Wondering what others would do in this situation

[farmergirl15]

Person A told person B that their DC was poorly on a Thursday, their DC was off school for two days. There was a weekend away planned with a club.
Person B assumed person A's DC would not be attending as they hadn't been at school and said as much to person A. Person A rang Person B shouting so Person B hung up and informed person C who is in charge of said club. It was originally decided that person a's DC could attend as person a said that their dc wasn't poorly on the Friday, they were off for a family emergency. Then person C made the decision that person A's DC could not attend. Person B messaged person A to let them know and provided contact details for person c. Person A rang person C and shouted at them also.
Persons B and C feel that persons A DC should transfer to a different club, however Person B also feels that the DC shouldn't suffer because of Person A's behaviour.
So AIBU let the DC stay even tho person A has threatened volunteers of the club
Or AINBU transfer the DC out, nobody should be threatened especially when they're volunteering.
Person A and person B are acquaintances at school, person B and C are volunteers.

@MrsMitford3
i think the answer to you question is
The trains travelling away from London 🥴

Sorry, this reads like a GCSE maths question.

If my child was ill Thursday & starting to feel better Friday, I am stumped as to why I would punish them by not letting them go on a planned trip when they had got better.

your op is so confusing, but you sound like the person that has overstepped here is you.

Me too, except I only I got as far as “Person A told person B” before I gave up! Then I scanned the comments to see if it was just me.

So OP says she doesn't know what the illness was but then decided that it was a contagious illness, that was still contagious on Sat morning. Surely the OP knows that there are some illness that stop being contagious or were never contagious in the first place.

And whether the OP would make her child stay home all weekend due to not being in school on Friday is irrelevant. We can't run groups on the basis of what we would do as parents.

The Mum shouting is also troubling to me. Of course that's not the way to do it but if this is the main thing we look at we are looking at the reaction not the cause ie someone making a very high handed decision about a child's illness and that seems unfair.

I haven't actually been told what the illness was or wasn't
You are joking? So you automatically decide that it was an illness and one that was contagious. Why?

It could have been an asthma flair up, a slight twisted ankle, a tooth ache, a migraine, but YOU decided to take matters in your own hands and prevent a child who might been very much looking forward to go, and prevent it for no good reason.

People like you are extremely unpleasant. Don't get involved in what you don't know.

They can be made up...

Was the child infectious?

No

The organiser should have spoken to the mother and made an informed decision

I can't see Person A B and C. Please give them names or my head scrambles.

Op you are a real piece of work. You can’t even see how wrong you were. It’s astonishing the level of your denial!