Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Four children 1-14 years sharing room

331 replies

Parques · 18/03/2024 12:39

AIBU to think it's ridiculous and irresponsible that 4 children (same sex - male) aged from 1-14 are sharing a bedroom? There is a fifth child - a girl - who has her own room. There are no funds to extend/loft conversion etc. The children were all planned. No multiple births.

OP posts:
Needmorelego · 18/03/2024 12:47

As long as they all have a bed I don't see the problem.

Kalevala · 18/03/2024 12:57

As long as the room fits two bunk beds and the eldest has a space to study separate from where children are playing, it's fine.

SpringOfContentment · 18/03/2024 12:58

I think it's less than ideal, and not what id choose, but think ridiculous and irresponsible is a little excessive.
It's what the parents have chosen, so presumably they are happy with it.

Who are you in the situation? And why are you concerned?

jengachampion · 18/03/2024 13:00

It won't kill them. As long as they're happy with it, it's fine. Lots of people around the world making do with worse.

RampantIvy · 18/03/2024 13:00

It's what the parents have chosen, so presumably they are happy with it.

But are the children? The 14 year old will need somewhere quiet to study.

RedToothBrush · 18/03/2024 13:02

You assume there is the ability to make a choice to do something different.

skirtingboardz · 18/03/2024 13:02

Depends on the faking dynamics. How well the kids all get on, if they are happy with it.

As long as it's a happy home, does it really matter?

Rosindub · 18/03/2024 13:04

Many of us grew up sharing bedrooms with siblings and doing our homework at the kitchen table. If that is the biggest hardship these children ever face, they will be more fortunate than most children in the world.

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 18/03/2024 13:05

People grew up sharing bedrooms with more siblings than that and did fine in years gone by

as long as there is space for homework to be done and the likes it’s fine.

Cafelattes · 18/03/2024 13:07

It's not ideal but it will become increasingly common over the next generation as housing costs get further out of reach. Whether you agree or not there are plenty of families who won't limit their number of children on the basis of the number of bedrooms they can afford (bearing in mind that housing has increased disproportionately, so they might afford other essentials comfortably, but not additional rooms).

Remember it's only in recent times that it became the norm for all children to have their own room,historically this was never the case.

StopStartStop · 18/03/2024 13:08

Fourteen is puberty or post-puberty. Need their own space. Not just for studying.

Comedycook · 18/03/2024 13:10

Five children is a ridiculous number to have, especially if you don't have the space. Yanbu.

Comedycook · 18/03/2024 13:10

RedToothBrush · 18/03/2024 13:02

You assume there is the ability to make a choice to do something different.

The choice was to not have five kids. Loads of people make that choice.

Comedycook · 18/03/2024 13:11

Is the eldest boy is 14 and the youngest is 1...that's means in four years an 18 year old will be sharing a room with a five year old. Still, I suppose the poor sod will have a good incentive to move out asap.

MallorcaNights · 18/03/2024 13:12

I think it’s incredibly selfish and irresponsible

Whatevershallidowithmylife · 18/03/2024 13:13

I shared with my two sisters until we left home. My DB had his own room. We had one bathroom. Shocking 🙄

MrsApplepants · 18/03/2024 13:14

Yes selfish and irresponsible parents

Youcannotbeseriousreally · 18/03/2024 13:14

Sounds absolutely horrific.

thepastinsidethepresent · 18/03/2024 13:15

I'd have hated that growing up. Kids' need for a space of their own grows as they do. I think don't have 5 kids if you can't afford adequate bedroom arrangements.

LenaLamont · 18/03/2024 13:16

Not your business.

I prefer to assume people are doing the best they can until proven otherwise. If that’s the situation the family find themselves in, I hope they can make it work.

MsPloddingBottom · 18/03/2024 13:16

I'm all for people being able to have a family regardless of income. Lots of us don't have children in perfect circumstances

Nonetheless!

This is ridiculous. They chose, 5 times, to plan a baby. They didn't need this many kids with only two bedrooms. Shit for the children and selfish. They could have still had three children- a good size family- but they decided to keep having more. Why????

RedToothBrush · 18/03/2024 13:17

Comedycook · 18/03/2024 13:10

The choice was to not have five kids. Loads of people make that choice.

That ship has sailed.

GivingOutYards · 18/03/2024 13:17

My self and my husband grew up like this, it was fine!

BrieAndChilli · 18/03/2024 13:18

i think that 5 kids in a 3 bed with no money available to increase space means that there are probably other things that the kids are missing out on - friends staying over, peace and quiet to do homework, extra curricular activities etc.
My 2 boys shared a room until they were 13 and 10. by then it was getting really obvious that the older one needed his own space for studying and going to bed a little later (and we had already made a little area in the study for him to use) Since we moved and they now have their own rooms things are much better for everyone.

AlexaPlaySomeHappyHardcore · 18/03/2024 13:19

It’s not what I would choose for my family, overcrowded homes are becoming more common, or will be.

Are the children having the rest of their needs met? Adequate beds, food, clothing etc? Are they clean? Are their emotional needs being met?