Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

for being upset as my dh has retired early (at 60) and expects me to keep working until 60 too, even though he is 10 years older than me

542 replies

MrsPuddle · 29/05/2024 12:53

I dont particularly enjoy my job or it would be ok, but now he is 65 and I am 55, I am getting resentful as he is out and about enjoying himself, going on lads holidays etc and I am stuck at home behind a screen. I just cant do this for another 5 years, but he cant see the problem. If we wait until I am 60 he will be 70 and he will be older and who knows, maybe not well, and not inclined to be active with me. We will have enough money, if we just tighten out belts in retirement. Has anyone else faced this issue with an older partner? thanks

OP posts:
Rottweilermummy · 31/05/2024 16:28

To add, having told my DH about this post he said turn it round, you are 65 and retired and your DH is 55 , would it be OK for him to retire and you tighten your belt to enable him to do so lol

LouDeLou · 31/05/2024 18:23

This is weird.

he should be spending his pension time with you, there is no way we aren’t retiring at the same time!

lads holidays???!!!

Flossyts · 01/06/2024 07:56

Have you drawn up a full budget for him- sometimes figures are easier to digest because it takes the emotion out of it. ‘Tighten out belts’ could mean anything from dropping 1 of 3 holidays a year to eating beans every meal. Also, have you considered a half way option- doing an extreme tight budget for a year or so whilst you are still working to save up an extra free buffer?

SwingingPonytail · 01/06/2024 12:41

It's all very odd.

If you're married to someone 10 years older, you're never going to catch them up age-wise and pension-wise.

You took on a new job at 54 when your H was already not working ( 4 years into his redundancy) so did he tell you then that you HAD to find a job?

It's odd that you left the security of a teaching job at 54 for one you hate now.

I think you left teaching with the intention of never working and being retired like him, and he protested, so you took the job you have now.

It's a marriage issue not just a money one.

StormingNorman · 01/06/2024 19:39

SwingingPonytail · 01/06/2024 12:41

It's all very odd.

If you're married to someone 10 years older, you're never going to catch them up age-wise and pension-wise.

You took on a new job at 54 when your H was already not working ( 4 years into his redundancy) so did he tell you then that you HAD to find a job?

It's odd that you left the security of a teaching job at 54 for one you hate now.

I think you left teaching with the intention of never working and being retired like him, and he protested, so you took the job you have now.

It's a marriage issue not just a money one.

Your spleen is being vented in the wrong direction. OP has been supporting her husband for the past five years. He retired when he was made redundant but his pension has only just kicked in. Her work, wherever it is and however much she dislikes it, has been supporting both of them.

SwingingPonytail · 02/06/2024 08:35

StormingNorman · 01/06/2024 19:39

Your spleen is being vented in the wrong direction. OP has been supporting her husband for the past five years. He retired when he was made redundant but his pension has only just kicked in. Her work, wherever it is and however much she dislikes it, has been supporting both of them.

@StormingNorman sorry to disagree with you.

Here, the H has been made redundant. We have no idea if he tried to get new employment at 60. OP hasn't said even when asked. Or if his redundancy package covered a lot of their outgoings. So you simply can't say she's been supporting him. And 'supporting' someone as if it's a kind of 'benefit' or financial transaction in marriage is a very odd idea.

With a 10 year age gap he was ALWAYS going to retire sooner, (ignoring the redundancy issue) so if the notion of her 'supporting him' was likely, why was it not discussed?

The issue here is they don't communicate. Or plan ahead.

And when the OP is challenged and asked questions to fill in the blanks, she disappears.

StormingNorman · 02/06/2024 08:37

SwingingPonytail · 02/06/2024 08:35

@StormingNorman sorry to disagree with you.

Here, the H has been made redundant. We have no idea if he tried to get new employment at 60. OP hasn't said even when asked. Or if his redundancy package covered a lot of their outgoings. So you simply can't say she's been supporting him. And 'supporting' someone as if it's a kind of 'benefit' or financial transaction in marriage is a very odd idea.

With a 10 year age gap he was ALWAYS going to retire sooner, (ignoring the redundancy issue) so if the notion of her 'supporting him' was likely, why was it not discussed?

The issue here is they don't communicate. Or plan ahead.

And when the OP is challenged and asked questions to fill in the blanks, she disappears.

Re-read the OP’s posts. Everything I have said is in there.

CovertPiggery · 02/06/2024 09:11

SwingingPonytail · 02/06/2024 08:35

@StormingNorman sorry to disagree with you.

Here, the H has been made redundant. We have no idea if he tried to get new employment at 60. OP hasn't said even when asked. Or if his redundancy package covered a lot of their outgoings. So you simply can't say she's been supporting him. And 'supporting' someone as if it's a kind of 'benefit' or financial transaction in marriage is a very odd idea.

With a 10 year age gap he was ALWAYS going to retire sooner, (ignoring the redundancy issue) so if the notion of her 'supporting him' was likely, why was it not discussed?

The issue here is they don't communicate. Or plan ahead.

And when the OP is challenged and asked questions to fill in the blanks, she disappears.

OP did say that they lived off her income until his small pension kicked in.

I definitely think you should retire early OP. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

This thread prompted me to chat with my husband about retirement as he's older than me. I hadn't thought about it before & I imagine that's completely normal. He said he'd just assumed I'd retire early so we could enjoy the best years together and that's what he's been planning for.

MumOfTwoLittleOnes24 · 02/06/2024 09:32

Retire now, OP!

For those saying "oh, but you should have financially planned for the disparity in your ages" and "he's done his time, you'll just have to carry on until 60 like him, that's only fair" etc etc.....that's just nonsense.

On that basis then the DH should also have financially planned for all the extra costs he'll personally have when he's, say 75 and OP is 65, right?

Need a carer whilst you're recovering from that new hip when you turn 72, DH? Sorry, you'll just have to sort out and finance a care package as (as a 62 year old youngster 😜) will be off on my girls' holiday (you know, like the ones you had between 60-65 years of age), only fair, yeah?

Oh and there won't be many foreign holidays for us as a couple DH as now you're over 70 your travel insurance premium will be prohibitive (for you, not me!)

and so on and so on....

The point is that when you marry someone you become a couple and a team and you want the best for each other. So of course OP will look after DH when he's very old even though (in all likelihood) he won't be doing the same for her.

OP, you've financially supported your husband for the last 5 years and he's (deservedly) enjoyed his retirement but now he has his private pension and the means to support you both (even with a bit of belt tightening) he should be very happy to do so and release you from a job that you are simply not enjoying.

Also, his state pension should kick in at 66 (I think!) - that'll help too surely?

SwingingPonytail · 02/06/2024 11:46

StormingNorman · 02/06/2024 08:37

Re-read the OP’s posts. Everything I have said is in there.

@StormingNorman Can't you see that her posts are from only her perspective.

I've read all her posts. And I believe she's being very selective with what she said. She won't say if he got a pay-out, for instance and it's clear that she only wanted posts that agreed with her.

No one gets made redundant without some kind of package at 60, assuming he'd been working for some time.
I know people who got a year or more in salary, tax free.

And I strongly disagree with the very notion that in marriage one person 'lives off' the other. That's not a marriage.

You're losing sight of her question which is why can't she retire now.

She can. She says they can manage financially.

rainman24 · 02/06/2024 12:28

I know people who got a year or more in salary, tax free.

You can only get £30k tax free in redundancy money. The rest is taxable.

Iwasafool · 05/06/2024 20:34

rainman24 · 02/06/2024 12:28

I know people who got a year or more in salary, tax free.

You can only get £30k tax free in redundancy money. The rest is taxable.

Some people don't earn more than £30k a year.

listmaker1981 · 05/06/2024 22:17

MrsPuddle · 29/05/2024 13:08

Ah well I thought marriage was a partnership and you share? If I had said I wanted to take time out to look after the kids, (I didnt) I wonder if thats more acceptable?

Totally agree, our money has always been 'our' money. Never 'his' or 'mine'. We make financial decisions together. I find it very odd when couples call it 'his' or 'my' money, but I guess everyone has their own way that works for them

Mummy2024 · 14/06/2024 18:30

MrsPuddle · 29/05/2024 13:01

yes, certainly, I dont expect him to work, but somehow his pension (which is much bigger than mine) seems to be ..maybe, feels more his than mine? We have never had money disagreements before but I always worked.

If your pension is really small then you shouldn't retire. It's all very well saying if we tighten our belts we will survive, 25 years with prices doing nothing but rising is a very long time to try and survive.

You could claim your pension and then go part time but even that I wouldn't recommend you need all the years you can get to build up the pension. You could still drop a day though.

RoseUnder · 14/06/2024 23:50

Tell you DH to take responsibility for filling his own days. Job, volunteering or hobby.

OP it is most strategic for you to keep working, lean in, get promotions, maximise your income while you’re in your 40s

kayla22 · 14/06/2024 23:56

Surely you knew at some point this day would come given that he is 10 years older than you? This obviously didn't come as a shock to you that you'd need to work on after he retired ?

SashaPicklepops · 15/06/2024 18:32

Is it possible for you to go part time for the 5 years then retire, then it won't be such a financial impact on you both? If not the just retire and enjoy your time together if that's what you really want and can afford too.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread