Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel outraged that Kyle Clifford is able to refuse to attend court today?

329 replies

HappySonHappyMum · 11/03/2025 13:01

I am absolutely outraged that Kyle Clifford can choose not to attend court to hear his sentence and be forced to listen to the impact statements being read out by John and Amy Hunt. I'm literally sitting here crying with rage and sadness right now listening to their words. He should be dragged there and forced to listen, he lost all rights when he committed rape and then murdered three women in cold blood. Why does he even have a choice?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Beetlebumz · 11/03/2025 14:14

Not sure who on earth voted that yabu. How strange. Of course he should have been forced.

JandLandG · 11/03/2025 14:14

waterrat · 11/03/2025 13:07

As the judge pointed out - nobody benefits from a disruptive unwilling defendant being dragged into court. He said it would be undignified and would impact negatively on the family.

Hmmm...doesn't matter, just put him tied up in a cage with a gag in his mouth and let him lie there while it happens.

Not just him, but this has become a thing recently...drag them in by the hair if necessary.

I'm very left wing and somewhat liberal, but why does society go soft on people who need to be forced/shown a lesson/whatever the appropriate course of anon is?

Whether it's tax dodging/violence/criminality of whatever kind, the state should be standing up for the vast, vast majority of society by not tolerating any of this piss-taking by these people.

KrisAkabusi · 11/03/2025 14:15

MrsSkylerWhite · 11/03/2025 13:19

BreatheAndFocus

He could refuse to be put into his wheelchair. The judge said it wouldn’t be right to use restraints on someone in a wheelchair, which implies it was hoped they could put him in his wheelchair against his will and strap him in so he couldn’t try to throw himself out.
Yes, he should be in Court, but he’s clearly a snivelling coward. I doubt he’d shout, unlike AR, but even if the guilty person did, they could be placed in a soundproofed Perspex box to hear the statements and verdict so that any shouts wouldn’t interrupt the proceedings

He could. Not much he could do about it if two prison officers picked him up and put him in it. I think the judge is wrong.
Personally, I wouldn’t be averse to a gag, either.

Human rights? Sorry, you gave those up when you adopted inhuman behaviour.

NO. That's the point. They are rights that apply to everyone. You can't start picking and choosing which rights apply. That's the start of a slippery slope.

BeHere · 11/03/2025 14:15

MrsSkylerWhite · 11/03/2025 14:08

BeHere
Does the person you know do any work restraining violent prisoners, or using Tasers on them in confined spaces when they don't want to do something?

I dont know, tbh. They don’t go into detail. As a prison officer, I can only assume they use physical restraint. No idea about tasers.

I was suggesting that they could be introduced. Not that they are currently used when transporting prisons because I don’t know.

Prison officers do use physical restraints, but the problem is that someone has to get the restraints on first. That's the risky part. Any time that has to be done, it's exposing the people who have to do it to harm.

It's possible to use tasers in confined spaces. Some police forces have guidance on this. We don't routinely do it in prisons, there was a trial last year. In prisons not transport. But again, it's a potential danger to the people in the immediate vicinity.

There's just not a way to do this without exposing the people around the prisoners, who remember will often be very dangerous people, to avoidable physical harm. In a sector where staff already get attacked regularly, and vote with their feet. As someone with a relative who does this job, the lack of consideration for those expected to do the dirty work is dispiriting.

DuesToTheDirt · 11/03/2025 14:16

Nottodaythankyou123 · 11/03/2025 14:13

whole life order!

Yes and thank fuck for that.

KrisAkabusi · 11/03/2025 14:17

MrsSkylerWhite · 11/03/2025 13:30

HeddaGarbled

He’ll get his punishment. We don’t need a show

It’s not about “we”. Personally, I don’t think these trials should be filmed for public consumption.

It’s about what the family needs. Their wishes ought to override everything.

Also no. That's why we don't allow the family decide the sentence and why we have judges and sentencing guidelines.

CassiasC · 11/03/2025 14:20

grumpygrape · 11/03/2025 14:05

No, too far. This thread has degenerated unfortunately, treating people like that is wrong

Yes. It’s unfortunate that prisoners cannot be compelled to face sentencing remarks and victim statements, but our legal system lowering itself to doling out medieval treatment is not a price I’d be willing to pay. That is not because I think criminals of this type deserve kindness, but because stooping to this sort of thing degrades us all. Including victims.

Nottodaythankyou123 · 11/03/2025 14:21

DuesToTheDirt · 11/03/2025 14:16

Yes and thank fuck for that.

Absolutely, well deserved

Nottodaythankyou123 · 11/03/2025 14:22

JandLandG · 11/03/2025 14:14

Hmmm...doesn't matter, just put him tied up in a cage with a gag in his mouth and let him lie there while it happens.

Not just him, but this has become a thing recently...drag them in by the hair if necessary.

I'm very left wing and somewhat liberal, but why does society go soft on people who need to be forced/shown a lesson/whatever the appropriate course of anon is?

Whether it's tax dodging/violence/criminality of whatever kind, the state should be standing up for the vast, vast majority of society by not tolerating any of this piss-taking by these people.

I’m sure in light of what happened to Louise, seeing someone bound and gagged against their will wouldn’t be at all traumatic for her family

Mrsbloggz · 11/03/2025 14:23

He would have to appear bound and gagged in order for him to be prevented from disrupting proceedings, this would open the door for the Andrew Tate brigade to treat him as a martyr.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 11/03/2025 14:23

Fedupmumofadultsons · 11/03/2025 13:12

Ideally they should have wheeled him into a room and done it bye Skype teams ir whatever and be forced to listen to it with laptop and TV high enough he couldn't reach .he may have chosen not to watch but he couldn't shut of his hearing .not ideal but best if he wouldn't go to court

That's an excellent idea and one I'd be fully in favour of.

Reading the transcript from the hearing was harrowing but I applaud John and Amy Hunt for their strength and dignity. The way they talked about Carol, Hannah and Louise as people and refuse to allow them to just be known as victims or this monster was incredible and I'm not sure I could have done the same in their shoes.

This quote from John Hunt really stood out to me, "The impact of what you have done will be taken to my grave, but on the way there I want you to know I stand strong before you today. As you, Kyle, are confined to a fate worse than death".

Ilovetowander · 11/03/2025 14:26

I think the potential disruption and the distress this may cause the victims family means it's better he isn't there

givemushypeasachance · 11/03/2025 14:27

This is rehashed every time a case like this comes up. What is the point of making him come to court and be disruptive, when the important thing is the victim impact statements and sentencing remarks are publicly heard. He's not going to feel bad about it and change his ways. He's not getting out anyway.

Physically restrain the prisoner and drag them in, fighting and screaming and spitting? Gag them so they can't spit or shout? Hold their eyes open? Force the family sitting across the room to put up with it as they piss and shit themselves to make a scene? What are you achieving by it all. He's being locked up for the rest of his life and everyone knows he was too much of a coward to listen to the judgements. That'll do.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 11/03/2025 14:30

I would like the victims to be considered first and foremost, so if the victims family want them in court, they should be compelled to attend.

Apparently the judge didn’t want to see a wheelchair bound man shackled. Hell I’d like to have seen him bound and gagged with duct tape, just how he treated one of the women he murdered.

ImWearingPantaloons · 11/03/2025 14:30

I was outraged as well. They should have got 6 of their strongest, cuffed him then manhandled him into a police van.

When you kill 3 people having tortured then for four hours all human rights can be waived as far as I'm concerned

Kibble29 · 11/03/2025 14:31

Whole life order for this piece of dirt is the right outcome.

I can’t subscribe to this idea that wishing pain or mistreatment on him (and people like him) somehow makes us as bad as him.

He murdered people in cold blood and left a couple of their immediate family to live with it.

Those were normal, innocent, law abiding people going about their normal lives, bothering nobody, until he snuffed it all out in a brutal, violent manner.

If someone were to cut this guy’s throat tonight in prison, or to pour boiling water on him (or whatever form of violence they choose), they’d be doing it to someone who committed an appalling crime.

It’s not the same thing as targeting an innocent family.

Yes, we’re not the judge, jury and executioner and we don’t get to choose who has a right to live, but on a human level, I bet most people would rather he suffered.

There’s nothing wrong with that IMO.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 11/03/2025 14:33

Kibble29 · 11/03/2025 14:31

Whole life order for this piece of dirt is the right outcome.

I can’t subscribe to this idea that wishing pain or mistreatment on him (and people like him) somehow makes us as bad as him.

He murdered people in cold blood and left a couple of their immediate family to live with it.

Those were normal, innocent, law abiding people going about their normal lives, bothering nobody, until he snuffed it all out in a brutal, violent manner.

If someone were to cut this guy’s throat tonight in prison, or to pour boiling water on him (or whatever form of violence they choose), they’d be doing it to someone who committed an appalling crime.

It’s not the same thing as targeting an innocent family.

Yes, we’re not the judge, jury and executioner and we don’t get to choose who has a right to live, but on a human level, I bet most people would rather he suffered.

There’s nothing wrong with that IMO.

He will absolutely get targeted in prison. I expect him to have to be put somewhere with the pedophiles.

NotVeryFunny · 11/03/2025 14:33

waterrat · 11/03/2025 13:07

As the judge pointed out - nobody benefits from a disruptive unwilling defendant being dragged into court. He said it would be undignified and would impact negatively on the family.

This. And also why is he going to care about the impact statements? He won't give a shit so tbh I think him being there would be worse. I'd rather he wasn't there if I was a victim of him. I wouldn't want to tell them exactly how much they had harmed me and give him that satisfaction. You are assuming he'll feel like you do but I think that's very unlikely.

fashionqueen0123 · 11/03/2025 14:33

murasaki · 11/03/2025 13:02

I thought this was being changed?

Same. Why hasn’t it happened! In the US they give extra punishments if they refuse to come to sentencing

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 11/03/2025 14:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 11/03/2025 14:35

fashionqueen0123 · 11/03/2025 14:33

Same. Why hasn’t it happened! In the US they give extra punishments if they refuse to come to sentencing

I didn’t know that. Excellent idea.

CaveMum · 11/03/2025 14:35

The victim impact statements were incredibly powerful and how any of them were able to stand and read out the words I do not know.

John Hunt's closing words were particularly powerful:

”Kyle, just remember one thing: whatever sentence you are about to receive, whatever misery lies ahead for you, remember on your dying day there will be no release for you Kyle.

The screams of Hell, Kyle, I can hear them now. They’re going to roll out the red carpet for you.

You will realise your miserable fate will last for eternity.”

Kibble29 · 11/03/2025 14:35

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 11/03/2025 14:33

He will absolutely get targeted in prison. I expect him to have to be put somewhere with the pedophiles.

He will. I expect he’ll go to solitary until the media dies down and he’s safe to rear his ugly head. Then in full protection with the beasts.

Some protection wings also house guys who have committed non-sexual offences but have enemies in the rest of the prison or drug debts etc. Hopefully one of those guys is offered their debt forgiven if they do something to Clifford.

Kibble29 · 11/03/2025 14:36

CaveMum · 11/03/2025 14:35

The victim impact statements were incredibly powerful and how any of them were able to stand and read out the words I do not know.

John Hunt's closing words were particularly powerful:

”Kyle, just remember one thing: whatever sentence you are about to receive, whatever misery lies ahead for you, remember on your dying day there will be no release for you Kyle.

The screams of Hell, Kyle, I can hear them now. They’re going to roll out the red carpet for you.

You will realise your miserable fate will last for eternity.”

Wow! That’s very powerful. You can really feel it.

itsgettingweird · 11/03/2025 14:37

northernballer · 11/03/2025 13:51

I don't think he should be forced to to attend but I do think there must be a way to punish offenders who choose not to. An extra 10 years on a sentence, or for those with a life sentence removal of privileges or something. Someone with more knowledge than me could surely come up with something better.

I'll choose to remember the incredible dignity and message that the Hunt family gave today though, not him.

That's the kind of thing the current government are pursuing after Sunak started the ball rolling at the end of his term.

If you do t go to sentencing then time can be added etc.

Swipe left for the next trending thread