Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Was I unreasonable to post this picture (privacy)

250 replies

midlifesharp · 02/07/2025 17:49

DD competes in a sport. She’s ok but has never won anything. She enjoys it though. She’s trained a lot recently and had a competition I was able to attend - and she won!!! I managed to snap a once in a lifetime action shot of her doing so as well.

I have a very small private Facebook - fewer than 100 people. Family, friends and a few school parents. I wanted to post the picture, mainly for the older relatives. Now, also visible in shot was DDs friend, coming in behind her. Friend is lovely, mum is a little difficult. She’s super crunchy and quick to share her views. I checked with her before posting the picture as her child was also in it, not expecting any problems as she regularly posts her own pictures of her children. However she said that she didn’t want her daughter on anyone else’s social media -so I posted the picture with her daughter cropped out as much as possible and with the remaining half of her face blurred.
She’s now messaged me asking me to remove the whole picture as people who know the girls compete in the same team could guess that it’s her daughter. You cannot tell it’s her daughter at all! It’s half a blurred face, an arm and a leg.

Am I right to be a bit cross or have I misjudged a parenting/ privacy issue?

OP posts:
Dramatic · 05/07/2025 23:32

For the people saying she should respect the mums wishes and not post her daughter in the background, she has respected her wishes by completely blurring out her face, it's literally not a picture of her daughter anymore.

TheCraftyPoet · 05/07/2025 23:36

cottoncandy260 · 05/07/2025 23:22

You’re absolutely right regarding DV etc. But how can a parent possibly control for this if their child takes part in a public sporting event? There will be scores of photos taken with many uploaded to social media. It’s impossible to police.

It is impossible to police, but in this case the mother of the child has asked that it not be posted. I don’t understand why anyone wouldn’t respect this, even if they think it’s daft.

TheCraftyPoet · 05/07/2025 23:41

Spudthespanner · 05/07/2025 23:26

The child is cropped and blurred from the photo. This is sufficient. What’s left of her face is distorted by blurring such that it is not there anymore. There is no chance whatsoever that someone will be taking that image and using advanced software to try and de-blur the child’s face ffs, even if they could manage it well enough to see anything close to the original image.

OP’s friend’s concerns are hysterical.

We have adopted children in my family who cannot have images online, and no one would be so ridiculously hysterical as to see a cropped and blurred image of their child in the background of a photo as a possible risk.

The OP has ensured the child’s anonymity.

The friend also cannot control her child’s image appearing in hundreds of photos, in the background of strangers snapping away in public. That’s life. The whole thing is utterly ridiculous. OP has made the effort to remove the child from the photo and if the friend can’t handle the fact that her left knee is still visible then she needs to get a serious grip.

You don’t know that. You don’t know anybody’s situation. And it’s not “advanced software”, it’s very basic and takes seconds.

I’m a professional photojournalist with the required legal and ethical training. It is legal to take photos in a public place, including of children, and the photographer owns all rights and can do as they please with that photograph. But I wouldn’t dream of refusing a request to remove/not use a photo of somebody/their child (unless it was in the public interest for the photo to be published).

Spudthespanner · 05/07/2025 23:54

TheCraftyPoet · 05/07/2025 23:41

You don’t know that. You don’t know anybody’s situation. And it’s not “advanced software”, it’s very basic and takes seconds.

I’m a professional photojournalist with the required legal and ethical training. It is legal to take photos in a public place, including of children, and the photographer owns all rights and can do as they please with that photograph. But I wouldn’t dream of refusing a request to remove/not use a photo of somebody/their child (unless it was in the public interest for the photo to be published).

OP hasn’t refused. She has very kindly cropped and blurred the photo. That’s plenty.

TheCraftyPoet · 06/07/2025 00:02

Spudthespanner · 05/07/2025 23:54

OP hasn’t refused. She has very kindly cropped and blurred the photo. That’s plenty.

I’ve given reasons as to why it’s not in fact “plenty”. The simplest and most reasonable solution is to respect the mother’s wishes and either remove the daughter completely from the image (actually quite easy on Photoshop) or remove the image from the social media platform.

wombat1a · 06/07/2025 00:07

Just reply saying "Brilliant, the cropping and bluring worked then"

and leave it at that.

Spudthespanner · 06/07/2025 00:22

TheCraftyPoet · 06/07/2025 00:02

I’ve given reasons as to why it’s not in fact “plenty”. The simplest and most reasonable solution is to respect the mother’s wishes and either remove the daughter completely from the image (actually quite easy on Photoshop) or remove the image from the social media platform.

The world doesn’t work that way and the friend’s request after the OP has removed her daughter from the photo is unreasonable.

Read the OP again. She is absolutely being unreasonable. Given this is a sporting event, this child will be in other parents’ photos who likely will have them online. She puts them online herself. The child is an arm, a leg, and half a blurred face. It is utterly ridiculous.

The reasoning? “People who know they’re on the same team will know it’s her.”

Jesus Christ 🙄

Spudthespanner · 06/07/2025 00:23

wombat1a · 06/07/2025 00:07

Just reply saying "Brilliant, the cropping and bluring worked then"

and leave it at that.

This.

aWeeCornishPastie · 06/07/2025 00:35

Don’t remove it she’s being a dick

dizzydizzydizzy · 06/07/2025 08:32

You were being reasonable. Ignore the woman.

Ilovelurchers · 06/07/2025 08:40

midlifesharp · 02/07/2025 18:07

I do get that parents should have the first and only call about pics of their children. I’m just sad because it’s such great pic and DD tried and trained so hard and frankly never wins or gets recognised.

I don't agree, actually - I think the child's view is much more important than the parent's at this point. I always check for my daughter's permission before posting any pics of her now she is old enough to give it (and she pretty much always says no!)

You mention checking with the mom, but did you check with the child? Could it be the child who objects, and he mom is trying to protect her feelings? Kids at that age can be very self conscious - I can imagine my daughter, in some frames of mine, objecting to a pic being poster of her even if it was not identifying......

ZippyBrick · 06/07/2025 11:25

midlifesharp · 02/07/2025 17:49

DD competes in a sport. She’s ok but has never won anything. She enjoys it though. She’s trained a lot recently and had a competition I was able to attend - and she won!!! I managed to snap a once in a lifetime action shot of her doing so as well.

I have a very small private Facebook - fewer than 100 people. Family, friends and a few school parents. I wanted to post the picture, mainly for the older relatives. Now, also visible in shot was DDs friend, coming in behind her. Friend is lovely, mum is a little difficult. She’s super crunchy and quick to share her views. I checked with her before posting the picture as her child was also in it, not expecting any problems as she regularly posts her own pictures of her children. However she said that she didn’t want her daughter on anyone else’s social media -so I posted the picture with her daughter cropped out as much as possible and with the remaining half of her face blurred.
She’s now messaged me asking me to remove the whole picture as people who know the girls compete in the same team could guess that it’s her daughter. You cannot tell it’s her daughter at all! It’s half a blurred face, an arm and a leg.

Am I right to be a bit cross or have I misjudged a parenting/ privacy issue?

Hold on, you've said in the post that she's upset that people will "guess it's her daughter".

The issue here is nothing to do with privacy, her pride is hurt and she doesnt want people to see her DD losing to yours.

Marieb19 · 06/07/2025 16:05

As long as her daughter is not recognisable she has nothing to complain about. Block her from your SM and post it.

midlifesharp · 06/07/2025 19:06

wombat1a · 06/07/2025 00:07

Just reply saying "Brilliant, the cropping and bluring worked then"

and leave it at that.

I wish I’d have done this!

i left the thread as there were lots of people telling me to just disguise the girl (I already had!) and it got a bit wearing.
instead I found my spine and responded that her daughter was totally obscured and I felt that was sufficient.
She read and ignored me.

Ive stopped her viewing my posts and and I’ve stopped seeing her adverts on insta (including photos of her kids) so I think she blocked me as well. Winning.

OP posts:
PopeJoan2 · 06/07/2025 19:21

I think you should have respected her op and done what she asked. What you said to her sounds unpleasant (I am convinced that you are not an unpleasant person)?and I am sure she is wondering why you even asked her for permission in the first place.

Spudthespanner · 06/07/2025 19:28

midlifesharp · 06/07/2025 19:06

I wish I’d have done this!

i left the thread as there were lots of people telling me to just disguise the girl (I already had!) and it got a bit wearing.
instead I found my spine and responded that her daughter was totally obscured and I felt that was sufficient.
She read and ignored me.

Ive stopped her viewing my posts and and I’ve stopped seeing her adverts on insta (including photos of her kids) so I think she blocked me as well. Winning.

Good for you OP. Honestly, fuck her. She’s completely unreasonable however many people want you photoshopping the picture to oblivion to appease her. You’ve done enough and she’s proper fucking batshit.

HiEarthlings · 06/07/2025 22:18

Mrsttcno1 · 02/07/2025 18:05

You’d advise overruling a mothers wishes about her own child being on social media, rather than OP simply sending the photo to her relatives rather than posting it online? What strange advice for another mum to give!

But it's no longer a photo of her child as OP has removed as much as she can and then blurred out the rest! She's doing nothing wrong.

Dramatic · 06/07/2025 23:05

PopeJoan2 · 06/07/2025 19:21

I think you should have respected her op and done what she asked. What you said to her sounds unpleasant (I am convinced that you are not an unpleasant person)?and I am sure she is wondering why you even asked her for permission in the first place.

How many people are going to say this 🤦 she literally has done as the woman asked.

WildCats24 · 07/07/2025 11:06

PopeJoan2 · 06/07/2025 19:21

I think you should have respected her op and done what she asked. What you said to her sounds unpleasant (I am convinced that you are not an unpleasant person)?and I am sure she is wondering why you even asked her for permission in the first place.

OP asked if it was okay to have the girl in the background, the woman said no, so OP blurred out the girl’s face and hair before posting.

PopeJoan2 · 07/07/2025 20:53

HereWeGo1234 · 03/07/2025 18:31

I would remove it.

So would I. Why is it so important to post it?

AtomHeartMotherOfGod · 07/07/2025 21:14

Iwillclasptheeagain · 02/07/2025 18:01

I think YABU, sorry.

There is no point ascertaining someone's wishes if you just plan to ignore them.

She sounds like a responsible mother who perhaps appreciates the various risks of having your child's photo online better than you do, questions of consent aside.

Agree... but what I don't agree with is that OP has ignored the mother. The girl is not recognisable (at least, to people who don't know her IRL), nor is her image able to be used by a randomer on the net. These are the two reasons people restrict pictures aren't they?

I completely agree that the woman is just sore because she doesn't want anyone to know her DD failed.

Reminds me of this...

DeeKitch · 01/09/2025 16:55

If you send the pic I’ll see if I can remove other kids for you

DeeKitch · 01/09/2025 16:56

DeeKitch · 01/09/2025 16:55

If you send the pic I’ll see if I can remove other kids for you

Or download this - you can skip joining and can do a couple of things per day for free

Was I unreasonable to post this picture (privacy)
NJC7 · 01/09/2025 17:29

You should be able to use your phone to edit the photo by scribbling thoroughly over the whole image of her child. So rather than just the face if you see what I mean

TheTallgiraffe · 01/09/2025 23:08

DeeKitch · 01/09/2025 16:55

If you send the pic I’ll see if I can remove other kids for you

If the OP's friend doesn't want her daughter's photo posted by others she probably doesn't want it sent to a stranger either, or uploaded to a photo edit website.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page