Also what is the obsession with people passing through safe countries? If I was fleeing I would attempt to reach somewhere that I would feel is best for me, not merely somewhere nearby.
I think this just underlines the implication that people are not fleeing in fear of their lives, but rather are purely economic migrants. Or that they began as asylum seekers/refugees, but then essentially morphed into economic migrants, when they figured that they were on the move anyway, so they decided to aim for their most favourite option of all.
I don't blame people at all for wanting to relocate somewhere more western/wealthier/with better healthcare or social security network - it would be a bit convenient for me if I did, when I just happened to be lucky enough to be born in a (very far from perfect but wealthy) western country.
But I think people need to be honest and own their choices. Yes, I'm sure you were a refugee when you fled from Somalia to France; but once you decided to leave France to get to the UK, you became an economic migrant (not that France is a poorer country than us) and you were no longer a refugee or asylum seeker.
By way of analogy, you may well be genuinely very hungry and summarily unable to feed your family, so no reasonable person would begrudge you the ability to use a food bank; BUT if you got to the food bank and then started insisting that you must have top branded food instead of Aldi own-brand, and that they really should be giving you fillet steak instead of meatballs... that's when people would stop having any sympathy for you and begin to see you as nothing more than an opportunist with no need whatsoever of sympathy or charity.