Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Crashed a wedding brunch with son. Evicted by Sister-in-law

1000 replies

Weddingbrunchcrasher · 14/04/2025 14:05

Partner’s sister got married on Saturday. Partner asked if my 8 year old could come but was told no.

She only wanted her other brother’s daughter as a bridesmaid. Her other brother’s three stepchildren were not invited, the youngest of whom is thirteen.

I then asked her directly if I could bring him in the evening, she said that she wasn’t having an evening do but the invitation clearly went into the evening, what she said was she meant a separate evening do. No extra guests were coming in the evening.

Ex wasn’t available to look after son but he had a sleepover with a friend but they were heading off at 9:00 in the morning so I had to leave hotel to collect my son. Partner didn’t have a separate car and it didn’t occur to me that it would be a problem to head back to hotel with my son for the brunch they had arranged.

Again just did not occur to me that it would be a problem.

So we arrive and queue to get into breakfast area where I assumed brunch was but it was in a separate room and only my name was down they refused to allow my son in. I refused to leave him to go into brunch to ask if he could come in.

Partner had left phone so finally the brunch spilled out to the lawn and we joined them. We were both starving so I went to get plates. His sister came over to my son and essentially asked him to leave, sort of gently by asking him to go out on lawn with my partner. Partner left with us and we had breakfast in the pubic bit.

I actually started to cry over breakfast, then my son did. I am ashamed of myself for this.

I get I was unreasonable over wedding but the Brunch surely I wasn’t. Did I make too many assumptions?

Bride and groom have met my son. We have lived together for a year.

Partner is a bit shocked but obviously it was their actual wedding.

OP posts:
Upsidedownsides · 14/04/2025 14:18

“I didn’t see this as part of the wedding but post-wedding where it didn’t matter.”

Of course a wedding brunch, for guests of the wedding is part of the event.

Sevenandahalf · 14/04/2025 14:19

I'm reading it that the brunch was the day after the wedding.
I don't think I would have brought my child to it but I can understand why you did - it's shit you put him in the position where he cried but it's weird the bride cared enough about brunch the day after her wedding to make an 8 year old not attend.

Weddingbrunchcrasher · 14/04/2025 14:19

OK this is clear that I was out of order but I genuinely did think the brunch would be a problem.

I wasn’t crying for sympathy. I cried because I was shocked.

My partner is on my side but won’t say anything.

OP posts:
Smartiepants79 · 14/04/2025 14:19

If I’ve read this right then it wasn’t the actual wedding that you bought your son to? But the breakfast at the hotel the next morning?
Who was paying for the food at the brunch? Did you offer to pay for what your child ate? I have to say that although I disagree with child free weddings I don’t quite get why it was necessary for your son to be brought back to the hotel the next day.
Why didn’t you just go home?

Sparkletastic · 14/04/2025 14:20

It was very unreasonable of you to assume this was ok. You should have sent your apologies if you couldn’t get childcare arranged. You owe your partner’s sister an apology.

Greenqueen40 · 14/04/2025 14:20

Why would your partner say anything?? It's you that needs to apologise!

Ionacat · 14/04/2025 14:20

The brunch was part of the wedding and you needed to check first. They would have been paying for a certain number of guests and it wasn’t a free for all, hence they didn’t let him in when his name wasn’t on the list It would have been fine to bring him back and take him to the public part of the hotel and pay for brunch, and meet afterwards to travel home.

nightmarepickle2025 · 14/04/2025 14:20

I can sort of understand up until the bit where it was in a separate room, and therefore clearly invite only, at which point you should just have taken him for breakfast in the public hut and waited for your partner there.

BoredZelda · 14/04/2025 14:21

Weddingbrunchcrasher · 14/04/2025 14:15

Other children were invited, Godchildren and cousins were invited.

Was I unreasonable to think the brunch was ok? I didn’t see this as part of the wedding but post-wedding where it didn’t matter.

I would be inclined to agree with you there. The only thing I suppose would make it different if it was a venue they had hired out entirely for the weekend. But even then, it’s a pretty shitty thing to do to exclude a kid from this part of the next day when the only reason he was there was for logistics.

Meadowfinch · 14/04/2025 14:21

It was her wedding, you asked and she said no. What didn't you understand?

Perhaps there was a H&S limit on the number of attendees and you breached it. YABVU.

ReesesCupcake · 14/04/2025 14:21

You asked, and were given a clear “no”, but you still took him to the wedding brunch?

Of course YABU.

JackieDaytonaLuckyBrews · 14/04/2025 14:21

You embarrassed your son and upset yourself. You were told that your son wasn't invited. You tried to shoe horn him in to a part of the wedding. It's your fault.

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 14/04/2025 14:21

I know this was the following morning but you were also aware it was a private function not public as they wouldn't let your son into the area as he wasn't on the list. That was the point to go to the public area for food for you both. You owe a massive apology.

Upsidedownsides · 14/04/2025 14:21

Weddingbrunchcrasher · 14/04/2025 14:19

OK this is clear that I was out of order but I genuinely did think the brunch would be a problem.

I wasn’t crying for sympathy. I cried because I was shocked.

My partner is on my side but won’t say anything.

Your partner won’t say anything because he knows you are wrong. He is just saying he’s on your side to avoid any more tears and batshittery

randomchap · 14/04/2025 14:21

I suspect your partner's not on your side. But he's keeping a diplomatic silence to try to minimise the fallout from this.

Smartiepants79 · 14/04/2025 14:21

And also, in the nicest possible way, your son is not related to the bride or the groom. He is not family. He is just the child of a family members current partner. I can understand why they might not have felt it was necessary that he be included.

Gloriia · 14/04/2025 14:22

Do you mean the day after the wedding you went to get breakfast at the wedding venue which wasn't an exclusive thing for wedding guests?

Even so, bit weird tbh.

Growlybear83 · 14/04/2025 14:22

Of course you were unreasonable and your behaviour was appalling, not only towards your sister in law but for making your child feel so awkward. You owe the bride and your son a huge apology.

murasaki · 14/04/2025 14:23

Gloriia · 14/04/2025 14:22

Do you mean the day after the wedding you went to get breakfast at the wedding venue which wasn't an exclusive thing for wedding guests?

Even so, bit weird tbh.

She tried to take the son into a private room where the wedding guests were having brunch.

There was a separate public area.

Exasperated24 · 14/04/2025 14:23

Weddingbrunchcrasher · 14/04/2025 14:15

Other children were invited, Godchildren and cousins were invited.

Was I unreasonable to think the brunch was ok? I didn’t see this as part of the wedding but post-wedding where it didn’t matter.

Was the brunch the day after?

So they had the wedding, you all stayed over at the hotel, you left to pick up your son and then brought son back to the hotel. The day after the wedding?

if so I don’t think that was totally unreasonable of you! They can’t dictate who has breakfast/brunch in a hotel.

nomas · 14/04/2025 14:23

If your son wasn’t invited to the wedding and evening do, why would you assume he was invited to the wedding breakfast?

At least own it that you thought you could crash it and no one would say anything.

And why would you even want to go to the wedding of someone who wants to exclude your son? I’m actually cringing for you. The only correct course of action would have been to either the decline the invitation on behalf of everyone, or for your DH to go on his own.

edwinbear · 14/04/2025 14:24

You really can't turn up to private events and expect them to happily cater for uninvited guests. Your son wasn't invited, you knew that, but for some bizarre reason you thought it was OK to shoe horn him in and feed him at their expense.

BoredZelda · 14/04/2025 14:24

Sevenandahalf · 14/04/2025 14:19

I'm reading it that the brunch was the day after the wedding.
I don't think I would have brought my child to it but I can understand why you did - it's shit you put him in the position where he cried but it's weird the bride cared enough about brunch the day after her wedding to make an 8 year old not attend.

Yes, I’d agree this seems like a very extreme reaction from the bride.

BernardButlersBra · 14/04/2025 14:24

Surely a reverse. No one is this tone deaf and absorbed? Are they?!

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 14/04/2025 14:24

if so I don’t think that was totally unreasonable of you! They can’t dictate who has breakfast/brunch in a hotel.

They can't prevent them having breakfast in the public area of the hotel but they could for the private brunch they arranged.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread