Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be losing attraction to DP because of his career?

332 replies

breezea · 18/04/2024 14:18

I expect to be told I’m a nasty son so for this.

But AIBU to think I might be losing attraction to DP slightly because of his career?

We are both late 20s. Met at uni where we were both doing PhDs. Been together four years and lived together for three. He is a wonderful guy and although we had pretty serious issues early on, for the past two years it’s been great. We have our own niggles but don’t we all?

I will preface by saying that I am very money driven. I grew up poor in an immigrant family and so for me, wealth is very important. I am very ambitious and as such I have what many would consider a high flying career.

When I met dp, he had similar ambitions. He wanted to go into a niche role which is very coveted and extremely well paid. He’s applied numerous times for these jobs but never gets one. This is down to him being potentially naive and over confident in his abilities. He doesn’t have the skill set required despite being very bright.

He has now found himself feeling defeated and heading down a career path doing something he doesn’t want to do. He has decent hours and the pay is good but not maybe 1/5th of what I thought he would be earning.

So now we are at a point where I significantly out earn him. To buy a good flat in a desirable bit of London (central) you need two excellent salaries not one. So I feel that I won’t achieve what I work so hard to get. He has started joking that it’s fine that he can be a stay at home dad or I can look after him, but even when he does have free time, I end up cooking and cleaning for him. I do all of his laundry for example.

OP posts:
slore · 19/04/2024 03:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Ilovecleaning · 19/04/2024 04:20

The relationship has run its course.and you have outgrown your partner.
You both started off on the same path but he’s strayed off it. You are seeing his weaknesses such as lacking certain skills and his tendency to overestimate himself.
Time to end this, sadly.

Sweden99 · 19/04/2024 06:32

The OP is getting the sort of reaction from many posters that I would expect from a forum of bitter misogynists.

catonmyback · 19/04/2024 06:37

How far into your careers are you both?

Can't be that far. You both 20
Something

Things change. People progress and develop at different times

I found my career in my early 30s

RampantIvy · 19/04/2024 06:39

I class myself as a "winner"
I'm not attractive or rich or a high flyer.

What I am is happy - in a job I love that gives me a lot of job satisfaction. It isn't well paid but I feel valued by my boss and workmates.

I have been married to my soul mate for over 40 years, and while we aren't wealthy we aren't poor either. We live in a nice house that we own outright.

I have friends that never pull stunts like the ones I read about on here. I get on with my neighbours and workmates.

Oh, and DH pulls his weight around the house 😁

RampantIvy · 19/04/2024 06:44

Sweden99 · 19/04/2024 06:32

The OP is getting the sort of reaction from many posters that I would expect from a forum of bitter misogynists.

Absolutely not true in my case. Her DH's lack of ambition and unwillingness to pull his weight in the house are unattractive traits that would put me off, but her very materialistic attitude is also unattractive.

Akamai · 19/04/2024 06:50

QueenOfTheLabyrinth · 19/04/2024 02:49

No I did not piss all over OP’s hard work & neither was I “bringing her down” for what she’s achieved either.

I made several different points:

  • First off all I am also the child of immigrants who grew up in abject poverty so I get where OP is coming from; my own poor upbringing was also what drove me but maybe you missed that bit.
  • I told OP what I achieved - ON MY OWN - to illustrate that it’s possible for her to get there on her own too albeit it may take longer hence me mentioning the age I was & fully acknowledging she may want to get there quicker.
  • The point of mentioning that it was drummed into me to only rely on myself was because at the end of the day, the only person you can fully control is yourself. If you are waiting or relying on someone else to bring you happiness then there’s a good chance you may have a lifetime of misery ahead of you. I wasn’t saying it to make out like I’m better than OP, I was saying it because it’s hard cold reality & what I consider good advice.

THEN ON A COMPLETELY SEPARATE & UNRELATED NOTE TO THE POINTS MADE ABOVE:

  • I took issue with OP making out that she somehow “deserves” / has an “entitlement” to certain things just because she works hard because the implication is that those who don’t reach the same heights can’t or won’t be working as hard as her and therefore are less deserving. That doesn’t mean I’m in anyway bashing OP for her hard work or what she’s achieved, my comments were in relation to her attitude (which other posters picked up on so it wasn’t just me) & nothing at all to do with her accomplishments hence why you’re conflating the different things I said. I’m all for celebrating women who excel & no I don’t think it’s big headed to be proud of one’s achievements (hence me mentioning my own success) but I do take offence to inferences that if you’re not “successful” it’s because you’re somehow lacking. This is because the hardest fucking workers I’ve ever met are my immigrant parents who worked their fingers to the bone yet for the majority of their lives didn’t have two beans to rub together.
  • My point about luck is that life is not a meritocracy (although I wish it was). Of course hard work is important but luck plays a major part in success as well & to deny that is at best naive & at worst arrogant / disingenuous. For example, you do realise that luck can be as simple as just being born bright enough to achieve academically right? You can be the hardest fucking worker in the world but if you don’t have an aptitude for academia then you probably won’t get past an undergrad. Also, if OP’s relying on a partner to help her achieve her dream then luck will play a big part, won’t it? Luck will be whether she meets a guy who has the same goals as her or the actual talent to pull it off or who won’t develop a chronic illness / disability or who won’t run off with another woman etc. All that is luck & in no way a reflection on how hard OP works.
  • I was in no way saying my success is down to my “philosophy” about only relying on myself & OP’s career is ONLY a matter of luck because of course it’s not. I’m only saying it’s important to acknowledge both. With regards to myself, I was actually making the complete opposite point to what you accuse me of hence why I said the hardest job I’ve ever had was a minimum wage job in care & not the job that ultimately made me my money. Yes I worked damn hard but so do millions of people everyday; I have no problem acknowledging that a factor to my success was that I also had luck on my side (born naturally academic, right idea at the right time etc). I honestly don’t know why people get so damn touchy when someone mentions luck or privilege playing a part in success, it’s like they think acknowledging it somehow diminishes their or others hard work or skills / talent; both things can be true at the same time.
Edited

First off all I am also the child of immigrants who grew up in abject poverty so I get where OP is coming from; my own poor upbringing was also what drove me but maybe you missed that bit.

No, I didn’t miss it, I’m also the child of poor immigrants, but it doesn’t give me the right to demean other women who take pride in succeeding.

I told OP what I achieved - ON MY OWN

But OP has also achieved her success ON HER OWN. Why are your achievements more deserving of respect than OP’s? She now wants a partner who matches her in ambition, what’s wrong with that?

I took issue with OP making out that she somehow “deserves” / has an “entitlement” to certain things just because she works hard because the implication is that those who don’t reach the same heights can’t or won’t be working as hard as her and therefore are less deserving.

That’s bullshit and you know it. Literally all she said was ‘So I feel that I won’t achieve what I work so hard to get.’ She said none of what you’ve inferred. If you took from that that the OP is entitled then that reveals your own misogyny. She has not implied that others who aren’t as successful as her don’t work as hard.

That doesn’t mean I’m in anyway bashing OP for her hard work or what she’s achieved, my comments were in relation to her attitude (which other posters picked up on so it wasn’t just me

Stop hiding behind other people. You were needlessly judgemental and rude about OP’s success and the fact that she dared say she worked for it.

I honestly don’t know why people get so damn touchy when someone mentions luck or privilege playing a part in success, it’s like they think acknowledging it somehow diminishes their or others hard work or skills / talent; both things can be true at the same time.

Are you for real?! You’re the one getting touchy with OP for merely saying she’s worrying she won’t achieve what she worked hard for. She’s the daughter of poor immigrants, you talk to her as if she is Kate Middleton! You’ve extrapolated a whole load of crap from OP’s one post.

Akamai · 19/04/2024 06:53

RampantIvy · 19/04/2024 06:44

Absolutely not true in my case. Her DH's lack of ambition and unwillingness to pull his weight in the house are unattractive traits that would put me off, but her very materialistic attitude is also unattractive.

It’s not materialistic to be ambitious and not want to bankroll a deadbeat who doesn’t pull his weight at home.

If a man talked about his goals in life, you would admire him. When a woman does it you label her materialistic. You are dripping in misogyny and refuse to see it.

LondonFox · 19/04/2024 07:30

jefofmon · 18/04/2024 22:10

@LondonFox My point is that men will often support their female partners to do what they want whether that is to stay home or retrain or whatever as long as its affordable, it appears somewhat true to me that women are far less likely to do that, perhaps if its a short term thing where the man will drastically improve his income i.e. getting a qualification or training.

I wanted to move back to Ireland as well I just didn't want to take a job or be an employee if I did.

I agree that very high earning men will probably have different priorities to what the woman they are with makes and will probably want younger.

Edited

Some men will support their partners to stay at home. All men who do that benefot from cooking, cleaning and free childcare.

In a lot of cases when man is at home due to unemployment or has lower earning job with more free time, woman will still do majority of house and child related chores (like OP).
I can see why women do not want to facilitate that lifestyle.

And for every man that is happy to support a SAHM there is one expecting women to pay for all child related expenses including childcare as it is "her decision to work", and one expectong SAHM to go straight to sharing bills 50:50 although she was out of career for a decade to care for children.

RampantIvy · 19/04/2024 07:35

Akamai · 19/04/2024 06:53

It’s not materialistic to be ambitious and not want to bankroll a deadbeat who doesn’t pull his weight at home.

If a man talked about his goals in life, you would admire him. When a woman does it you label her materialistic. You are dripping in misogyny and refuse to see it.

Nope

Akamai · 19/04/2024 07:36

👍

Vod · 19/04/2024 07:52

I wouldn't advise any young woman to stay in a relationship where she's already taking such a disproportionate share of the housework. Men like that tend to get worse as they age, not better, and if they want DC it'll be awful. If he can't even pull his weight when it's just two adults in a flat, run.

Mirabai · 19/04/2024 07:57

Akamai · 19/04/2024 06:53

It’s not materialistic to be ambitious and not want to bankroll a deadbeat who doesn’t pull his weight at home.

If a man talked about his goals in life, you would admire him. When a woman does it you label her materialistic. You are dripping in misogyny and refuse to see it.

Yep.

VeterinaryCareAssistant · 19/04/2024 08:04

Dartmoorcheffy · 18/04/2024 14:40

I don't find materialistic people at all attractive. Other than his earning potential, what other things attracted you to him?

Being wealthy really isn't the most important thing in life. Being healthy, happy and having a home (not necessarily a show house) are far more valuable to me.

Agree with this.

Mirabai · 19/04/2024 08:12

VeterinaryCareAssistant · 19/04/2024 08:04

Agree with this.

The thread’s not about what other MN posters find attractive, it’s about what appeals to the OP.

dottiedodah · 19/04/2024 08:12

I think you have outgrown him tbh. Jobs are hard to get esp well paid ones .there is a lot of competition. He probably picks up on how you feel and is feeling under pressure. Going forward you say you don't want a sahd so you may have to think long and hard about your relationship and if its for you

Midnightrunners · 19/04/2024 08:17

He deserves better.

Itsonlymashadow · 19/04/2024 08:20

Midnightrunners · 19/04/2024 08:17

He deserves better.

How do you know that?

Sweden99 · 19/04/2024 08:21

If you go on male dominated forums and take them at face value, you would think they were all top global experts in finance, global matters of state and sport who are all brave, principled and intellectual.
On Mumsnet, if we take posters at face value, they are all working full time, juggling kids and they doing the bulk of the housework, while being selfless wives always putting their children and husbands first.

C1N1C · 19/04/2024 08:27

It's funny how the posts are pretty much split down the middle...

He's a cocklodger because he earns less

You're materialistic because you want him to earn more

Anyway, the OP hasn't returned so...

RampantIvy · 19/04/2024 08:40

He's a cocklodger because he earns less

IMO he's a cocklodger because he doesn't pull his weight in the house and lacks ambition.

Not being able to match his partner's earnings doesn't necessarily make him a cocklodger.

I have never been able to match DH's earnings because he has a niche specialism (engineering consultant) that people will pay £££ for, and that has taken him all over the world. My skills just aren't as well paid as his.

However, we have both been ambitious and hard working, and both have pulled our weight when bringing DD up and with household stuff.

NonPlayerCharacter · 19/04/2024 08:42

Sweden99 · 19/04/2024 08:21

If you go on male dominated forums and take them at face value, you would think they were all top global experts in finance, global matters of state and sport who are all brave, principled and intellectual.
On Mumsnet, if we take posters at face value, they are all working full time, juggling kids and they doing the bulk of the housework, while being selfless wives always putting their children and husbands first.

you would think they were all top global experts in finance, global matters of state and sport who are all brave, principled and intellectual.

In the ones I've been on, they were pretty open about not being brave, principled and intellectual.

On Mumsnet, if we take posters at face value, they are all working full time, juggling kids and they doing the bulk of the housework, while being selfless wives always putting their children and husbands first.

If you don't think it's a very common reality for many women to be working full time while still doing the bulk of the shitwork and deprioritising themselves , well....would you like to buy a bridge?

RampantIvy · 19/04/2024 08:47

you would think they were all top global experts in finance, global matters of state and sport who are all brave, principled and intellectual.

Are any top global experts in finance principled? Grin

theleafandnotthetree · 19/04/2024 09:12

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Agree completely. That poster makes me think of the girlfriend in Jerry Maguire played by Kelly Preston, she dumps him as soon as he stops being a 'winner'. It's a caricature to a point but I guess people like that walk amongst us.

Mirabai · 19/04/2024 09:15

IMO he's a cocklodger because he doesn't pull his weight in the house and lacks ambition.

That is the real issue here, the income aspect is a red herring imo.