'Pp’s on this thread have made it clear they call trans women “men”, “boys” , “male”.'
For those reading along, this is what happens when people have a personal investment in supporting male people's philosophical beliefs that those male people are 'female'.
You get these sorts of statements. These male people are MALE people. Even if they have had their penises and testes removed, they are MALE people.
When you come across a poster who frames the correct sexing of a male person as being male, you do need to ask why that is. In this case, it could be because we are talking about male people in female changing rooms.
If there was no issue that even made the poster uncomfortable, they would be very happy with the statement that some 'male people' should be allowed to use the female single sex spaces. That would at least be an honest position.
Instead, they will claim that these male people are no longer 'male people.' That somehow they simply and materially no longer have a male body. ie one formed around the production of small gametes regardless of whether those gametes have or will be produced. This requires testes in any form.
Many males with trans identities fully accept that they are male people. And we know, many also respect female people and will not use the female single sex spaces. Therefore, any 'ally' who speaks for transgender people need to acknowledge that they are speaking for those who have extreme demands.
That they demand that they are treated as if they changed sex.
Why?
Because it is their philosophical belief that they are female.
What other philosophical beliefs do we treat as material reality and make significant safeguarding changes to policy for?