all humans.

No that's not the point. She said that what you experience isn't racism at all, and when 6m Jews were murdered in the 1940s that was merely prejudice rather than racism too, and she implies is wasn't as significant as black people being told to sit at the back of the bus in the US in the 1950s.

AIBU to agree with Diane Abbott
WitchesofPainswick · 17/07/2025 20:13

She worded it poorly, but she is correct.

SunnieShine · 17/07/2025 20:14

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

MissyB1 · 17/07/2025 20:16

I think she raises an interesting point, are racism /prejudice /bigotry exactly the same, or are they different things? Its good to have these kinds of conversations, we don't all need to froth in rage, or fall over in horror! She certainly should never have been suspended from the Labour Party (twice now!) I think Starmer hates her because shes always been close to Corbyn. And the media hate her because she's a strong straight talking black woman.

FighterPilotSwifts · 17/07/2025 20:18

EasternStandard · 17/07/2025 19:59

Why comment on Jewish people in particular? As Abbott did

She commented about travellers too, has anyone pulled her up on that?

OvernightBloats · 17/07/2025 20:19

Diane Abbot's opinion minimises other peoples' experience of prejudice and racism. This very dangerous, divisive and not helpful in the long run. Her arrogance and obstinance means she has doubled down on her theory and has not managed to accept that she has offended many.
The Labour Party was correct in suspending her. Diane Abbot, in a strange way, is encouraging divisiveness and negativity.

SpottyAardvark · 17/07/2025 20:21

Abbot is very likely going to retire at the next election anyway, so she doesn’t care whether she has the Labour whip or not. She can now say what she really thinks without having to worry about deselection. I disagree with her about many things, including many of her views on race, but she has earned the right to do that.

Smellisande · 17/07/2025 20:21

I agree with her.

DyslexicPoster · 17/07/2025 20:22

I'm white so don't think I have a right to say. But it's surface level instant racism.

If you put a traveler in a horse and trap I'd argue the hatred and ability to voice that without fear of anyone pulling you up isn't the same as it for black people. You'd be ripped apart for insulting a black person on FB.

You wouldn't for a traveler. However I doubt Diana has ever met a traveler so she can't relate.

She probably has no idea about Islamaphobia or being Irish during the IRA in England. She no doubt at all understands racism. But she can not talk for or relate to eg travelers.

NoSoupForU · 17/07/2025 20:23

I think it's very helpful to have discussions about different types of racism actually, and she's absolutely correct in what she's saying.

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 20:24

NoSoupForU · 17/07/2025 20:23

I think it's very helpful to have discussions about different types of racism actually, and she's absolutely correct in what she's saying.

She doesn't think there are different types of racism. She thinks that Jewish people and travellers do not ever experience racism.

SharonEllis · 17/07/2025 20:25

The racism of low expectations is disturbing to see. She is highly intelligent, experienced and savvy. She has experienced racism. She has been feted because of her race. To think she can't be expected to see racism and bigotry against other groups, particularly those with such a long experience of racism like Jews and travellers is unforgivable.

NoSoupForU · 17/07/2025 20:26

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 20:24

She doesn't think there are different types of racism. She thinks that Jewish people and travellers do not ever experience racism.

She absolutely didn't say that though. She said it is different. And it is.

Beanee · 17/07/2025 20:26

I agree with her. I have seen black people receive worse treatment than white people before they have even opened their mouths.

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 20:26

NoSoupForU · 17/07/2025 20:26

She absolutely didn't say that though. She said it is different. And it is.

She did.

AIBU to agree with Diane Abbott
Beanee · 17/07/2025 20:30

ceaseanddesisttobailiffs · 17/07/2025 17:09

A fair/white skinned person of any religious persuasion or ethnicity is unlikely to receive racism based on visual perception alone compared with someone of the same religion/ethnicity who has dark skin or wears religious dress or symbols.

For example, my Muslim friend in a hijab gets more abuse than my Muslim friend who has mousey brown hair, white skin with freckles and wears jeans and t-shirt - this is so apparent when I am with them esp around the time of 9/11. One could go out freely and the other couldn’t.
My friend of Indian heritage (but not Muslim) got abuse but my Muslim friend of fair skin received none.

It shows the idiocy of the human race.

The abuse visibly Muslim people got after 9/11 and 7/7 was awful. Nobody cared though.

Smellisande · 17/07/2025 20:32

Beanee · 17/07/2025 20:30

The abuse visibly Muslim people got after 9/11 and 7/7 was awful. Nobody cared though.

Sikhs were murdered after 9/11. Because they were mistaken for Muslims.

Beanee · 17/07/2025 20:36

Smellisande · 17/07/2025 20:32

Sikhs were murdered after 9/11. Because they were mistaken for Muslims.

Yep. Awful. Nobody innocent should have been targeted like this after those attacks. There was very little coverage in the media and people just suffered in silence with attacks or ‘joke’ or jibes from people for years afterwards.

EasternStandard · 17/07/2025 20:41

OvernightBloats · 17/07/2025 20:19

Diane Abbot's opinion minimises other peoples' experience of prejudice and racism. This very dangerous, divisive and not helpful in the long run. Her arrogance and obstinance means she has doubled down on her theory and has not managed to accept that she has offended many.
The Labour Party was correct in suspending her. Diane Abbot, in a strange way, is encouraging divisiveness and negativity.

Yes it’s sad to see. Politically she’s made headway but minimising other people’s experience of racism / antisemitism is not the way to go.

Dangermoo · 17/07/2025 20:43

anotherside · 17/07/2025 20:11

Her parents were a welder and a nurse. She got into Cambridge as a black working class girl in the early 70s. She became the first black woman MP in the history of the UK. She’s beaten odds and achieved stuff that the vast majority of her detractors can’t even imagine.

Edited

And?

Swipe left for the next trending thread