YANBU.
There's no point in Labour voters trying to use the 'they care more about women with their policies' - to them women are a mixed sex group with the most important women being the male ones. They can't even identify the group, never mind target policies at them, and they would like to arrest and charge women for stating factual reality that disadvantages and excludes them.
Labour would embrace this policy which already sees women from vulnerable groups including women of minority faiths and cultures, disabled women, homosexual women, abused and traumatised women, women with literacy barriers and who struggled to access education excluded from any women's resources so that men may have women's services focused primarily on them and the full freedom of choice of all the resources to best fit their self expression - Labour were supposed to be the champions of these oppressed groups and were once. They aren't now. Largely because they are full on in hock to extremist lobby groups.
I can choose between a party that is full on in favour of destroying women's rights and imprisoning those who protest, and in destroying child safeguarding, in the name of furthering male sexual freedoms and rights, or a party that is at least dragging it's feet and starting to talk openly about the need to ensure everyone's rights are met, and to say that sex matters when it comes to women's safety and child safeguarding. They are the only party doing this.
It's no good either saying all this happened on their watch: this political lobby took everyone in. Where were Labour on the opposition benches providing the balance and sense to the government of the time if they were more clear sighted and caring about the impact upon all other groups' equalities?