What I do find a bit OTT about this thread is that, so far as I can tell (and I could be wrong) everyone does seem to think there is a line, somewhere, as to what sorts of sex toys (if any) should be on display in a supermarket. For some, the line is "sex toys shouldn't be displayed at all", for others it's "vibrators are okay if they don't look like penises" and for some it's "vibrators, butt plugs, cock rings and 'milder' items are okay, but not S&M stuff".
I don't think any of those viewpoints, or others inbetween them, are plainly and obviously unreasonable to the point that they deserve derision.
I do think there's a lot of misrepresenting of poster's positions, too. Obviously we saw a lot of that with regards to @MartinCrieffsLemon , who was unduly smeared as some sort of sex offender, but I think it applies to @valentinka31 too.
As with when I stood up for the former, I don't agree with the latter's view either, but I do feel as though they are being persistently and grossly misrepresented. They are saying, so far as I can tell, that they are concerned that the presence of vibrators on store shelves may cause girls to think they are an expected part of sex, which might cause some girls who would prefer not to use them (or have them used on them) to feel pressured. She isn't saying that women shouldn't use them but is worried that normalization (by being on the shelves of everyday stores) = expectation.
Again, I don't agree with that particular concern but if people want to voice objection to it, there are reasonable responses to it. It is not reasonable, in my view, to characterize her as being against women having orgasms or that they should not use vibrators.
A separate and largely unrelated point to the above, a lot of posters are airing the view "if you don't want your child to see the sex toys, don't take them down that aisle - or, if they ask, give them an age-apporpriate explanation - even that 'it's for adults'".
That works if you're there with your child but Tesco and other supermarkets are places that children (say tweenage or older) may well go to without parental supervision on occasion. Maybe with a group of friends. Personally, I'm not sure that its ideal for children to be introduced to the concept of, for example, sticking things up yours or others' butt's, for fun, outside of a sex ed class or similar setting.
If that means that we need to have more fulsome sex education at earlier ages, I'm not against that, and obviously the presence of sex toys in supermarkets is faaaaar from the only way society exposes children to sexual concepts that are beyond their years, but I do think there's a fair argument that it represents another example of children being potentially exposed to sex (and in some cases, kink) at younger ages than was once the norm, and possibly before they have relevant and important contextual knowledge.