Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

So no extra funding for MH conditions or eating disorders just weight loss jabs!

184 replies

Gr3ySkies · 15/10/2024 08:36

It’s nuts!

So many people struggling with quite severe MH conditions on massive waiting lists getting nothing.

People dying of EDS. Because there are no inpatient beds and huge waits for treatment but apparantly we can fund weight loss jabs to anybody who wants them. 🤔

Even though we know very little about the long term impact.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Sailonsilverrgirl · 16/10/2024 10:35

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

itwasnevermine · 16/10/2024 10:35

fuckyourpronouns · 16/10/2024 10:35

Big pharma taking over

All the press is harping on about at the min is medicating people to within an inch of their lives. It makes me incredibly uncomfortable.

Weight loss injections are not a short term prospect. The reality is that people end up on them for life.

Who is winning with that approach? It's not the individual nor the NHS - because they will have other issues that come off the back of this. Yes it's been tested for diabetes for a fair while. Not for anything else to decide long term effects.

What other issues will we have, sorry?

The results do not change the fact that these medicines have been tested for a long long time.

WhosPink · 16/10/2024 10:43

Gr3ySkies · 15/10/2024 08:46

But why not fund the MH causes of obesity. And going forward why should those with obesity just get free jabs whilst those struggling with EDs are just left on waiting lists?

Because anti-obesity drugs are a relatively easy and cheap win with potentially massive returns in terms of the health of the nation. Obesity is a public health crisis and eating disorders are not. Mental health is, but there's no easy and cheap fix. At the end of the day it's a cost-benefit calculation, and the benefit to the health of the nation, and therefore the economy, of reducing the obesity epidemic using relatively cheap drugs far outweighs the costs.

If there was a magic injection that fixed mental health problems, and it was not being funded, then you would have a point. But sadly there isn't.

Evilartsgrad · 16/10/2024 10:47

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 15/10/2024 08:39

apparantly we can fund weight loss jabs to anybody who wants them. 🤔

Pardon?

All that has been proposed is a very small scale trial, the outcome of which is not guaranteed success, so there are fair few steps yet before we get anywhere remotely close to a situation whereby weightloss drugs are dished out to "anybody who wants them".

Quite. But God forbid those evil fatties get anything!
Not one, btw. Fat anyway. See username.
I notice the hard of thinking have flocked to assure OP she's right, though.

InWalksBarberalla · 16/10/2024 12:00

Gr3ySkies · 16/10/2024 08:47

Is it not food choices too which won’t necessarily change?Doctors have voiced concerns re users putting weight back on when jab usage ends.

Any NHS wait list ends up costing the nhs more. There seems to be a huge discrepancy re what is deemed important and what ismt. Child mental health, adult mental health don’t seem to be of any concern at all. I’m pretty disgusted with labour. Is this all they consider important and can come up with?

Well no the government don't really care about any people at all. People are resources (in that their work boosts productivity and income) or costs to an economy. The UK has a growing obesity rate that will cost the economy. Hence the plan to reduce the costs via these medications. Well to start with a trial to confirm the cost benefit ratio.

Windchimesandsong · 16/10/2024 12:50

@Beautiful3 When you say your mum used to take the pills, do you mean amphetamines? I know they were a popular appetite suppressant in the 1950s.

Wonder what the difference is re side effects, potential long-term effects, and effectiveness between the old 1950s appetite suppressant "bennies" versus these new weight loss drugs?

MargoLivebetter · 16/10/2024 13:01

@Windchimesandsong amphetamines are incredibly addictive, I think that is one of the biggest issues with them. They can also give you high blood pressure and palpitations, very alert so you become sleep deficient. They were very effective for weight loss though.

Windchimesandsong · 16/10/2024 13:20

I don't know much about pep pills (amphetamines). Are they physically addictive (like needing to keep increasing dosage and/or physical withdrawal symptoms) or is it more psychological dependance?

They're still prescribed, I believe, for ADHD? So I assume they're considered safe enough in some circumstances, just no longer for weight loss.

Although, sleep deprivation is definitely a very bad side effect. In fact sleep deprivation can cause weight gain. I guess in the past people using pep pills dealt with that with sedatives/sleeping pills at bedtime.

Anyway I mentioned them because the poster mentioning her mum taking the pills reminded me that, whether a good idea or not, weight loss drugs are nothing new. Either on this thread or another thread yesterday, some posters were suggesting "in the past, nobody needed or took weight loss drugs". Except they did. Pep pills were very popular back in the day.

hughiedoesntfight · 16/10/2024 13:28

Gr3ySkies · 16/10/2024 07:32

Don’t think so. I have kids on multiple lengthy NHS waiting lists for a variety of things. I thought the NHS was strapped for cash.Those with Anorexia and MH struggles have to want to get better apparently but those with obesity just get an expensive jab. Many people with obesity do battle and succeed in overcoming it. Spending a fortune on NHS funding on a jab without changing lifestyle is ludicrous. Funding both the jab and treating MH needs with obesity alongside lifestyle change is ludicrously expensive in the current climate.

Yes you are.

These jabs are here and available. They have potential to change people’s lives, make them healthier and save the NHS money.

You seem to believe they should ignore its existence and possible impact, because they don’t have enough cash for every condition. Why?

If a jab became available for people with anorexia that helped resolve lots of problems and helped people recover, would you say the NHs should not look at using it because they don’t have the money look into the causes of obesity and treat those people?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page