Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to be fed up with homophobia on MN

204 replies

smittenkitten · 24/03/2008 13:33

today there was the thread about being 'uncomfortable' with a secondary school telling kids it's OK to be gay. a short while ago there was a post about someone being freaked out by two women kissing on a bus.

calling it being 'uncomfortable' is still homophobia. we wouldn't tolerate racism on here - imagine "i'm concerned that my DC's school wants to say it's OK to be black". the OP would be rightly slammed, but instead the queers on MN have to put up with people defending bigotry saying that people are entitled to have a POV etc.

Freedom of speech does not include the right to victimise and marginalise others for their race, religion, sexuality, age or other irrelevant attributes. I don't think its unreasonable to want MN to be a safe space where we don't have to deal with homophobia.

OP posts:
morningpaper · 24/03/2008 13:35

I think you are being unreasonable

There is homophobia in society and MN is just a reflection of that - although TBH homophobic posts on MN are very rare

The good thing about MN is that you get 1 post which is homophobia and 300 posts explaining why that person needs educating

I think it's a good thing

yurt1 · 24/03/2008 13:35

I think most people have been pretty openly shocked by the post about the secondary school lesson.

hercules1 · 24/03/2008 13:36

Actually freedom of speech means we can discuss these issues. What a dreadful place mumsnet would be if we weren't allowed to deal with homophobia and discuss racism etc.

yorkshirepudding · 24/03/2008 13:37

Message withdrawn

Wisteria · 24/03/2008 13:37

can't stand the word 'queers' personally......

yorkshirepudding · 24/03/2008 13:38

Message withdrawn

WanderingTrollegg · 24/03/2008 13:39

I'm all for freedom of speech. I disagree with the opinion of mner who was a bit uncomfortable with the school's talk, but if she's not allowed to express those views how can she ever change them, if she so chooses?

banning people from discussion isn't a good thing,imo.

havent' seen the kissing on a bus thread.

norkmaiden · 24/03/2008 13:39

Wisteria, I think words like 'queer' and 'camp' have been reclaimed by the gay community (in the way that 'black' has been reclaimed), so I'm not sure there's any need to be offended by it - ?

MotherFunk · 24/03/2008 13:40

Message withdrawn

UniversallyChallenged · 24/03/2008 13:41

why call them "queers" smittenkitten?

am confused by this as it seemed from your OP you dislike homophobia - then you use this word

Wisteria · 24/03/2008 13:42

possibly so nork - but I can't stand it! 'tis a personal thing and the gay members of my family also detest it so not all the gay community have reclaimed it clearly

MotherFunk · 24/03/2008 13:43

Message withdrawn

OverMyDeadBody · 24/03/2008 13:44

I agree with morningpaper.

MotherFunk · 24/03/2008 13:45

Message withdrawn

Aitch · 24/03/2008 13:45

oh fgs. i've danced the night away at Heaven and i'd still be a bit taken aback by blokes kissing on a bus (so, to be clear, despite the fact that i've seen them fucking in nightclubs). it doesn't mean anything other than it's an unusual sight.
i think the OP of the school post has taken a savage beating at the hands of a baying 'look i'm not a homophobe' mob and you all shouldn't be happy about that especially when the OP really didn't say anything that you wouldn't expect to be able to prick with a few well-chosen questions.
mn isn't like RL AT ALL, in RL people rarely get duffed up because of a comment like those, they're more likely to be agreed with. but let's never waste an opportunity to be pious, eh?

PABLOP · 24/03/2008 13:46

YABU, I agree with all of the posts on here, I was on the thread regarding schools and the vast majority disagreed with the op. here. I am neither racist or homophobic and think there are a lot of ignorant people in the world, however if these subjects are not debated a great number of people would remain ignorant. I have seen threads where the op has had her opinion changed completley after being educated.

OverMyDeadBody · 24/03/2008 13:46

That was from february!!

I wouldn't call two threads in two months worthy of getting 'fed up' about tbh. A very tiny minority of the monthly threads that occus here on MN.

norkmaiden · 24/03/2008 13:46

that's interesting to know Wist - maybe it's the difference between queer as adjective (eg queer theory) and queer as noun - the first seems more balanced than the second for sure.

Novicecamper · 24/03/2008 13:48

The original poster in that thread said - 'I don't want to come across as a Prude but I really don't want my DC's to witness this kind of behaviour whether the couple were heterosexual or gay.'

What's wrong with that? I don't want to see people full on snogging on a bus either, particularly with small children in tow. The use of the term 'this kind of behaviour' is a bit strange, but other than that, I think her post is reasonable. She isn't singling out gay people as far as I can see from that post.

KerryMum · 24/03/2008 13:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

OverMyDeadBody · 24/03/2008 13:50

ok = normal in my books km.

Novicecamper · 24/03/2008 13:51

Oops, thread moved on since I wrote that!

PABLOP · 24/03/2008 13:51

eewk I don't want to see anybody snogging in public, I couldn't give a monkeys what sex they are.

yorkshirepudding · 24/03/2008 13:51

Message withdrawn

yorkshirepudding · 24/03/2008 13:52

Message withdrawn