Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask why women would be uncomfortable with unisex bathrooms

388 replies

Chumssss · 28/12/2024 21:58

Discussion with my DH tonight about this. Am I right in thinking that unisex bathrooms are not great?

OP posts:
ohyesido · 01/01/2025 18:02

I don't want to listen to members of the opposite sex doing their ablutions and I don't want them overhearing mine

hihelenhi · 01/01/2025 20:47

leftorrightnow · 01/01/2025 17:33

It’s so weird. It’s as if people think this if we behave as IF male violence and misogyny doesn’t exist, it’ll just cease to exist. Let’s get rid of patriarchy and misogyny, and then start having same sex bathrooms as the norm. Having same sex bathrooms won’t help gender equality.

Edited

Did you mean "mixed sex" bathrooms?

You make a really good point though about this almost magical thinking. That if we deny it, it means the (statistically demonstrated) problem of misogyny and male violence against women will magically go away, as if it's caused by us merely thinking about it and will disappear if we don't. It seems to be quite a fashionable view at the moment.

It's incredibly uncomfortable for a lot of women, myself included, to realise that there are a lot of men who really do hate us and that we too could become a victim of violent misogyny, just by virtue of being female and, for instance, in the wrong place and at the wrong time. I do think it's how uncomfortable the reality and realisation is that's part of the reason for the denial (and victim-blaming, the kind of "Well, I'm not as pathetic as SHE was to go and let herself get raped/beaten up by her husband, I'm one of the strong women, we're not some pathetic Victorian era couch-fainting victims " type of thing.) It's tricky.

leftorrightnow · 01/01/2025 21:03

hihelenhi · 01/01/2025 20:47

Did you mean "mixed sex" bathrooms?

You make a really good point though about this almost magical thinking. That if we deny it, it means the (statistically demonstrated) problem of misogyny and male violence against women will magically go away, as if it's caused by us merely thinking about it and will disappear if we don't. It seems to be quite a fashionable view at the moment.

It's incredibly uncomfortable for a lot of women, myself included, to realise that there are a lot of men who really do hate us and that we too could become a victim of violent misogyny, just by virtue of being female and, for instance, in the wrong place and at the wrong time. I do think it's how uncomfortable the reality and realisation is that's part of the reason for the denial (and victim-blaming, the kind of "Well, I'm not as pathetic as SHE was to go and let herself get raped/beaten up by her husband, I'm one of the strong women, we're not some pathetic Victorian era couch-fainting victims " type of thing.) It's tricky.

Lol yes meant mixed sex! Blame Jan 1st and a late night .

yes I think it’s because many of us, myself included, do want to be sympathetic to trans people. Get it that for them mixed sex facilities are preferable. However, it’s a bit like if you only have a hammer everything looks like a nail isn’t it…the problems isn’t about toilets. Or gender division in sport’s competitions. The whole situation of some people feeling they need to change sex and declare it to the world and then be discriminated and persisted for it in turn, is the bloody patriarchy in the first place. If there’s wasn’t such a need to insist that some characteristics were female and some male in terms of gender roles and rights, I think people would just feel
comforTable living in what we now perceive as a feminine or masculine way even if that didn’t match their genitalia. All the division and stereotyping which creates rigid structures and misogyny and gender based violence.
But this is a huge huge power dynamic to challenge and change. And while it has not been solved, We have to face the real world. And that’s a world in which women are subjected to violence and sexual harassment by men at a regular basis. So women don’t want to take their pants down in a room where a stranger man may be in the next cubicle.

Insisting on mixed sex toilets is equivalent to taking away welfare and expecting all the poor people to just magically starting to feed themselves. Come to think of it, that’s what the right wing has done in the US, with their ridiculous myth of meritocracy and bootstraps. Other countries that have implemented unisex toilets are China and Japan, countries with notoriously uneven gender roles. Oh, and Canada, where at least they’re trying to implement gender equality at a national scale through various initiatives, but have also jumped the gun on the unisex toilet thing and put the cart before the horse.

thecherryfox · 01/01/2025 21:35

i was in an abusive relationship, the idea of being alone in an enclosed space with a strange man terrifies me and likely would set me straight into a panic attack. About 1/3 women go through an abusive relationship or sexual assault at some point in their lives so forcing them to be uncomfortable in a place where they have to partially undress knowing men would be on the other side of the door is terrifying.

With the statistics stated and women being more or less half of the population, the minority of non binary people that inclusive toilets are trying to cater to is crazy when they’re the minority and the people uncomfortable outweighs the people who would benefit from it.

MsAmerica · 09/01/2025 00:37

WinterCrow · 30/12/2024 02:50

No, I do not believe that ArcheryAnnie wrote that at all, otherwise she would have typed that or a very close resemblance to that.

In case I wasn't clear enough, I was just pointing out the inherent fallacy of her writing.

Helleofabore · 09/01/2025 02:50

MsAmerica · 09/01/2025 00:37

In case I wasn't clear enough, I was just pointing out the inherent fallacy of her writing.

But it is your answer and the fallacy about mixed sex toilets at home that is the fallacy.

Because no toilet at home is being used by strangers coming off the street to use the toilet in the way a public toilet is used. Or do you allow anyone who knocks to use your toilet at home ?

Plus, a female who lives alone and occasionally allows a male friend to use the toilet not only has the right to say to the male friend that they shouldn’t visit. Therefore they can completely restrict access.

But even if they allow access, they already have prior experience with that male person that they can fall back on to shape their prediction of future risk of attack (or even mess.) So they can assess their likelihood of being attacked with very high rates of accuracy before making the decision to either allow that well known male to use the toilet or for that woman to use the single cubicle toilet in the house with the male being present in the other rooms while she is using the toilet . Archeryannie points this out.

Plus it is a single cubicle and the resident of that home is not trying to use the adjacent toilet cubicle as well.

I think you will find your analogy is the fallacious one and that the ‘home toilet’ analogy was always a false analogy at worst, or a very weak one full of very obvious holes at best. When I read your post, I thought you were posting sarcastic humour because the ‘unisex toilet at home’ analogy has been pointed out to be so badly flawed.

Hairyesterdaygonetoday · 09/01/2025 03:28

Cinnabarmotheaten · 28/12/2024 22:21

Why are we wanting to make life worse instead of better? Why aren't we ensuring women and girls are safer not exposed to yet more danger and why on earth do we want to add unnecessary fear and anxiety to daily activities like work, travel, shopping?

I hate unisex toilets for all the reasons mentioned by PPs and feel vulnerable and uneasy in communal unisex toilets,

Exactly this. What was wrong with separate toilets for men and women? Why should safety and convenience be jettisoned?

HelenInHeels · 09/01/2025 22:49

I went in a gender neutral toilet today at work. One toilet only and a man came out just before I went in. You've never seen me move so quickly. Wee all over the floor and it stank wicked. I'd rather piss my pants.

MsAmerica · 13/01/2025 22:49

Helleofabore · 09/01/2025 02:50

But it is your answer and the fallacy about mixed sex toilets at home that is the fallacy.

Because no toilet at home is being used by strangers coming off the street to use the toilet in the way a public toilet is used. Or do you allow anyone who knocks to use your toilet at home ?

Plus, a female who lives alone and occasionally allows a male friend to use the toilet not only has the right to say to the male friend that they shouldn’t visit. Therefore they can completely restrict access.

But even if they allow access, they already have prior experience with that male person that they can fall back on to shape their prediction of future risk of attack (or even mess.) So they can assess their likelihood of being attacked with very high rates of accuracy before making the decision to either allow that well known male to use the toilet or for that woman to use the single cubicle toilet in the house with the male being present in the other rooms while she is using the toilet . Archeryannie points this out.

Plus it is a single cubicle and the resident of that home is not trying to use the adjacent toilet cubicle as well.

I think you will find your analogy is the fallacious one and that the ‘home toilet’ analogy was always a false analogy at worst, or a very weak one full of very obvious holes at best. When I read your post, I thought you were posting sarcastic humour because the ‘unisex toilet at home’ analogy has been pointed out to be so badly flawed.

None of that was mentioned in the OP's initial post. I was just responding to what was written.

Helleofabore · 14/01/2025 06:41

MsAmerica · 13/01/2025 22:49

None of that was mentioned in the OP's initial post. I was just responding to what was written.

And I am responding to your posts. The concepts you have written about in your posts about ‘unisex toilets’ in people’s homes.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 14/01/2025 06:49

Floor to ceiling toilets generally have an emergency opening (with a coin) on the outside. This can and does get opened by entitled and dodgy people - usually male.

Makes accessible toilets out of the question when you've had somebody open it when you're using it - so a mixed toilet where there is no alarm cord to pull to at least draw attention to there being a problem is absolutely out of the question in my opinion.

JHound · 14/01/2025 06:56

I must be one of the few who massively prefers floor to ceiling toilets. I hate the gaps under toilet stalls

AuxArmesCitoyens · 14/01/2025 07:39

This is why the door gap exists: www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgzgnw62k4o

New posts on this thread. Refresh page