Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be horrified that Israel is slaughtering children at a rate not seen for ober

1000 replies

ThisNattyTurtle · 22/03/2025 07:53

Israel killed more children in 15 months than were killed in all the conflicts of the world in the last 4 years combined. Israel is killing children again now at an unprecedented rate and the UK is supporting it with weapons, money and intelligence.
Israel is committing genocide according to the UN, Amnesty and Human Rights Watch. Israel killed 159 Palestinians, including children, during the ceasefire - only 1 Israeli was killed in that time and that was a soldier in a friendly fire event.

Mumsnet HQ there are at least 3 threads about Ukraine still on AIBU, and many other political ones. Please do not hide this topic away in the other section again without at least explaining why UK involvement in the mass slaughter of children is not worthy of the front page. We are supporting a regime much worse than Russia, as much as Russia's regime is awful.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
41
SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 27/03/2025 23:26

sommerjade · 27/03/2025 20:01

Why don’t Hamas give shelter to the Gazan civilians in their deep tunnels??

If Hamas is in deep tunnels then why is Israel bombing aid kitchens and ambulances?

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 27/03/2025 23:29

Licky · 27/03/2025 20:55

What out of the blue? Or in response to thousands of rockets fired at Israeli civilians?

Gaza became self-governing in 2005. If only they'd focused on their own growth rather than Israeli death and destruction.

Gaza became self-governing in 2005.

No. They were put under a total air, sea and land blockade since 2005. They were not given any self-rule whatsoever.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 27/03/2025 23:32

HellsBalls · 27/03/2025 20:29

Gaza looked very well developed before the Oct 7th attacks. Almost as if they had no issue building.
Those alleged ‘refugee camps’ that were bombed at the beginning of the conflict looked as well developed as anywhere in the Middle East.
Certainly not tent cities as depicted.

The refugee camps were founded in 1947/8, and so yes they’re not living in tents because international aid meant infrastructure was built. They are still refugee camps.

The Israeli blockade including refusing building materials and permits are all well documented.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 27/03/2025 23:41

Martymcfly24 · 27/03/2025 21:54

@Licky Gaza was not self governing.
Israel controlled, electricity, imports and exports, taxes , federal wages, internet speed, water and building permits and movement of people.

They controlled the airspace (bombing the only airport in 2001 3 years after it opened) and territorial waters and 2 of the 3 border crossings.

Would you consider this self governing?

It’s 3 of 3 border crossings, the treaty with Egypt means both Egypt and Israel have to approve anything and anyone going through the Rafah border crossing.

ImpartialObserver · 28/03/2025 00:08

Martymcfly24 · 27/03/2025 21:54

@Licky Gaza was not self governing.
Israel controlled, electricity, imports and exports, taxes , federal wages, internet speed, water and building permits and movement of people.

They controlled the airspace (bombing the only airport in 2001 3 years after it opened) and territorial waters and 2 of the 3 border crossings.

Would you consider this self governing?

Please expand on why Israel bombed the airport after it was closed down during the second intifada.

Wasn’t it something to do with plans to bring in weapons and militants to use against Israel?

Wasn’t there an intercepted boat packed with fifty tonnes of weapons bound for Gaza which may have something to do with territorial waters having to be controlled afterwards?

Wasn’t there kidnappings, knife and shooting attacks and suicide bombings leading up to this?

Wasn’t there a terrorist organisation, with a clear mandate to destroy Israel and kill Jews, voted in to govern Gaza in 2006 after Israel left them to it in 2005?

Didn’t thousands of Gazans cross from their open air prison into Israel to work right up until Oct 7th, because their own government was more interested in making rockets to fire at Israel rather than creating an economy for them?

Surely the parents of the children today being killed in a war with Israel started by their terrorist government, who voted them in, might have realistically been expected to think ahead as to why that might cause problems with having peace with Israel and Israel needing to take heavy security measures to protect it’s citizens further down the line?

This disingenuous rewriting of the narrative for where we are today, as if the Palestinians were just peacefully going about their business creating their own State, while Israel has been constantly oppressing them and killing them just because they’re evil Jews, is sickening and doesn’t wash with anyone with critical thinking skills.

LilacPeer · 28/03/2025 01:17

ImpartialObserver · 28/03/2025 00:08

Please expand on why Israel bombed the airport after it was closed down during the second intifada.

Wasn’t it something to do with plans to bring in weapons and militants to use against Israel?

Wasn’t there an intercepted boat packed with fifty tonnes of weapons bound for Gaza which may have something to do with territorial waters having to be controlled afterwards?

Wasn’t there kidnappings, knife and shooting attacks and suicide bombings leading up to this?

Wasn’t there a terrorist organisation, with a clear mandate to destroy Israel and kill Jews, voted in to govern Gaza in 2006 after Israel left them to it in 2005?

Didn’t thousands of Gazans cross from their open air prison into Israel to work right up until Oct 7th, because their own government was more interested in making rockets to fire at Israel rather than creating an economy for them?

Surely the parents of the children today being killed in a war with Israel started by their terrorist government, who voted them in, might have realistically been expected to think ahead as to why that might cause problems with having peace with Israel and Israel needing to take heavy security measures to protect it’s citizens further down the line?

This disingenuous rewriting of the narrative for where we are today, as if the Palestinians were just peacefully going about their business creating their own State, while Israel has been constantly oppressing them and killing them just because they’re evil Jews, is sickening and doesn’t wash with anyone with critical thinking skills.

As has already been stated, approximately 7% of Gazans today would have voted for Hamas. Most of the people giving birth to the children being blown up wouldn’t have been able to vote. So no, I don’t think they will
feel respinsible for voting them in.

And as has already been stated, nobody (except the pro Israel people on this thread) has referred to Jews as being the problem.

you can’t shoehorn antisemitism into this argument. I don’t infer that Jews are evil from the Israeli governments actions, the same as I don’t infer Muslims are evil from Hamas’ actions.

cindyhove · 28/03/2025 07:34

Letmecallyouback · 27/03/2025 08:59

Wait, what?? You're having a disagreement with someone about documented fact? Ooooookay... 😳

Problem is you are not talking about documented fact. Only about 1 side of so called documented fact. Not the same as truth

cindyhove · 28/03/2025 07:35

WhatMummyMakesSheEats · 27/03/2025 09:26

this post continues to blow my mind. I’ve stopped replying directly because people are so far into their own denial of their morality.

The number of people who are saying ‘I don’t condone killing innocent people including children but….’ LISTEN TO YOURSELF. There should be no BUT. The media has succeeded in their ‘othering’ of Palestinians because they don’t look like you. Try and think of how you’d feel if someone bombed your kids school, starved them and stopped them getting to hospital (or the hospital had been flattened) because a terrorist MIGHT be there.

Really genuinely think about it, if Israel’s intelligence and military is as good as it is, why do they have to bomb these buildings? Even if they DID have to bomb the buildings how have they not managed to kill them yet? I’ll tell you, they don’t want to! Why are they preventing aid and food to civilians?

why did Israel not progress to the next stage of the ceasefire if their main goal was to retrieve hostages?

people repeatedly stating what’s happened on October 7th (awful, disgusting) which was almost A YEAR AND A HALF OF BOMBING / STARVATION / WAR CRIMES ago do you really believe this is Israel ‘defending themselves’?

Yes

ThisNattyTurtle · 28/03/2025 07:42

More than half of Israelis adults DID vote in Ariel Sharon after he was found to be a war criminal by a UN investigation into his role in the Sabra and Shatila massacres. That was before Hamas and when the PA had renounced armed resistance. Sharon then deliberately stirred up the Intifada. So by your logic all the Israeli adults who voted him in are fair game and the children beside them are unfortunate collateral? That's disgraceful both ways it's applied. Shame.

OP posts:
Letmecallyouback · 28/03/2025 07:42

cindyhove · 28/03/2025 07:34

Problem is you are not talking about documented fact. Only about 1 side of so called documented fact. Not the same as truth

I’m not sure this thread is really your thing is it?

EasterIssland · 28/03/2025 07:45

cindyhove · 28/03/2025 07:34

Problem is you are not talking about documented fact. Only about 1 side of so called documented fact. Not the same as truth

Do you have links from international organisations that support your fact ?

Grammarnut · 28/03/2025 08:55

myearthisflat · 27/03/2025 17:51

By state actors I mean some official affiliation with a state. Gaza is not a state. Palestine is a state, but not a member of the UN because one of the permanent members of the UN security council refuses to recognise it. I'll let you guess which one.
Hamas is not a goverment of Palestine. They won the elections in 2006, but their neighbours and the military behind their neighbours refused to recognise the elections. So no, Hamas is not a state actor.
When someone says 'a terrorist' it is not immediately clear what they mean by it. It can be a judgment of the actions. Or, it can be recognition by their authority. Sometimes it's just an insult.
Let me try to demostrate by example.
Imagine you buy a roaming hoover (like Roomba) and let it clean your home. You recommend it to your friends and neighbours, it works well. All happy. Then night they all creep to your beds and explode. (Sorry, I know it's awful). You all bought it in the EU. A free-Tibet militant group says it's behind the operation. Would you call it a terrorist act? I would . I guess you would too. All our European governments would open investigation about explosives roaming our street, they would denounce the act, nominate free-Tibetans a terrorist organisation and try to cut ties to anyone associated.
You know what I'm referring to. There was silence in response, because the act was by 'a friendly state'.
And another aspect of it - when an ISIS member becomes the head of the government, pretty soon our governments say 'oh, he changed' and remove the 'terrorist' label. Because 'governments cannot be terrorists' by definition.

Hamas is de facto the state in Gaza - there is no other authority, so either they run it we are looking at arnarchy.* Why ask me to guess who blocked Palestine becoming a full member of the UN - it's the US, a verifiable fact?
The phones rigged to explode in the hand were investigated thoroughly. It was Israel, using a dummy company within the EU (so a safe place to buy from) to sell phones to Hamas who were using them to plot terrorism. I am not happy that they exploded in the hands of children or of innocent Gazans who also bought them and Israel is culpable for that. But, unlike your robot hoovers, the purchasers of (most of) the phones were not innocently buying them - they were bought to plot terrorist acts and the friends recommending them to each other were (mostly) terrorists. The entire wicked plot by Israel backfired on them since Hamas and their allies took to using letters sent in the post to plot terrorism, since a) phones could be tapped and b) they might explode. This is one reason the long planned events on Oct 7th got under Israel's radar which means the Israeli government bears some culpability for the success of the attacks.
I suspect one reason more fuss was not made about the phone incident is that many security services across the world use such underhand methods to get at non-state agents who are terrorists, and did not wish this to become common knowledge rather than a guess.
*anarchy is lack of a central authority (literally, lack of an archon/ruler), it does not mean that no-one obeys any laws that exist, only that the choice to do so or not is up to individuals and laws are individually enforced.
NB You might as well have told the actual phone story btw.

Sportswatchernotplayer · 28/03/2025 09:16

It's seems its OK to criticise Israel on MN but popping up an article on aibu by another poster stating Amnesty International realises it didn't condemn Hamas enough is swiftly deleted! Interesting.

Brave Gazans are speaking out and also want Hamas gone seems to gain little traction!

Sportswatchernotplayer · 28/03/2025 09:17

I screenshot a bit of the report we cannot see.

"Members of Amnesty International hinted that condemning Hamas too much may bolster the Israeli narrative."

RandomWordsThrownTogether · 28/03/2025 09:17

Grammarnut · 28/03/2025 08:55

Hamas is de facto the state in Gaza - there is no other authority, so either they run it we are looking at arnarchy.* Why ask me to guess who blocked Palestine becoming a full member of the UN - it's the US, a verifiable fact?
The phones rigged to explode in the hand were investigated thoroughly. It was Israel, using a dummy company within the EU (so a safe place to buy from) to sell phones to Hamas who were using them to plot terrorism. I am not happy that they exploded in the hands of children or of innocent Gazans who also bought them and Israel is culpable for that. But, unlike your robot hoovers, the purchasers of (most of) the phones were not innocently buying them - they were bought to plot terrorist acts and the friends recommending them to each other were (mostly) terrorists. The entire wicked plot by Israel backfired on them since Hamas and their allies took to using letters sent in the post to plot terrorism, since a) phones could be tapped and b) they might explode. This is one reason the long planned events on Oct 7th got under Israel's radar which means the Israeli government bears some culpability for the success of the attacks.
I suspect one reason more fuss was not made about the phone incident is that many security services across the world use such underhand methods to get at non-state agents who are terrorists, and did not wish this to become common knowledge rather than a guess.
*anarchy is lack of a central authority (literally, lack of an archon/ruler), it does not mean that no-one obeys any laws that exist, only that the choice to do so or not is up to individuals and laws are individually enforced.
NB You might as well have told the actual phone story btw.

Edited

Where you don’t know something you just seem to make it up - the pager attack by Israel happened in 2024 so had no bearing on how October 7th 2023 was organised. It also targeted Hezbollah rather than Hamas.

myearthisflat · 28/03/2025 10:05

Grammarnut · 28/03/2025 08:55

Hamas is de facto the state in Gaza - there is no other authority, so either they run it we are looking at arnarchy.* Why ask me to guess who blocked Palestine becoming a full member of the UN - it's the US, a verifiable fact?
The phones rigged to explode in the hand were investigated thoroughly. It was Israel, using a dummy company within the EU (so a safe place to buy from) to sell phones to Hamas who were using them to plot terrorism. I am not happy that they exploded in the hands of children or of innocent Gazans who also bought them and Israel is culpable for that. But, unlike your robot hoovers, the purchasers of (most of) the phones were not innocently buying them - they were bought to plot terrorist acts and the friends recommending them to each other were (mostly) terrorists. The entire wicked plot by Israel backfired on them since Hamas and their allies took to using letters sent in the post to plot terrorism, since a) phones could be tapped and b) they might explode. This is one reason the long planned events on Oct 7th got under Israel's radar which means the Israeli government bears some culpability for the success of the attacks.
I suspect one reason more fuss was not made about the phone incident is that many security services across the world use such underhand methods to get at non-state agents who are terrorists, and did not wish this to become common knowledge rather than a guess.
*anarchy is lack of a central authority (literally, lack of an archon/ruler), it does not mean that no-one obeys any laws that exist, only that the choice to do so or not is up to individuals and laws are individually enforced.
NB You might as well have told the actual phone story btw.

Edited

Gaza is not a state, not a country. Hamas is govering it, but they are not a country, not a UN member. Palestine is not a UN member because of the US.
My badly made points were:
(1) it was a terrorist act by nature
(2) it was not legally or officially called a terrorist act because it was done by Israeli security services.
The difference between militants, terrorists and freedom fighters are well known. So the emotional labels 'but they are terrorists' are not informative arguments.

myearthisflat · 28/03/2025 10:13

Sportswatchernotplayer · 28/03/2025 09:16

It's seems its OK to criticise Israel on MN but popping up an article on aibu by another poster stating Amnesty International realises it didn't condemn Hamas enough is swiftly deleted! Interesting.

Brave Gazans are speaking out and also want Hamas gone seems to gain little traction!

Do they say how many Gazans have been killed by Hamas bombs, drones and snipers in the past 18 months?

cindyhove · 28/03/2025 10:19

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

cindyhove · 28/03/2025 10:21

EasterIssland · 28/03/2025 07:45

Do you have links from international organisations that support your fact ?

I have absolutely no faith in “international organisations” who continue to spout lies and anti israel/Semitic rhetoric

cindyhove · 28/03/2025 10:24

Sportswatchernotplayer · 28/03/2025 09:16

It's seems its OK to criticise Israel on MN but popping up an article on aibu by another poster stating Amnesty International realises it didn't condemn Hamas enough is swiftly deleted! Interesting.

Brave Gazans are speaking out and also want Hamas gone seems to gain little traction!

Agree

cindyhove · 28/03/2025 10:24

myearthisflat · 28/03/2025 10:13

Do they say how many Gazans have been killed by Hamas bombs, drones and snipers in the past 18 months?

Of course not. Those deaths don’t count as israel didn’t cause them

myearthisflat · 28/03/2025 10:26

cindyhove · 28/03/2025 10:24

Of course not. Those deaths don’t count as israel didn’t cause them

I see. It must be hamas. They seem to have taken over IDF and israeli government.

Letmecallyouback · 28/03/2025 10:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I can understand that. It must be awkward not being able to substantiate anything you say while still trying to appear that you actually know what you're talking about.

cindyhove · 28/03/2025 11:31

myearthisflat · 28/03/2025 10:26

I see. It must be hamas. They seem to have taken over IDF and israeli government.

Of course it is hammas. Who sends up the rockets in the Gaza Strip if not them?

ImpartialObserver · 28/03/2025 11:53

LilacPeer · 28/03/2025 01:17

As has already been stated, approximately 7% of Gazans today would have voted for Hamas. Most of the people giving birth to the children being blown up wouldn’t have been able to vote. So no, I don’t think they will
feel respinsible for voting them in.

And as has already been stated, nobody (except the pro Israel people on this thread) has referred to Jews as being the problem.

you can’t shoehorn antisemitism into this argument. I don’t infer that Jews are evil from the Israeli governments actions, the same as I don’t infer Muslims are evil from Hamas’ actions.

Your reading comprehension skills are obviously lacking as I was referring to the Gazans who voted Hamas in, in 2006. A lot of those people would be the parents and grandparents of the children killed and put in harms way today.

The argument that most Palestinians TODAY did not vote Hamas in is rather tiresome and seems to want to perpetuate the fallacy that no one in Gaza voted for them or supported them and they just somehow took over, when the truth is the majority of Gazans in their 30’s and over today did vote for them knowing full well what their charter was.

They need to take responsibility for that.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.