Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not be happy that my new work lanyard has “she/her” on it without me asking?

264 replies

TheNavyAnt · 29/04/2025 09:03

I’ve just started a new job and noticed that my staff lanyard/pass automatically has my name and “she/her” printed underneath it. Nobody asked if I wanted pronouns added - it was just assumed and put there by default.

I don’t have anything against people sharing pronouns if they want to, but personally, I wouldn’t have chosen to have it printed on my pass. It feels a bit forced, like I’m being made to take part in something I didn’t ask for and I’m not sure why it needs to be there at all unless I choose it.

AIBU to feel slightly uncomfortable about this? Or should I just let it go as one of those “modern workplace” things?

OP posts:
Northerngirl821 · 29/04/2025 12:48

I told HR that I was still at a very difficult stage in my gender identity journey and I didn’t feel comfortable publicly disclosing my preferred pronouns just yet, and that being given an unsolicited badge with pronouns on was actually very triggering to my mental health…

They apologised and gave me a new badge without pronouns on and pronouns are now optional instead of being enforced!

Lentilweaver · 29/04/2025 12:51

I have a "foreign" name, and people often misgender me on the phone or in emails. I just politely correct them. No problem, no hurty feelings.
I would rather they misgender me than call myself she/her.

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 29/04/2025 12:52

Ladybuglamp · 29/04/2025 09:51

Are you a she/her? If so, I don’t understand what the issue is?
It’s helpful for colleagues to know how you like to be referred to. No different from having your name printed on the badge.
I’m sure HR will remove it if you’re genuinely that bothered about people thinking you’re a woman.
I find it really helpful at work (There is a trans woman at my work and not to sound mean, but I would have just assumed she was a he/him if she didn’t have her pronouns in email sig - and I could have ended up really hurting her feelings)

The issue is that we aren't asked to add any other protected characteristics to our emails or work passes.

MargaritaPracticallyCan · 29/04/2025 12:57

We were given the option of adding pronouns to email signatures. I opted not to. I don't use them in real life, I respect others choose to and would use someone's preferred pronouns out of courtesy if it came up. Which it rarely does. But I choose not to use pronouns personally or professionally.

Gretnaglebe · 29/04/2025 13:00

Tippex

Throckmorton · 29/04/2025 13:01

Cassoppy · 29/04/2025 12:03

I like pronouns, when included discretely, on an email signature as, like a previous poster said, when you have emails from many other countries it can help to build a picture of the sender more quickly and support the language used when referring to them.

However they seem entirely redundant on a pass and UANBU to complain that they both made an unprofessional assumption and decided it was appropriate to publicise it without your consent.

I think it would be perfectly reasonable to go back, point this out, and ask for a corrected pass.

"it can help to build a picture of the sender more quickly" - is exactly why I don't support the use of pronouns in email signatures. I don't want people building a picture of me before they've interacted with me - it encourages pictures based on prejudices, of which there are many about women.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 29/04/2025 13:01

Throckmorton
It beggars belief that people feel they need to know the sex of their colleagues in order to work with them.

It beggars belief even more that there are people in newsgroups who, if it is not immediately obvious which sex someone is, nidget and pry and go on at them about their sex, and imply that they are unreasonable for not stating it. I watched one such little git doing this on a list I am on, when it is absolutely none of her (she is clear about that) business and the person she was having a go at has said more than once that they don't wish to state their sex.

Throckmorton · 29/04/2025 13:02

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 29/04/2025 13:01

Throckmorton
It beggars belief that people feel they need to know the sex of their colleagues in order to work with them.

It beggars belief even more that there are people in newsgroups who, if it is not immediately obvious which sex someone is, nidget and pry and go on at them about their sex, and imply that they are unreasonable for not stating it. I watched one such little git doing this on a list I am on, when it is absolutely none of her (she is clear about that) business and the person she was having a go at has said more than once that they don't wish to state their sex.

Urg! People can be AWFUL!

Derbee · 29/04/2025 13:03

I wonder how safe you are to complain, in a new job?

I’d be annoyed, and prefer not to wear it. I ignore all of this pronoun nonsense. I only use they/them for referring to multiple people, not an individual.

EBearhug · 29/04/2025 13:03

LittleBitofBread · 29/04/2025 12:30

Some people do have bollocks like 'she'/'they' 🙄

If they're choosing that, it needs clarification- do they mean she when it's the subject, they when it's object (in which case, why not them?) or you can happily switch between she and they, which rather negates the whole linguistic purpose of pronouns, or should you choose one and stick with it?

Though if you choose something like zie, you probably do need to give the entire declension, because you won't have learnt it, whether it's your first language or as a foreign language.

I did have American colleagues who put "she/her/ella" and I was tempted to put my pronouns in a whole range of different languages.

JumpingPumpkin · 29/04/2025 13:06

ilovesooty · 29/04/2025 09:24

If everyone else has them and it's company policy I don't see what the big deal is. I certainly wouldn't be making waves in a new job. They should have confirmed them with you though not made assumptions.

It insulting to people who prefer people to use pronouns normally (based on perception) like me who actively don’t want anyone to think I have chosen “she/her”, I simply am female so she and her are appropriate without my choice.

It’s equally as insulting to the pronoun people who want to actively express a preference. It’s ridiculous, but say you did prefer “they”, how awkward that HR didn’t check first but just assumed.

LittleBitofBread · 29/04/2025 13:06

EBearhug · 29/04/2025 13:03

If they're choosing that, it needs clarification- do they mean she when it's the subject, they when it's object (in which case, why not them?) or you can happily switch between she and they, which rather negates the whole linguistic purpose of pronouns, or should you choose one and stick with it?

Though if you choose something like zie, you probably do need to give the entire declension, because you won't have learnt it, whether it's your first language or as a foreign language.

I did have American colleagues who put "she/her/ella" and I was tempted to put my pronouns in a whole range of different languages.

do they mean she when it's the subject, they when it's object (in which case, why not them?) or you can happily switch between she and they, which rather negates the whole linguistic purpose of pronouns, or should you choose one and stick with it?
I mean, fuck knows, and also imagine the arrogance needed to ask people to wonder about all that shite?

Stuck84 · 29/04/2025 13:08

Ladybuglamp · 29/04/2025 09:51

Are you a she/her? If so, I don’t understand what the issue is?
It’s helpful for colleagues to know how you like to be referred to. No different from having your name printed on the badge.
I’m sure HR will remove it if you’re genuinely that bothered about people thinking you’re a woman.
I find it really helpful at work (There is a trans woman at my work and not to sound mean, but I would have just assumed she was a he/him if she didn’t have her pronouns in email sig - and I could have ended up really hurting her feelings)

I personally am quite happy to call anyone by their preferred pronouns as I really don't see it as impinging on me in any way. But I would still challenge this as it should be personal choice- people may be 'gender fluid' or may be questioning their gender and may not know how to identify. Or they may not be open about their gender identity in a work setting because they're concerned how people might react. Never mind that it shouldn't be assumed on your behalf. So I would go back and say it should be personal preference.

Crikeyalmighty · 29/04/2025 13:08

yep it’s nuts and I say this as a centre left and pretty liberal minded person - I personally think if you go too far catering for every gender obsession you end up with far too many thinking people like Trump and Farage are talking sense - even a stopped clock is right twice a day even if the rest of what they say is populist bullshit. If a person is called Sarah - then regardless of whether they are born Sarah or Simon then we can safely presume they wish to be known as a she/her regardless of whether they were born that way -

Trabbling · 29/04/2025 13:10

CaptainAwkward · 29/04/2025 09:06

It's the equivalent of being ascribed a religious title when you're an atheist in my opinion, drawn into a belief framework without consent.

And just silly

"Drawn into a belief framework without consent" - this is so perfectly put. I love it when someone articulates my feelings so well ❤️

Darkgreendarkbark · 29/04/2025 13:10

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 29/04/2025 12:52

The issue is that we aren't asked to add any other protected characteristics to our emails or work passes.

Pronouns aren't a protected characteristic. I know gender reassignment is, but if someone has that protected characteristic and is already signing themself off as "Samantha", then adding "she/her" gives nothing new away.

Disclaimer, I hate the whole pronoun business and don't partake in it.

BlueRaincoat1 · 29/04/2025 13:13

I really don't agree with the compulsory sharing of pronouns on lanyards or emails.
We don't share any other identifying data about ourselves in general on email signatures or on lanyards, most people don't use a title (like Ms /Mr) although perhaps that would be a better idea if people wanted to signal their gender preference, rather than pronouns.
We don't state our sex, nationality, race, if we are disabled (unless relevant for communication purposes), our sexual orientation etc on emails or lanyards. As has been repeatedly observed above, we don't tend to use third person pronouns when speaking to someone directly, so really how relevant is this for most people. If it is important to an individual then they can have it but it is weird and inappropriate to force 'identifiers' on people without reason or consent.

HPFA · 29/04/2025 13:15

Yet again a case of people not really believing the thing they're told to believe.

Anyone who really did believe it would not dream of assigning pronouns to you without asking.

ThatsNotMyTeen · 29/04/2025 13:15

I’d also ask HR if it could be issued without the pronouns

LillyPJ · 29/04/2025 13:27

Sharpie, tipped or sticker. I feel similarly annoyed about having to provide a title on forms. It's unnecessary and unhelpful.

YankeeDad · 29/04/2025 13:29

To all the posters suggesting any sort of snarky or even polite complaint, what if @TheNavyAnt needs / wants to keep this new job? There is clearly a power dynamic being exploited by someone by including these on a pass for a new joiner, because any sort of reaction could label her as a “difficult person” and lead to her being quickly managed out.

The power dynamic will shift somewhat in her favour when the probationary period has passed, especially if she also has strong performance reviews. But it does also depend on who wanted the pronouns on the badges, and whether senior leadership has bought in to doing this.

A pragmatic solution might be to cover the pronouns with a Sharpie or a white sticker, but only after the probationary period has ended.

OutandAboutMum1821 · 29/04/2025 13:29

It is ridiculous OP, stating the obvious and completely over the top. I think the onus to have pronouns on a badge should be on people who are not using the obvious, not everybody who is perfectly happy with the status quo.

I would not like this, firstly because I was not even asked, and secondly, because it may make people assume that I am actually a biological male. Confusing and ridiculous!

MyZippyLemonBiscuit · 29/04/2025 13:30

Are you a female?

Jeezitneverends · 29/04/2025 13:30

DiaAssolellat · 29/04/2025 09:04

Hell would freeze over before I wore this.

Perfectly put. I’d see them at a tribunal before I’d accept this nonsense.

Gettingbysomehow · 29/04/2025 13:33

I'd be furious and I'd be sending it right back. They don't even know what your pronouns are and they didn't ask your permission to share them with all and sundry.