You keep doubling down that they are safer. Where is that data coming from that supports that? Or is that purely based on your opinion ?
Are you trying to say that female single sex toilets are dangerous for the reasons you keep mentioning such as drug deals and harassment? Or you are exaggerating the dangers of female single sex toilets with issues you see in male single sex toilets?
Because if these are issues in female single sex toilets, then we really need to understand this and deal with it pronto!
However, the communal areas in female toilets are also part of female people’s usage of female toilets.
For instance :
If all toilets had became unisex, then because there is no family toilet, I would have had a pram/pushchair wedged open for all who passed by to see me go to the toilet. So, with your design, all of a sudden we now need enough extra large cubicles too not just the usual. And would you have expected me to just not go places that didn’t have a suitably sized toilet? There are plenty of mothers out there in my area who have to do this, I don’t know of any family toilets and we shouldn’t all be using the disabled toilet with the baby changing equipment.
Female people of any age would be holding up queues in busy toilets while they dealt with stains from spills of food and drinks from children and themselves, breastmilk leaks, blood staining. I sometimes hold events and there is regularly women drying off their clothes. It takes time so all of a sudden, the queue time is lengthened.
The gap is important as I mentioned, but you dismissed with a suggestion of adding buttons and pull cords etc. How does this help with seizures that someone hasn’t got time for reaching for those things? If they had time to reach for the button, they probably had time to open the door too. Not to mention drunk or drugged women. So likely they don’t have time and no one notices they are there. 3-4 minutes and they could be beyond resuscitation.
And then there is the constant reports of men simply not bothering to shut the door because they are so used to urinals. I have seen it myself where they don’t close the door properly because when they went in there was no one around so they thought they would be finished before anyone else came. And the mess because they are so used to urinals.
Female toilet usage is different from male toilet usage. Removing female single sex spaces because of issues in male single sex spaces is harmful to female people. However, female people have already told the government and pollsters that they don’t want to lose their female single sex spaces.
So, if you have the data that shows that only unisex options are the safest mix of toilets, link it up and will should stop campaigning for our single sex toilets and spread the word that unisex is safest. I have not seen any data showing this and I looked before the consultation, so I am looking forward to it.
If the solution is, as we have been campaigning for, an additional unisex toilet or two where this can happen, and well sign posted , then everyone has options. If the issue is a regionalised one where there is drug deals and unsafe situations (and I don’t doubt these are issues that need addressing), then safety is a general focus as well and councils need to be dealing with this as well and as a priority, to ensure all toilets are safe from that type of behaviour.
But removing female single sex toilets and concerting all toilets into unisex. No.