I read something recently about more tax being taken based on property value than from wages which I think would be a fairer way to do it.
That could cause even more difficulty in recruiting to essential roles in areas of high house prices.
A teacher/nurse/police officer in the SE will get the same salary as one in the NE, because pay scales are national, but will have much higher housing costs than their NE colleague. If council tax was wholly based on property value, there would be an even bigger incentive for them to relocate to a cheaper area.
The obvious way of addressing that would be to have a housing costs supplement added to public sector salaries in high rent/house price areas, but people have been suggesting that since I started work in 1972 and it still hasn't happened.
Also, high property values are perceived as making people rich, but it actually makes them poor in the early years, when they're paying huge mortgages. When interest rates were high in the 80s, everyone with a mortgage was skint. Most of my friends were doing 2 jobs, and at one time I had 4.
It only makes you rich when you're in a position to release the capital locked up in your home. I'm past retirement age, but still working p/t. When I give that up, I will have to move away to a much cheaper area, because I only have a small occupational pension and it will barely cover the essentials. I looked into buying a flat here, but they all seem to have high service charges (all well in excess of £2k pa, which would be a big chunk of my net income) which kind of defeats the object.
I'll have to live on the capital I have left after moving and just hope I die before it runs out!