Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

MIL guilt tripping me for divorcing husband when he might lose his job

186 replies

Chambers9 · 23/05/2025 22:50

I told my husband earlier this week that I want a divorce. Background, he told me out of the blue that he faces yet another disciplinary at work and given he was issued a final warning last year, it’s likely he will be dismissed.

I gave him an ultimatum at that time that if he did anything like that again to risk his job, I’d leave him. He works in an industry where you have to give references and disclose any dismissals if applying for a new role so he would never find new work.

He works for a big local employer for which I have friends who work in other departments. He lied to me about the reason for the final warning and I found out weeks later (from a friend) the real reason. It was humiliating for me as it was due to a remark he made to a female colleague on a night out. I was very close to walking away then.

This latest incident relates to inappropriate comments he has made (again when drunk!) on the team WhatsApp group. I cannot believe he has been so stupid.

He has obviously told his mum as I’ve had a barrage of messages tonight - I’m overreacting and heartless for kicking a man when he’s down, I should be fighting his corner, his workplace are pandering to the ‘modern worker’ whatever the hell that means.

I’m standing firm and want out.

OP posts:
2ndbestslayer · 24/05/2025 08:26

He won't be able to 'argue his case'. He should look at the guidance on harassment on Acas.

Even if the comments weren't directed at the women in the chat, it creates a 'degrading environment' for them to work in.

Rosscameasdoody · 24/05/2025 08:26

Chambers9 · 24/05/2025 08:22

The final warning was due to telling a female colleague on a team night out that he’d never worked with someone so ‘fuckable’ and that she was wasted in their line of work (charming, I know).

The latest incident - obviously I’ve only got his word for it, and he has lied before. But he tells me he is being 100% truthful.

There was a few of them messaging in the team WA group during/after a football match last weekend (he was watching in a pub with mates so drink involved again). One of them supports a team who lost. DH directed a message at him which was a version of ‘just get your DP to suck you off to cheer you up’.

He says the colleague he directed it at laughed it off and wasn’t offended. But he forgets he said this in a group with all of his colleagues, including females, and was notified of complaints and a disciplinary procedure earlier in the week.

He thinks he can argue his case about the latest incident as the collleague wasn’t offended but I don’t care either way - he has risked his employment and the roof over our head and he knew my position on this.

i think you’re wise to be getting out OP. Sounds like you’ve put up with so much shit in the past. The fact that he’s focused on ‘arguing his case’ rather than learning the lesson says it all.

Bunnycat101 · 24/05/2025 08:27

Oh OP I’m sorry- those messages are bloody awful and I can’t believe he’s digging in that he’s fine on this because the colleague wasn’t offended. He’s been so stupid and also disrespectful to you.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 24/05/2025 08:27

Hulabalu · 23/05/2025 22:54

YANBU, but if he has alcohol problem then company should offer support as this is a disability

No it isn't. It is possible that substantial and long-term physical or mental impairment from using drugs or alcohol may be classed as a disability. Being an idiot who can't hold their drink isn't. Harassing others isn't.

Hulabalu · 24/05/2025 08:28

Rosscameasdoody · 24/05/2025 08:22

Then the applicable diagnosis affording protection under the Equality Act wouldn’t be alcohol related - it would be whatever mental health condition is diagnosed, providing it meets the definition of disability under the Act. And if it doesn’t cause a problem unless he drinks, then it doesn’t meet the definition of long term and significantly impacting normal daily activity. So still not a disability.

Edited

What if the problem is that he drinks too much every day due to MH & can’t stop ?

GoodCharl · 24/05/2025 08:29

He sounds like a liability. You are definitely making the right decision. Ignore his mummy. Shes probably scared that hes going to turn up on her doorstep shortly!

CapitalAtRisk · 24/05/2025 08:31

Sounds like you're better off without both of them, OP!

ExercicenformedeZ · 24/05/2025 08:31

Good for you. Sounds as if dear Mother is the reason why he is so entitled. Behind (almost) every nightmare man, there is a pandering, enabling mother. Ditch the dead wood and make sure that he doesn't drag you down financially.

Sapana · 24/05/2025 08:32

ItsMutinyontheBunty · 23/05/2025 22:59

In retrospect, the flaw in the plan was saying you’d leave if it happened again..because it was very likely to happen again and at that point he’d get sacked, so you’re not just ending it but ending it when he’s about to lose his job. But no, you aren’t unreasonable to want to end this. He sounds awful. He’s made bad choices and will have to live with the consequences.

It's not a flaw in the plan, it's a boundary. If that means she's leaving as he has lost himself his job that's not her fucking problem.

DrummingMousWife · 24/05/2025 08:34

Mil is freaking out she is going to be stuck with him!

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 24/05/2025 08:35

Chambers9 · 24/05/2025 08:22

The final warning was due to telling a female colleague on a team night out that he’d never worked with someone so ‘fuckable’ and that she was wasted in their line of work (charming, I know).

The latest incident - obviously I’ve only got his word for it, and he has lied before. But he tells me he is being 100% truthful.

There was a few of them messaging in the team WA group during/after a football match last weekend (he was watching in a pub with mates so drink involved again). One of them supports a team who lost. DH directed a message at him which was a version of ‘just get your DP to suck you off to cheer you up’.

He says the colleague he directed it at laughed it off and wasn’t offended. But he forgets he said this in a group with all of his colleagues, including females, and was notified of complaints and a disciplinary procedure earlier in the week.

He thinks he can argue his case about the latest incident as the collleague wasn’t offended but I don’t care either way - he has risked his employment and the roof over our head and he knew my position on this.

What he is failing to understand here is that even if the person he was speaking to wasn't offended, the women he works with do not want to have to deal with comments like that in their workplace. And the team WhatsApp group is an extension of their workplace.

If there are no consequences for his behaviour, the message these women will get is that the business is completely OK with him talking about women like that, and that if they are uncomfortable with it they need to go and work somewhere else that has a more respectful culture.

It's going to be far easier for the business to replace one wanker man (especially one who is already on a final warning and can be fired pretty easily by this point) than to replace half the team after they resign in disgust. And that's assuming that they don't resign and bring claims for constructive dismissal, citing the misogynistic and sexually predatory culture in the workplace, perpetuated by one or two male staff members, which management failed to deal with.

It's clear from your posts that his employers do not want him anymore, he's more trouble to them than he is worth, and because they have been following the correct disciplinary procedures after his previous behaviour and he's had plenty of warnings, if he gets fired this time he will not have a legal leg to stand on.

As for your MIL, "stand by your man" is all very well when your man is not at fault, or even if he's made one silly mistake. But this isn't one mistake, this is a pattern of behaviour which isn't going to change. Your self respect would have to be in the toilet for you to remain married to a man with so little respect for women, let alone have to shoulder the financial consequences of him repeatedly getting fired and finding it harder and harder to get and keep employment.

ThatsNotMyTeen · 24/05/2025 08:37

I heard a great line this week which may apply to OP’s H

”being an arsehole isn’t a protected characteristic “

2ndbestslayer · 24/05/2025 08:39

Hulabalu · 24/05/2025 08:28

What if the problem is that he drinks too much every day due to MH & can’t stop ?

What about the women who are on the receiving end of this behaviour? Should they just put up with it because he may have mental health issues? What about THEIR mental health?
If he's had a warning before and is employed by a large company it's entirely possible he would have been pointed towards some sort of Employee Assistance Programme anyway. He's been given a second chance by his wife and his employer and could have sought help then. Are people supposed to put up with awful behaviour indefinitely just in case someone may have a mental health problem?

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 24/05/2025 08:39

ItsMutinyontheBunty · 23/05/2025 22:59

In retrospect, the flaw in the plan was saying you’d leave if it happened again..because it was very likely to happen again and at that point he’d get sacked, so you’re not just ending it but ending it when he’s about to lose his job. But no, you aren’t unreasonable to want to end this. He sounds awful. He’s made bad choices and will have to live with the consequences.

How is that a flaw in the plan? She's not cruelly kicking him while he's down by leaving him just when he's about to get fired.

She's leaving him for the same reason that he is about to get fired: his completely unacceptable behaviour.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 24/05/2025 08:41

Hulabalu · 24/05/2025 08:28

What if the problem is that he drinks too much every day due to MH & can’t stop ?

Then he can take advantage of his imminent unemployed and homeless status to go to rehab. If MIL dearest wants to be supportive, she can pay for it, and let him move home afterwards.

C8H10N4O2 · 24/05/2025 08:51

Hulabalu · 24/05/2025 08:28

What if the problem is that he drinks too much every day due to MH & can’t stop ?

What about the well being and MH of the women who have to work with and potentially for a predatory creep?

I’ve never met a man who was a drunken or unwell creep who didn’t hold exactly the same mind set when sober and keeping a lid on it. His problem is that he is a predatory creep. The company’s problem is that a predatory creep disrupts the workplace.

The company will solve their problem and protect their wider staff by getting rid of him. He won’t be able to solve his problem until he acknowledges he has one (with womne) and stops playing the victim.

C8H10N4O2 · 24/05/2025 08:53

Chambers9 · 24/05/2025 08:25

It’s a combination - I was disgusted by the comment which led to the final warning, and lies from him. That this also put our security at risk was what led to me issuing the ultimatum. There had been a couple of separate issues prior to this which probably got me to that position.

This sounds as if there have been problems for a very long time and this was the final straw. Just how long have you been putting up with this kind of behaviour, not to mention the mindset behind it?

myheadsjustmush · 24/05/2025 09:02

Shesellsseashellsnotinmystreet · 23/05/2025 22:53

Who the fuck are the 25%saying Yabu??

It's probably the MIL.....🤣

Rosscameasdoody · 24/05/2025 09:05

Hulabalu · 24/05/2025 08:28

What if the problem is that he drinks too much every day due to MH & can’t stop ?

Then again, it’s the MH problem that’s the disability and not the alcohol/drug use. Unless alcoholism/drug addiction has caused significant physical or MH issues sufficient to meet the definition of disability they are not covered by the Act. Simply being an alcoholic/addict is not a disability in itself. The only specific exception to this is where an addiction has arisen as a result of treatment for a medical condition, such as addiction to painkillers after surgery or an accident. The Act would give some protection depending on the circumstances.

Fgfgfg · 24/05/2025 09:06

HelenaWaiting · 24/05/2025 00:02

MS isn't classified as a disability under the Equality Act. Or cerebral palsy. In fact it doesn't give a list of conditions that are "classified" as disabilities at all. It simply states that a disability is "a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on a person's ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities". So alcohol addiction could be considered a disability.

This is wrong.
Sch1, Para 6 Equality Act 2010 - MS is classed as a disability from the date of diagnosis.
Section 3 of the 60 page Equality Act 2010 (Disability) Regulations 2010 explicitly excludes addictions.
Employers may treat it as a welfare issue and support the employee but it's not a disability and there's no legal requirement to support.

Onedayiwillsomething · 24/05/2025 09:11

Years ago I decided that things weren’t working with a (lovely) ex. The day I d was going to break up with him he told me he lost his job. I decided I couldn’t break up with him when he was unemployed. Three months later he still hadn’t found another job, and I ended it. In the end he was unemployed for 18 months.

If you don’t want to be in a relationship you can end it. He and his family sound stressful and draining. You don’t need to see him through this, you’ll be financially supporting someone you don’t see a future with and you have no idea how long for.

Rainingthankgoodness · 24/05/2025 09:14

2ndbestslayer · 24/05/2025 08:26

He won't be able to 'argue his case'. He should look at the guidance on harassment on Acas.

Even if the comments weren't directed at the women in the chat, it creates a 'degrading environment' for them to work in.

I think the fact OP's H doesn't apparently understand this even when he's sober shows how ingrained his attitude to women is.
It's not an out of character thing he does when he's drunk, it's how he is normally.
I really shudder to think what his conversation is like when he is out with his male friends.

user8642096713 · 24/05/2025 09:19

A mother is always on their child side.
However neither of them will be your circus if you carry on with the separation so he’s her problem now!

WestwardHo1 · 24/05/2025 09:21

Hulabalu · 23/05/2025 22:54

YANBU, but if he has alcohol problem then company should offer support as this is a disability

Is there ANYTHING that people won't try and claim victimhood for?

Is being a knob when pissed a disability? How can a company "support" someone into being less of a twat? They're not his parents and he's not 15.

SmoothRoads · 24/05/2025 09:24

Shesellsseashellsnotinmystreet · 23/05/2025 22:53

Who the fuck are the 25%saying Yabu??

Must be MRA's. Thankfully it's only 2% now.