Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Shannon Matthews musical. Sorry but I’m laughing

192 replies

MaryBerrysEyelashes · 25/10/2024 07:33

At the song titles šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚

Shannon Matthews musical. Sorry but I’m laughing
Shannon Matthews musical. Sorry but I’m laughing
OP posts:
TopG77 · 25/10/2024 11:18

How anyone could consider this funny is beyond me. That child went through severe trauma that will follow her into adult life and then some sicko decides to turn that into a musical? How will she ever move on with something like this in the public domain? They should be forced to donate all proceeds of this to the NSPCC (because there are bound to be people sad enough to actually go and watch it). Welcome to 21st century Britain; selfish, amoral and brain dead.

redtrain123 · 25/10/2024 11:20

PersephonePotts · 25/10/2024 11:03

TBH each to their own but I group people who find this funny in the same group who laugh at Mrs Brown’s Boys. Says it all really

Err, no. Completely different kettle of fish. For a start, one is fiction, and one is fact.

Lookslikemeemaw · 25/10/2024 11:23

yarnbarn · 25/10/2024 09:41

@Lookslikemeemaw

I’m not going to anything that features paedophiles …

I'm not asking you to. I would not go either, but as a comparison a musical about someone's music and a musical about someone being abused and kidnapped by their own family, well they are not the same.

Okay then I’m not going to anything showing paedophiles or abusers of children or the music of paedophiles and abusers? Is that better, pedant?

TopG77 · 25/10/2024 11:24

MaryBerrysEyelashes · 25/10/2024 07:38

There have been musicals about worse
French Revolution, er.. sweeny Todd

and ofc the movie of Cats 😩😩

None of those things involve living survivors of serious abuse who are likely to be traumatised by having the story of their abuse turned into a money spinner by some opportunist who has no moral compass.

IVFmumoftwo · 25/10/2024 11:27

MaryBerrysEyelashes · 25/10/2024 07:38

There have been musicals about worse
French Revolution, er.. sweeny Todd

and ofc the movie of Cats 😩😩

Les Mis is not about the French Revolution.

BlondeFool · 25/10/2024 11:27

TopG77 · 25/10/2024 11:18

How anyone could consider this funny is beyond me. That child went through severe trauma that will follow her into adult life and then some sicko decides to turn that into a musical? How will she ever move on with something like this in the public domain? They should be forced to donate all proceeds of this to the NSPCC (because there are bound to be people sad enough to actually go and watch it). Welcome to 21st century Britain; selfish, amoral and brain dead.

This.

Absolutely disgusting.

ExtraOnions · 25/10/2024 11:31

…but it’s a joke, it’s ok to laugh at Trauma, or abuse, or disability .. because it’s comedy.

You’ll find plenty of people on here who will defend that, in particular when it comes to the king of ā€œpunch downā€ humour Ricky Gervais.

If he had come up with it, it would be on a Netflix Special, as a shining endorsement of Comedy and Free Speech

… remember, even Rape Jokes are funny if you are Jimmy Carr.

spookyscaryseagulls · 25/10/2024 11:32

PersephonePotts · 25/10/2024 11:03

TBH each to their own but I group people who find this funny in the same group who laugh at Mrs Brown’s Boys. Says it all really

It's really not. I can't say I'm a big fan of MBB but we went to the live show with a group of disabled young adults. He and the rest of the cast were absolutely amazing and respectful with the young people. They really ensured they had a brilliant afternoon and took time for photos and autographs etc.

MangoRose · 25/10/2024 11:39

The major difference with other musicals is that this is a complete piss take, Les Mis and Miss Saigon and such like look at the subject matter very seriously, it would never be acceptable to make a programme taking the piss out of it, even serious documentaries are considered in bad taste.

5128gap · 25/10/2024 11:41

Half wit mysogynist has to raise the profile of some doggerel set to music by insulting MN users? If that's considered necessary to drum up interest in the show its probably not the best recommendation for its quality, whatever your thoughts on the subject matter.

TopG77 · 25/10/2024 11:42

ExtraOnions · 25/10/2024 11:31

…but it’s a joke, it’s ok to laugh at Trauma, or abuse, or disability .. because it’s comedy.

You’ll find plenty of people on here who will defend that, in particular when it comes to the king of ā€œpunch downā€ humour Ricky Gervais.

If he had come up with it, it would be on a Netflix Special, as a shining endorsement of Comedy and Free Speech

… remember, even Rape Jokes are funny if you are Jimmy Carr.

Laughing at those things in a general context is a completely different issue. It’s questionable why anyone would make jokes about such things but they’re directly harming anyone by doing so. The issue is that the subject of this ā€œcomedyā€ is a real person who suffered horrendous abuse. To turn that into a musical is a gross invasion of that girl’s privacy and dignity and could potentially cause significant psychological harm. Abused children have the right to be protected from further harm and I’m amazed that the human rights lawyers haven’t gotten involved in this.

yarnbarn · 25/10/2024 11:51

@Lookslikemeemaw

Okay then I’m not going to anything showing paedophiles or abusers of children or the music of paedophiles and abusers? Is that better, pedant?

Not sure what you are annoyed about here?

I was saying this musical is worse becsue it is specifically about the abused person, not about an abusers music.

If you choose to get defensive and call me pedantic for pointing out the non comparative nature here, that's definitely your issue.

I'm not a supporter of any of the above, but I can see a very clear difference in a show about the music of Michael Jackson and a show about the literal abuse of a child, containing songs as detailed in the OP.

IVFmumoftwo · 25/10/2024 11:55

There is an underlying feeling of laughing at people from council estates, on benefits type of people here.

ExtraOnions · 25/10/2024 12:09

TopG77 · 25/10/2024 11:42

Laughing at those things in a general context is a completely different issue. It’s questionable why anyone would make jokes about such things but they’re directly harming anyone by doing so. The issue is that the subject of this ā€œcomedyā€ is a real person who suffered horrendous abuse. To turn that into a musical is a gross invasion of that girl’s privacy and dignity and could potentially cause significant psychological harm. Abused children have the right to be protected from further harm and I’m amazed that the human rights lawyers haven’t gotten involved in this.

I think this whole thing is much more likely an exercise on the ethics of Free Speech.

ITV make a Shannon Mathews Drama.. and this is ok, but a musical is not - you have to question
why. ITV make the drama to make money .. is that ok? Is it laughing that’s the problem, or the subject matter ? I doubt it’s the subject matter, as that has been covered hundreds of times. Which means there must be a list of thing that are not to be laughed at .. not sure what that is, or who decides.

Alan Carr made a joke about Shannon Mathews, he seems to be doing ok. Frankie Boyle ditto

TBH .. none of us even know what the musical is about, could be a critique of the sensationalist media .. who knows

CherryTreeDream · 25/10/2024 12:17

Let me get this straight:

Shannon Mathews was abused and used as part of a plot to try and make money for her abusers.

Now this musical is also trying to make money from Shannon Mathews by making a show about what happened to her. According to the writer anyone who objects to this is a ā€˜Karen’? But presumably anyone watching the show is supposed to laugh at the stupidity of the people abusing Shannon and using her in a plot to make money??

..Yeah, call me Karen on this one.

TopG77 · 25/10/2024 12:47

ExtraOnions · 25/10/2024 12:09

I think this whole thing is much more likely an exercise on the ethics of Free Speech.

ITV make a Shannon Mathews Drama.. and this is ok, but a musical is not - you have to question
why. ITV make the drama to make money .. is that ok? Is it laughing that’s the problem, or the subject matter ? I doubt it’s the subject matter, as that has been covered hundreds of times. Which means there must be a list of thing that are not to be laughed at .. not sure what that is, or who decides.

Alan Carr made a joke about Shannon Mathews, he seems to be doing ok. Frankie Boyle ditto

TBH .. none of us even know what the musical is about, could be a critique of the sensationalist media .. who knows

Free speech doesn’t include illegality and never has. If I write things online about someone that are libellous, then I can expect to be sued. If I make a Facebook post instructing people to go and kill a politician, for example, then I will find myself facing criminal charges.
I’d say that they’re treading on thin ice here legally as Shannon Matthews is likely to be classed as vulnerable because she is a child and is a victim of a serious crime. If she suffers harm (physical or psychological) as a result of this then they could definitely find themselves facing legal action. I’d say that there are probably adequate grounds for an injunction at the very least. It wouldn’t be difficult to prove that this could cause significant psychological harm.

TopG77 · 25/10/2024 12:52

IVFmumoftwo · 25/10/2024 11:55

There is an underlying feeling of laughing at people from council estates, on benefits type of people here.

I know. I find it amazing that the people who mostly do this claim to be left leaning ā€œprogressivesā€.

Sartre · 25/10/2024 12:53

I think it’s ’funny’ because the family in question were extremely deprived, uneducated and working-class which goes to show how classist we still are in this country.

I feel for Shannon above all else. She will have spent her life trying to forget about this, now some jumped up private school twats have decided to make a comedy sketch about her.

Sartre · 25/10/2024 12:55

ExtraOnions · 25/10/2024 12:09

I think this whole thing is much more likely an exercise on the ethics of Free Speech.

ITV make a Shannon Mathews Drama.. and this is ok, but a musical is not - you have to question
why. ITV make the drama to make money .. is that ok? Is it laughing that’s the problem, or the subject matter ? I doubt it’s the subject matter, as that has been covered hundreds of times. Which means there must be a list of thing that are not to be laughed at .. not sure what that is, or who decides.

Alan Carr made a joke about Shannon Mathews, he seems to be doing ok. Frankie Boyle ditto

TBH .. none of us even know what the musical is about, could be a critique of the sensationalist media .. who knows

ITV made a serious drama which I haven’t seen but I’m assuming it largely followed the facts.

This musical is a comedy sketch taking the piss out of her and the abuse and neglect she experienced as a child.

Butchyrestingface · 25/10/2024 12:57

MaryBerrysEyelashes · 25/10/2024 07:52

Well, don’t be too snobby about it because it’s sold out at four week run at the Edinburgh festival

Take it you're going?

Hold firm, Karens of Mumsnet. Producer was clearly trying to drum up publicity with that quote.

BarryGw · 25/10/2024 13:03

I figured I'd find a thread on here.
While I can understand people's initial outrage (let's look at the title, but not do any further research), the piece itself actually spends it's entire running time mocking Karen Matthews and her barmy scheme to attempt to make £50,000. Shannon is referenced, but is not portrayed. And she is certainly not mocked.
While, certain aspects may have been slightly exaggerated for effect, the movie is based on hard facts:
Karen Matthews DID these things.
Craig Meehan WAS convicted of having child porn on his laptop.
Shannon WAS kept at Michael Donovan's place.
Probably best to just take it all with a pinch of salt if it's not your thing. Musical mockery is nothing new. From Weird Al Yankovic to the Barron Knights.
Yes, Shannon is a real person and she did nothing wrong. But there are numerous documentaries and portrayals of so many innocent people, and not all are flattering. Some are downright evil, but some have a sense of humour.
At the end of the day, there are probably more important things to be concerned with out there.

TopG77 · 25/10/2024 13:03

Sartre · 25/10/2024 12:53

I think it’s ’funny’ because the family in question were extremely deprived, uneducated and working-class which goes to show how classist we still are in this country.

I feel for Shannon above all else. She will have spent her life trying to forget about this, now some jumped up private school twats have decided to make a comedy sketch about her.

Those are the people who are the most despised in today’s society. And the saddest thing is that the people who despise them the most tend to be those who identify as ā€œleft wingā€ and ā€œprogressiveā€. Just look at the grooming gang scandal in Greater Manchester. Nobody gave a damn because the girls involved were from poor, dysfunctional backgrounds.

PattiLupone12 · 25/10/2024 13:12

Think we need to have a long hard look about true crime as entertainment and where this has taken us.

CocoapuffPuff · 25/10/2024 13:12

BarryGw · 25/10/2024 13:03

I figured I'd find a thread on here.
While I can understand people's initial outrage (let's look at the title, but not do any further research), the piece itself actually spends it's entire running time mocking Karen Matthews and her barmy scheme to attempt to make £50,000. Shannon is referenced, but is not portrayed. And she is certainly not mocked.
While, certain aspects may have been slightly exaggerated for effect, the movie is based on hard facts:
Karen Matthews DID these things.
Craig Meehan WAS convicted of having child porn on his laptop.
Shannon WAS kept at Michael Donovan's place.
Probably best to just take it all with a pinch of salt if it's not your thing. Musical mockery is nothing new. From Weird Al Yankovic to the Barron Knights.
Yes, Shannon is a real person and she did nothing wrong. But there are numerous documentaries and portrayals of so many innocent people, and not all are flattering. Some are downright evil, but some have a sense of humour.
At the end of the day, there are probably more important things to be concerned with out there.

Goodness, could you possibly be more patronising?

"Pat on the head, there there, nothing to worry your pretty little heads about, over-reacting again dearies? Here I am with my sensible explanation that'll help your little lady brains understand the COMPLEX issues here......don't worry about it, it's aaaaaall fine."

BarryGw · 25/10/2024 13:13

TopG77 · 25/10/2024 12:47

Free speech doesn’t include illegality and never has. If I write things online about someone that are libellous, then I can expect to be sued. If I make a Facebook post instructing people to go and kill a politician, for example, then I will find myself facing criminal charges.
I’d say that they’re treading on thin ice here legally as Shannon Matthews is likely to be classed as vulnerable because she is a child and is a victim of a serious crime. If she suffers harm (physical or psychological) as a result of this then they could definitely find themselves facing legal action. I’d say that there are probably adequate grounds for an injunction at the very least. It wouldn’t be difficult to prove that this could cause significant psychological harm.

Interesting post....
Not libelous as it is factual, just told with humour.
Shannon was a child in 2008! It's now 16 years later, she's in her mid 20's. That's how age works.