Who is she setting a “powerful deterrent”to?
are other minor girls (children under16) really not going to get groomed becuase they’ll think “oh, I might end up like that women Begum?”
right, yep, that’s going to happen!
It will not stop terrorism, nor the manipulation of young minors by terrorist cell males . Literally they do not care the fall out on the women or children for that matter.
I do not condone what she did, but there’s a large male population in jail of ex British citizen terrorists that we don’t make examples of …becuase it’s a fucking waste of time. We put them on trial, lock them up until we can be very sure they’ll not terrorise anyone else
it is illegal under international law to make someone stateless . The reason these lawyers are appealing is the precedent THAT sets
I can only assume that there’s a lot of things in security files about her that we don’t know and are not being said, and the government wants to be rid of this “turbulent priest” without putting her on trial and making this for,Sri on public for security reasons. Not being conspiracist there, it just seems a very odd judgement that is bound to be appealed repeatedly given international law. Or the government is just stupid 🙄