Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not like being called by forename by kids

395 replies

BreakingDad77 · 09/10/2024 14:36

I don't know but somehow it feels odd when sons friends year 6 age range calling me by my forename. I haven't said anything but part of me feels I would prefer Mr surname or "sons name - dad".

OP posts:
raspberryberet7 · 06/11/2024 23:53

So strange. At what age would a person need to be for you not be offended by being called your actual given name?

ImthatBoleyngirl · 06/11/2024 23:54

You would hate DD's school. All the teachers are called by their first names, even the headteacher.

Calliopespa · 07/11/2024 00:11

raspberryberet7 · 06/11/2024 23:53

So strange. At what age would a person need to be for you not be offended by being called your actual given name?

I think it’s relationship not age.

So child of a close family friend: fine.

Random child in your DC’s class: a bit close and cloying

Calliopespa · 07/11/2024 00:13

ImthatBoleyngirl · 06/11/2024 23:54

You would hate DD's school. All the teachers are called by their first names, even the headteacher.

My DC’s school calls all the teachers by titles and the parents and teachers generally use that when addressing each other as well ( not teachers to teachers orvparents to parents though). I can’t see what’s wrong with that. It creates a courteous atmosphere.

PointsSouth · 07/11/2024 07:18

Calliopespa · 06/11/2024 23:49

Traditionally a forename was only for people who knew you well. Properly addressed is meaning for someone you feel doesn’t know you well enough to use your forename. It’s nothing to do with it not identifying you.

‘…someone you feel doesn’t know you well enough…’

So, it’s subjective. The person addressing you has to guess how you feel. How does that work?

Me, I make it easy for people. I feel everyone knows me well enough to call me by my firstname, and if they don’t do that, I ask them to.

With you, who’s to know what to call you? How are they to know how you feel and when that feeling might change? If they get it wrong, do you correct them? And if not, why not?

Calliopespa · 07/11/2024 07:24

PointsSouth · 07/11/2024 07:18

‘…someone you feel doesn’t know you well enough…’

So, it’s subjective. The person addressing you has to guess how you feel. How does that work?

Me, I make it easy for people. I feel everyone knows me well enough to call me by my firstname, and if they don’t do that, I ask them to.

With you, who’s to know what to call you? How are they to know how you feel and when that feeling might change? If they get it wrong, do you correct them? And if not, why not?

Edited

No I wouldn’t correct them.

I’m just explaining why I would sometimes prefer not to have my first name used, which was OP’s feeling too.

But, generally speaking, people are able to exercise both common sense and intuition: someone you have only seen a handful of times and not had any real conversations with other than formalities doesn’t know you well. It’s not really that challenging.

Calliopespa · 07/11/2024 07:26

Calliopespa · 07/11/2024 07:24

No I wouldn’t correct them.

I’m just explaining why I would sometimes prefer not to have my first name used, which was OP’s feeling too.

But, generally speaking, people are able to exercise both common sense and intuition: someone you have only seen a handful of times and not had any real conversations with other than formalities doesn’t know you well. It’s not really that challenging.

Eta … but I see you correct them.

What’s the difference? If someone doesn’t feel very comfortable calling you by your forename, I don’t see why they should be forced to - anymore than someone I’d prefer called me by my surname should be.

VeraYin · 07/11/2024 07:29

Yanbu. It is respectful to use title and surname.

PointsSouth · 07/11/2024 10:52

Calliopespa · 07/11/2024 07:24

No I wouldn’t correct them.

I’m just explaining why I would sometimes prefer not to have my first name used, which was OP’s feeling too.

But, generally speaking, people are able to exercise both common sense and intuition: someone you have only seen a handful of times and not had any real conversations with other than formalities doesn’t know you well. It’s not really that challenging.

They’re not going to intuit that unless they share your view of what’s ‘proper’.

If they don’t share it, they may do something you consider improper.

And this is the problem with this kind of social etiquette. It’s opaque. Those who break the rules either never know - which rather illustrates that the convention has no real significance - or they are corrected - which is patronising, and of no real benefit. And to do that would be ill-mannered, which is why you wouldn’t do it, I think. I imagine you’re very well-mannered. Me too, I hope.

There’s a useful distinction here. Good manners, I think, are generally intended to put the other party at ease. The function of etiquette is to codify behaviour so that people can identify each other as being from a similar background.

In other words, and generalising a bit, good manners are inclusive. Etiquette is exclusive.

PointsSouth · 07/11/2024 13:09

VeraYin · 07/11/2024 07:29

Yanbu. It is respectful to use title and surname.

I can assure you it’s not. If you were to insist that I or my children address you by your title and surname, my respect for you would be measurably diminished.

You may feel respected, but you’d be mistaken.

Makingchocolatecake · 07/11/2024 14:28

My 2 yo sometimes calls me and DH by our first names, be glad it's only his friends doing it!

HamptonPlace · 07/11/2024 16:01

PointsSouth · 07/11/2024 07:18

‘…someone you feel doesn’t know you well enough…’

So, it’s subjective. The person addressing you has to guess how you feel. How does that work?

Me, I make it easy for people. I feel everyone knows me well enough to call me by my firstname, and if they don’t do that, I ask them to.

With you, who’s to know what to call you? How are they to know how you feel and when that feeling might change? If they get it wrong, do you correct them? And if not, why not?

Edited

emmmm. re children.... their parents could teach them?

Calliopespa · 07/11/2024 16:43

PointsSouth · 07/11/2024 10:52

They’re not going to intuit that unless they share your view of what’s ‘proper’.

If they don’t share it, they may do something you consider improper.

And this is the problem with this kind of social etiquette. It’s opaque. Those who break the rules either never know - which rather illustrates that the convention has no real significance - or they are corrected - which is patronising, and of no real benefit. And to do that would be ill-mannered, which is why you wouldn’t do it, I think. I imagine you’re very well-mannered. Me too, I hope.

There’s a useful distinction here. Good manners, I think, are generally intended to put the other party at ease. The function of etiquette is to codify behaviour so that people can identify each other as being from a similar background.

In other words, and generalising a bit, good manners are inclusive. Etiquette is exclusive.

Edited

I do agree about manners being to out people at ease. But that’s why I hibestkhbyhinn it was simpler to go with children calling adults by a surname until the adult ( maybe) says “you can call me x if you like.”

Calliopespa · 07/11/2024 17:27

PointsSouth · 07/11/2024 10:52

They’re not going to intuit that unless they share your view of what’s ‘proper’.

If they don’t share it, they may do something you consider improper.

And this is the problem with this kind of social etiquette. It’s opaque. Those who break the rules either never know - which rather illustrates that the convention has no real significance - or they are corrected - which is patronising, and of no real benefit. And to do that would be ill-mannered, which is why you wouldn’t do it, I think. I imagine you’re very well-mannered. Me too, I hope.

There’s a useful distinction here. Good manners, I think, are generally intended to put the other party at ease. The function of etiquette is to codify behaviour so that people can identify each other as being from a similar background.

In other words, and generalising a bit, good manners are inclusive. Etiquette is exclusive.

Edited

I do agree about manners being to put people at ease and also with the point about a distinction between manners and etiquette. But that’s why I do think it was simpler when I was young with children calling adults by a surname. We all knew what to do, it wasn’t seen as pompous because that’s what you did and noone felt it was a bit intrusive. It was a safety net if knowing you were being polite. They haven’t got that safety net now, as, as this thread shows, some people don’t like it.

PointsSouth · 07/11/2024 19:45

Calliopespa · 07/11/2024 17:27

I do agree about manners being to put people at ease and also with the point about a distinction between manners and etiquette. But that’s why I do think it was simpler when I was young with children calling adults by a surname. We all knew what to do, it wasn’t seen as pompous because that’s what you did and noone felt it was a bit intrusive. It was a safety net if knowing you were being polite. They haven’t got that safety net now, as, as this thread shows, some people don’t like it.

Thing is, I don’t think that’s the kids’ problem. I think it’s the adults’.

PointsSouth · 07/11/2024 19:49

HamptonPlace · 07/11/2024 16:01

emmmm. re children.... their parents could teach them?

Why would one teach one’s children to comply with a social convention that one believes is empty of use or meaning?

CrystalTaliefero · 07/11/2024 20:07

I'm the opposite. I used to work at my children's school and know a lot of their friends. They can't get out of the habit of calling me Mrs K, even though I tell them every time to call me my name!

PemberleynotWemberley · 07/11/2024 20:12

I don't think you are unreasonable at all, @BreakingDad77 . My DS have been raised to use Mr/Mrs or other title until such time as the adult invites them to use first names. DS are 16 now and it's noticeable that friends' parents are doing this, but mostly weren't when they were younger. And now they are in the sixth form I generally invite their friends to call me by my first name once they have been to our house or we to theirs. My (American-born) DH would prefer to stretch the formality until they are 18 but is slowly adjusting. I don't see anything wrong in adults being treated with respect by other people's children. Similarly, I find it sad to hear young children using first names for their own parents, as it plays down the special relationship and unique responsibility parents owe to their children. I love and delight in my sons, but I'm their mother, not some friend amongst many.
Still, there are many ways to parent and (almost) all are valid!

Calliopespa · 07/11/2024 22:09

PointsSouth · 07/11/2024 19:49

Why would one teach one’s children to comply with a social convention that one believes is empty of use or meaning?

Well if you believed that you probably wouldn’t, which I’m guessing you didn’t.

VelvetUnderwear · 08/11/2024 03:07

This wouldn't bother me but if it does you, what's wrong with asking the kids to call you mrs/ms surname ? The kids won't know you mind if you don't tell them. They aren't mindreaders.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread