Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To be disgusted at the talks between Russia and the US

1000 replies

SunnyDayInFeb · 17/02/2025 08:58

So Russia and the US are meeting in Saudia Arabia to carve up Ukraine.

And Ukraine, whose people have been fighting and dying since their country was invaded, haven't even been invited to the table.

It's like we are back in the 19th century with the European colonial powers drawing lines on a map to divide Africa between them.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
sleepwouldbenice · 17/02/2025 14:51

AlternativeView · 17/02/2025 14:32

I don't doubt at all that zelensky will be part of the negotiations, he's spoken to trump many times.
He's understandably extremely angry and emotional and putin is a cold hard calculating bastard.
I don't think that's a good recipe for success. The USA knows what zelensky wants and will obviously not give into Russia.
Putin will be loving zelensky exclusion but that doesn't mean Ukraine will miss out.
They will lay the ground work and see how serious Russia is wanting peace.
Putin has felt that they are at war with the USA anyway.

Obviously not give into Russia? They already have

JoyousGreyOrca · 17/02/2025 14:53

@LifeExperience Ukraine are not asking the US to rebuild their country.

EasternStandard · 17/02/2025 15:03

Well, people's DCs who have chosen to join the military.

We aren't talking conscription.

So you and others are posting support, what is stopping the peacekeeping from becoming combat and then what?

It's an easy sell that's for sure to get troops involved this way

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 17/02/2025 15:06

bemoresloth · 17/02/2025 14:04

It's got a whiff of Putin appeasement to pretend people are missing it

Yup!

AlternativeView · 17/02/2025 15:13

@sleepwouldbenice forgive me but I thought putin wanted the entirety of Ukraine

EasternStandard · 17/02/2025 15:15

It looks like the gung ho posters might not get to see troops sent anyway reading up on other leaders' responses

PermanentTemporary · 17/02/2025 15:23

'Britain was on its own for 1 year'.

No it absolutely fucking wasn't. Back then Britain had an enormous empire and made sure all its dominions and colonies lined up with them to provide personnel and materiel with a range of coercion, deals and diplomacy. It was an entirely different world. It's true that what showed the naked truth of the changeover in power was that the UK was indeed paying the US back for decades, because even then we couldn't afford the war we were eventually involved with.

sleepwouldbenice · 17/02/2025 15:50

AlternativeView · 17/02/2025 15:13

@sleepwouldbenice forgive me but I thought putin wanted the entirety of Ukraine

He still wants that and more. He will keep going after a pause, just like after 2014

EasternEcho · 17/02/2025 15:57

LifeExperience · 17/02/2025 14:36

Rich, powerful country is going to spend billions rebuilding Ukraine, so rare earth minerals are the least they can do to pay us back. They have nothing else to compensate us with, and the American people are in absolutely no mood to put out any more $ without compensation. Our wallet is closed.

Why do you think Trump won when he's an orange buffoon? Because he taps into the zeitgeist of current-day America. We're over paying for everybody's everything, and Trump is our weapon to accomplish that.

I find this difficult to understand when in reality, the times article 5 of NATO has been invoked it has been at the behest of the US: Other NATO nations have had their soldiers dying in wars started by the US, never the other way around since NATO came into being. But propoganda is everything.

AlternativeView · 17/02/2025 16:01

@sleepwouldbenice right so he's not going to be given Ukraine. There is no appeaseing, the war hopefully will stop and America said it doesn't want a temporary peace it wants solid long standing peace

Havanananana · 17/02/2025 16:06

LifeExperience · 17/02/2025 13:51

No force--just a deal. Greenlanders would get all the benefits of US citizenship with no taxes. Same deal Puerto Rico, Guam, Samoa and a few other US territories get.

Trump is building an iron dome defense system over the US and, because of geography he needs either Greenland or certain parts of Canada to do it.

Puerto Rico and Guam were taken by force from Spain in 1898.
The population of America Samoa has no political representation and the islands became an American possession in 1899.
Hawaii was annexed by the US in 1898 - In 1893 the Queen was illegally deposed by American businessmen (who included members of Dole family) with help from the US Marines.

None of these were "deals" in the sense that none of the resident populations had any say in how they became American possessions. Not all of the deals are the same - Hawaii is now a US State, but Puerto Ricans and Samoans have far fewer rights than US citizens have.

And what if Greenlanders want to remain Danish (which many don't) or become independent of any colonial powers? Why does Trump think that 2025 is the same as 1898 and that he will just be allowed to annex, buy or invade any country that he feels like taking over? What does he think the world's response will be if he does decide to invade any country - or does he believe that if he allows Putin to freely invade anywhere east of the River Oder, he'll be allowed to threaten anywhere west of there?

twinklystar23 · 17/02/2025 16:06

PermanentTemporary · 17/02/2025 15:23

'Britain was on its own for 1 year'.

No it absolutely fucking wasn't. Back then Britain had an enormous empire and made sure all its dominions and colonies lined up with them to provide personnel and materiel with a range of coercion, deals and diplomacy. It was an entirely different world. It's true that what showed the naked truth of the changeover in power was that the UK was indeed paying the US back for decades, because even then we couldn't afford the war we were eventually involved with.

Blimey that invokes a somewhat aggressive reaponse?

The point was that the US didnt become fully involved until the 11th hour whereby we had used all our resources (and future £££) and yes to your point resources of those colonies that were part of the then empire. Yes it seems we couldnt afford the war, yet making a stand against the nazis was that something we should have decided against if we coudnt afford it, much like ukraine, ironically.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 17/02/2025 16:07

Why is he posing wanting to be involved in discussions about the future of his own country?

That's not what I posted, @SunnyDayInFeb; what I actually wrote was that "despite the posing - (Zelensky's) simply not one of the big players who Putin's likely to listen to", and as said several times he'll obviously have to be involved in any ongoing negotiations if anything worthwhile comes of the Trump/Putin talks

Puzzledandpissedoff · 17/02/2025 16:13

LifeExperience · 17/02/2025 14:36

Rich, powerful country is going to spend billions rebuilding Ukraine, so rare earth minerals are the least they can do to pay us back. They have nothing else to compensate us with, and the American people are in absolutely no mood to put out any more $ without compensation. Our wallet is closed.

Why do you think Trump won when he's an orange buffoon? Because he taps into the zeitgeist of current-day America. We're over paying for everybody's everything, and Trump is our weapon to accomplish that.

An interesting post, LifeExperience. I'm well aware of how many Americans feel about this issue, but it's unusual - at least on here - to see it so starkly put

FWIW I agree completely about the constant paying-out the US is asked to do, but it was amusing at best to see someone insist that Ukraine won't also expect them to pay for its rebuilding

As if Hmm

Typo

wholettheturnipsburn · 17/02/2025 16:14

@Motomum23 You've seen videos? Do you have a source for that?

Unless you mean the Trade Union House in Odesa and you haven't understood what was happening.

By the way Odesa is in Ukraine. People speaking Russian doesn't mean they are russian

PermanentTemporary · 17/02/2025 16:15

It's an aggressive response because I can't stand people using this 'Britain stood alone' nonsense. I know we've kind of buried our history of expansionist colonialism but we owe it to the people we exploited at the very least to acknowledge they existed.

wholettheturnipsburn · 17/02/2025 16:15

Puzzledandpissedoff · 17/02/2025 16:07

Why is he posing wanting to be involved in discussions about the future of his own country?

That's not what I posted, @SunnyDayInFeb; what I actually wrote was that "despite the posing - (Zelensky's) simply not one of the big players who Putin's likely to listen to", and as said several times he'll obviously have to be involved in any ongoing negotiations if anything worthwhile comes of the Trump/Putin talks

What DID you mean by "posing"?

Locutus2000 · 17/02/2025 16:17

EasternStandard · 17/02/2025 15:03

Well, people's DCs who have chosen to join the military.

We aren't talking conscription.

So you and others are posting support, what is stopping the peacekeeping from becoming combat and then what?

It's an easy sell that's for sure to get troops involved this way

Please stop putting words into other people's mouths.

AzurePanda · 17/02/2025 16:19

The US has spent something like $120bn on Ukraine and the EU something like $55bn. Europe has been persistently warned to up their defence budgets and has done relatively little about it.

Russia is no longer a threat to the US so I can understand why most Americans want the war to end,

OrangePeel2 · 17/02/2025 16:24

AzurePanda · 17/02/2025 16:19

The US has spent something like $120bn on Ukraine and the EU something like $55bn. Europe has been persistently warned to up their defence budgets and has done relatively little about it.

Russia is no longer a threat to the US so I can understand why most Americans want the war to end,

Great news. Time to decommission nuclear weapons then!

wholettheturnipsburn · 17/02/2025 16:24

SunnyDayInFeb · 17/02/2025 14:33

It would be completely different if the US had sat down with Ukraine and thrashed out a plan and gone off to use their diplomatic muscle and super power status to negotiate with Putin on their behalf.

That is not what is happening.

People seem almost gleeful that Ukraine is getting what it deserves. Their only crime seems to be that they are not the biggest, nastiest bully in the room.

I can understand an argument from pragmatism, though I might not agree. But why the desire to demonise the Ukrainians? Is it because people have to justify their betrayal by pretending they have done something to deserve it?

It's completely gobsmacking to read some of the posts

Victim blaming. It's disgusting

bemoresloth · 17/02/2025 16:28

EasternStandard · 17/02/2025 15:03

Well, people's DCs who have chosen to join the military.

We aren't talking conscription.

So you and others are posting support, what is stopping the peacekeeping from becoming combat and then what?

It's an easy sell that's for sure to get troops involved this way

Can you confirm whether or not you are talking about conscription?

AzurePanda · 17/02/2025 16:30

@OrangePeel2 there are still other Nuclear powers who are a threat to the USA and who, unlike Russia, are not on the road to bankruptcy.

In any case, Trump has said he would like to sit down with Xi and Putin and achieve an agreement to cut their military spending in half. Wouldn’t that be something amazing.

Milkmani8 · 17/02/2025 16:39

Nothatgingerpirate · 17/02/2025 11:07

You seem to be pretty wound up, OP, while knowing a lot about "Russia taking over Eastern Europe for forty years".
From a person born in Communist Czechoslovakia, I don't care where these meetings are held. I'm fed up of the "war" in Ukraine, Mr.Zelensky's demands and the lasting impact on Prague especially, as far as increase in population goes.
Sooner this ends, sooner these people can go back home and start rebuilding their country, with the help of the West.

I’m sorry hear you are fed up with the war in Ukraine. But as someone who is 1/2 Latvian 1/2 Ukrainian and lived in Ukraine under USSR for the first 12 years of my life I can’t help but disagree. I don’t want my country being carved up for Putin because a load of ethnic Russians live there. What’s next - we give Putin Daugavapils in Latvia just so his little ethnics can feel as one again with mother Russia. If they don’t like the countries they live in they need to go back to the motherland- but there is a reason they stay….

sleepwouldbenice · 17/02/2025 16:41

AlternativeView · 17/02/2025 16:01

@sleepwouldbenice right so he's not going to be given Ukraine. There is no appeaseing, the war hopefully will stop and America said it doesn't want a temporary peace it wants solid long standing peace

Just given the parts he's taken through violent invasion?
And there won't be long standing peace, putin will pause then carry on

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread