Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Just told DH I will Divorce him over a fucking wedding Part two

716 replies

KeenHiker · 04/03/2024 09:52

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5018658-just-told-dh-i-will-divorce-him-over-a-fucking-wedding

I can’t believe the responses that I had.

Essentially I am going to that wedding so it won’t backfire on me and then as people have suggested reassess when everything has calmed down after Easter.

I am never going to look at MiL in the same light as she clearly thinks my daughter is an impediment to her own granddaughter.

Just told DH I will divorce him over a fucking wedding | Mumsnet

This is my first post. I think my head’s going to explode. BiL has shown no interest whatsoever in my daughters, not my eldest who isn’t my husband’...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5018658-just-told-dh-i-will-divorce-him-over-a-fucking-wedding

OP posts:
sunglassesonthetable · 08/03/2024 10:45

And tbh she wouldn't be taking you very seriously after that @Justkeeepswimming .

Justkeeepswimming · 08/03/2024 10:46

@sunglassesonthetable

What are you wanting from me? Or others on here with your continual argumentative posts and derailing of the thread.

If you want the last word - you have it, the thread is dead - well done!

Scrumbleton · 08/03/2024 10:47

@HomeTheatreSystem has set out the ins and outs of this case very clearly and rationally. I urge the OP to read it and consider each point. Otherwise as I said in Part 1 she will be getting a divorce and eldest DD will be in an awful situation. As I also said a whole lot can change over time as relationships and financial situations evolve- it is a long time until youngest DD goes to secondary school and you don't know where the 2 girls will be academically at that point. I'd really not be incandescent about a hypothetical scenario that is years off. if you love your husband just calm down and do allow the youngest to have unaccompanied play dates and an occasional visit to MIL on her own- im sure eldest would love to have one on one mother daughter time

sunglassesonthetable · 08/03/2024 10:49

@Justkeeepswimming

You posted that shocking comment about OP.

Stand by it.

Justkeeepswimming · 08/03/2024 10:54

sunglassesonthetable · 08/03/2024 10:49

@Justkeeepswimming

You posted that shocking comment about OP.

Stand by it.

@sunglassesonthetable

I did and explained why in my response to you. You can take issue with it if you wish. But my opinion is that it is unreasonable to push someone else into spending 100s of thousands on a child they are not responsible for.

Are we done with the shockingly repetitive and argumentative posts?

Please can the thread move on and can you allow the discussion to progress.

sunglassesonthetable · 08/03/2024 11:01

Are we done with the shockingly repetitive and argumentative

You tell me? And have a look at how much you've posted.

And only agreeing allowed?

Please can the thread move on and can you allow the discussion to progress

So you can post more?

Honestly the arrogance.

WillYouPutYourCoatOn · 08/03/2024 17:10

Dear me. How an earth can you advise anyone to stay or not stay in any marriage on the basis of some paragraphs?

@sunglassesonthetable This seems to be a running theme to everything you have to say. Most people can read what's written and understand the underlying tone/circumstances. Reading between the lines so to speak.

You can't accept anything unless it's spelled out, black and white, to the letter, then take that as the only word on the matter.

When others can read the situation, you find it weirdly "hilarious" and many other words which also don't apply, because you can't/won't/don't.

It is very obvious to most people posting. But there you are arguing with each and every one of them "no no no that's your perception, you can't possibly know that." Whereas it's pretty obvious to most, given the information that you can see what's going on behind the scenes.

WillYouPutYourCoatOn · 08/03/2024 17:11

Justkeeepswimming · 08/03/2024 10:46

@sunglassesonthetable

What are you wanting from me? Or others on here with your continual argumentative posts and derailing of the thread.

If you want the last word - you have it, the thread is dead - well done!

I know, it's tedious isn't it.

sunglassesonthetable · 08/03/2024 17:28

It is very obvious to most people posting. But there you are arguing with each and every one of them "no no no that's your perception, you can't possibly know that." Whereas it's pretty obvious to most, given the information that you can see what's going on behind the scenes.

Really?

In that case there would be nothing but agreement as it was so obvious.

sunglassesonthetable · 08/03/2024 17:31

This seems to be a running theme to everything you have to say. Most people can read what's written and understand the underlying tone/circumstances. Reading between the lines so to speak.

Most posters would just agree. And no they don't.

But it suits your narrative that the way you see it is the way it is.

Simply don't agree.

You've pointed out how stupid some posters are ( in comparison to you I suppose ) You take it very hard that some don't agree.

sunglassesonthetable · 08/03/2024 17:32

I know, it's tedious isn't it.

Oh please stop huffing and puffing.

HollyKnight · 08/03/2024 17:41

Like I said in my deleted comment, threads always go this way when certain posters turn up.

sunglassesonthetable · 08/03/2024 17:46

Thanks Holly. It was mean enough to get deleted but 🤷‍♀️

VTown · 08/03/2024 18:07

Debate it all you want, but IMO, the OP probably shouldn't be going on a public message board to ask a bunch a strangers if she should be getting a divorce, and especially when she is only able to offer a few paragraphs of (sometimes confusing) details about the situation. And, yes, she over-reacted tremendously to what was obviously a myopic gaffe (wedding invite), not an evil plot, that was rectified as soon as it was made known. (I find it amusing that she went whining to her MIL about this but then turns around and calls her MIL out regarding "moaning" about wanting to see her DGD one-on-one.)

Honestly, it sounds like she is overly defensive about/protective of her eldest due to the circumstances with eldest's father/family. Hence the overblown emotions. I'm thinking maybe a pattern of behaviour? She should put her energies into making those relationships better or coming to terms with it (and stop calling people out every time she sees the smallest inequality, e.g., Easter eggs), rather than blowing up her marriage.

WillYouPutYourCoatOn · 08/03/2024 18:23

Aaaah, I didn't see that Holly. Gotcha

MargoEmbargo · 09/03/2024 17:30

Well op, what a ride, a simple question of a child being left out from an invite to a wedding along side the nuclear family, for what it's worth I think many agree with you on that point, it was unthoughtful of them, probably not intentional, but yes unthoughtful.
Your little girl at ten probably was upset at not being a flower girl, they don't understand the dynamics of only smaller children doing this. You could have managed this upset better if she had been invited along side of you but unfortunately they are insensitive people, probably not unknind intentionally just a bit ignorant and not thinking of her and you.

This episode has shone a light into the dynamics of your nuclear family and how future decisions may go, especially finanacially.
There is nothing you can do to even this out, his family will always favour their grandchild and even if you divorce this will not change.

Your influence will not extend in the future by inheritances, this family have purposely diverted and altered their wills to bypass you so your grandchild benefits and other siblings do not. It is not your money to decide what is fair in the future, you have been taken out of the eqausion, they would do this to their other children if they also remarried, it's what people with weath do, it is not exceptional, it is the norm.

I do think your anger comes from the fact your husband won't be the direct decendant of all the money but where there is money even first wives are bypassed becuase of the grandparents fear of death of sons/daughters and the 1st wives/husbands remarrying. It's very normal

Whether you fall out with them will make absolutely no difference to them and your child's inheritance, it will come to her eventally in one way or another. You said you went to private school yourself so maybe your parents have wealth, you don't say about the father's family's finances but this is life, you must have thought about these consequences when you met your current husband.
You will just have to ease your first daughter's feelings in the future, it was always a conversation that was going to be had, I think your anger is not just about the invite but the inequalities of your children's futures, you are transferring these feelings about the wedding to the wider issue of inheritance, that unfortunately is no ones fault, it's just life.

I do think some of the posters are thinking inheritance/property pass on, it would be cruel not to just pass on to the son and allow him to share his wealth with the new family, well some wealth can include more than property it can include money that will continue to generate after death, through products, publishing, copyrights etc.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread