Wasn't it wonderful when we had words that described the biological reality and there was one word that described the class of humans with bodies capable of requiring maternity services to give birth?
And no, if a woman doesn't agree that society should be divided by a made up, regressive notion of gender and therefore doesn't 'identify' as cis, it doesn't make her trans or non binary. She's a woman, just like every other human who might require maternity care for the birthing of her baby.
On an individual level it is clearly polite to address a person as they wish to be addressed but this is going to far. What it is really doing is making the word woman meaningless. It is beyond offensive to claim to women have more in common with trans women/ men (on the basis of what exactly? / Stereotypes) than the women who identify as trans men and then require maternity services.
'Women' are not a set of stereotypes, we are not non men or non trans/ non-binary. We are not 'other'. We are fully human and are necessary to ensure the continued existence of the human race, everyone of us was born because a woman gave birth to us, many many of us do not consent to this erasure. The fact that some women deny that they are women and then go on to do the thing that only women can do does not mean that we should consent to this erasure to make them feel better about their delusions.
That you cannot see the societal harm in this is baffling to me.
Women and children are the losers every time to this identity quasi religion. I thought that one of the key aspects for HCPs was 'first do no harm'. To blindly back something that is clearly harmful as a HCP is frankly beyond the pale at this point.