@Sirzy ,
But it is about the level of privilege.
Having taught in a private school, I struggle to see the boys being more privileged in most ways. Both sexes have equal university ambitions, both are looking at middle class careers, both expect healthy relationships and, on the whole, to settle down and marry well. I still hear the less academic girls talk of ‘marrying rich’, which I have only heard once from a boy in my entire time teaching.
Boys are still louder and dominate the space in lunchtime and breaks, an area where their size and testosterone gives them privilege. OTOH, teachers tend to favour the girls and they do get away with more. The detention lists were about 4:1 boys/girls. In addition, many would argue that the way we the school system teaches favours the way girls learn, hence them outperforming by a significant margin.
Oh, and ‘toxic masculinity’ is a very popular phrase these days but what is the difference between ‘toxic masculinity’ and just plain old ‘masculinity’? Even if you can clearly see this, a lot of the messaging that boys get in schools (or hear even where schools are careful not to say it) is that they were born with the potential to be ‘toxic’. That is quite a grim message to be giving teens trying to find their identities in the world.
Now, I have also been a governor of a state school with a very different demographic. Many of children depend on their hot free meal as the main meal of the day, many wouldn’t consider university as the next step at all. They are not going home to warm houses or helped with their homework by parents.
If male privilege exists at the upper end of the income and education scale, which I am far from convinced of, and we look at the step analogy. Sex is worth 1cm whereas wealth is worth 1m.