Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Clarks WTAF?

211 replies

Bananararity · 17/05/2025 16:20

90% of my work shores are from Clarks and have been for years. I get this is a collaboration but honestly? Or am I really out of touch and this is what I need to be wearing.

Absolutely love the shade of blue though.

www.clarks.com/en-gb/Martine-Rose-Heel-Womens/26183327-p

OP posts:
Teddy1949 · 20/05/2025 19:32

Are they meant to be a work of art, you certainly couldn’t wear them without them looking even more tatty within the day.

8u5W8nk3r · 20/05/2025 22:28

Has anyone said yet that the brown ones look like a pasty?

Picklelily99 · 21/05/2025 01:04

My god, they see us coming sometimes, don't they? The gullible, the fool who is easily parted from their money, the simpleton who will buy what she's been told is the new 'must have'.

BIossomtoes · 21/05/2025 09:03

The woman who likes sometimes a bit different and doesn’t want to look like everyone else. God forbid that we shouldn’t all be sheep.

AngryLikeHades · 21/05/2025 10:06

LittleBearPad · 18/05/2025 07:36

They’re to generate interest from fashion press. They won’t sell many but they don’t intend to. They’ve achieved one of their aims through this thread which is to drive clicks to their website.

You may well be tight about that, but why do they not intend to sell any? They are ugly as f!

lilacmamacat · 21/05/2025 10:47

PansyPottering · 17/05/2025 17:59

Wowzers. 😵 I hope my algorithm isn’t going to be fucked after looking at those!

Cant believe these snake skin boomerang heeled loafers are in the sale.

Those are hilarious. Is anyone going to even buy them in the sale?

lilacmamacat · 21/05/2025 10:50

Pretty colour, and would be a reasonable shape if all that dross was trimmed off, but as they are, they look like the sole is two sizes bigger that the shoe. Tops marks for the designer bullshit description though.

Padloque · 21/05/2025 12:52

The thing is, though, they're not really meant to be SHOE shoes. They're a visual statement that, hey, Clarks are down with high-concept fashion designers, who in turn take Clarks seriously, OK? Look, we're still at the forefront of the cordwaining industry! They're not expecting you to buy them to wear to a wedding in St Mary Mead (although if you love them...). At £250 a go, they've probably made 3 in each size, and sent 2 of those 3 pairs to influencers.

It's like when Fiat unveils a car that runs on pinot grigio at a motor show, or McDonalds develops a burger made from locusts - it's to prove they can, and to make you talk about how clever it is. I don't know if they've hit a bit of a bum note with this particular concept, in the current economic climate.

Greyexpectations · 21/05/2025 13:03

Padloque · 21/05/2025 12:52

The thing is, though, they're not really meant to be SHOE shoes. They're a visual statement that, hey, Clarks are down with high-concept fashion designers, who in turn take Clarks seriously, OK? Look, we're still at the forefront of the cordwaining industry! They're not expecting you to buy them to wear to a wedding in St Mary Mead (although if you love them...). At £250 a go, they've probably made 3 in each size, and sent 2 of those 3 pairs to influencers.

It's like when Fiat unveils a car that runs on pinot grigio at a motor show, or McDonalds develops a burger made from locusts - it's to prove they can, and to make you talk about how clever it is. I don't know if they've hit a bit of a bum note with this particular concept, in the current economic climate.

No one is making concept shoes at £250.

I have some mad impractical but beautiful (and uncomfortable) hiking boots that were sold for nearly £1000. They were a gift from a friend who worked at the brand, because I’m not insane, but £250 is nothing.

Even a pair of fugly Nike trainers is over £150 these days, and they are mass produced.

cumbriaisbest · 21/05/2025 13:57

Bananararity · 17/05/2025 16:55

I’m actually angered by them. If they were the usual court shoe they do in that colour with a heel I’d have bought them - probably two of them. But they’ve taken something that usually sells and made it look as though it’s been jammed in a door. Any they trebled the price.

Who is the target market here?

Crazy people?

cumbriaisbest · 21/05/2025 13:58

A concept shoe? For God's sake.

TheLeadbetterLife · 21/05/2025 14:40

I like them!

Wouldn't wear them myself as I can't do any kind of heel, but the overall look is fun.

HomericEpithet · 21/05/2025 19:41

Concept shoes are for people who don't spend enough time on their feet. [judgy]

Fascinate · 21/05/2025 19:43

Fuck, they're ugly.

nadine90 · 21/05/2025 22:06

It’s giving “I had loo roll stuck on my shoe and attempted to pull it off with the other but it all got a bit stuck round the edges”. What on earth are they thinking?

davidtennantstattoo · 22/05/2025 12:14

It’s like the emperor’s new clothes.

Fraaances · 22/05/2025 12:45

It’s giving Bayou Speakeasy Chic - perfect for a crawdad broil

Shinyinlay · 22/05/2025 12:51

This must be how my late mum felt when she saw ripped jeans, brand new, hanging up in the shops.

BobbyBiscuits · 22/05/2025 13:17

I think they're fantastic! ❤️

NotQuiteUsual · 22/05/2025 13:27

I rather like them. Then again my tastes are questionable at best.

Loverofoldfilms · 22/05/2025 19:34

Try taking these to a charity shop. They would send you away... and tell you to dispose. Yikes!

Flyswats · 23/05/2025 04:20

It would help if they'd photographed these shoes on a human foot. Context is everything. I am guessing they are going for "shabby chic" but I think they're hideous, personally.

malificent7 · 23/05/2025 05:25

Noone wears heels any more surely? Very dated.

Nettleteaser101 · 23/05/2025 09:28

They look like the heel fell off and has been put on in the wrong place. Why are Clarks so expensive.