pussilinamorous yes that’s what I was trying to say.
I live in an area where lots of adults are in care or get care and a lot of that huge cost is passed onto the council taxpayer.
There are also a lot of families who keep having lots of children despite those children needing extra help.
Part of this cost is also passed onto the council tax payer.
I completed a survey where the council asked if I would be happy for my ct to increase by X % and I said no.
They then asked which services I would be happy to cut and I said those exact ones.
You keep having children, you pay for their extra needs eg taxis to and from school.
The disparity is those who live in ‘nice areas’ will either pay less or have much better services which they use.
Whilst some of us are paying for Sharron’s 4th child to be taxied to and from school whilst the father of that child earns more than I do but claims to live at a different address. Others are getting more buses from the street they live in at a very reasonable cost. Or a beautiful, clean park.
There are some things which the council cannot refuse to do and that is the issue.
As for the roads there should be a levey imposed on those who use artics. They are the ones destroying the roads where I live despite numerous signs telling them not to use these specific roads. Yet again why should the ct payer stump up the bill for this?
The trouble is the people who pay the most relatively don’t always get the most benefit.