These threads have dominated my time for a few days. Useful though, and I think a lot of people approached this conversation with a good faith wish to understand things better. So I am going to go and get on with overdue work but wanted to share the below post that I put on another thread as I think it's important those who are "anti zionist" think about what the word might mean to other people
I don't have any connection to Israel, and I won't move there or even visit there. However, this is my view on the concept of zionism and the importance of Israel.
It is factual that Jews originate from the middle east and thus have just as much right to feel the area is their "homeland" as a Muslim does. Particularly those who never left the area.
I am an Arab. I am middle eastern. That drips off me in my accent, my appearance, my customs (of which I have many Arab ones). We eat Arab food, we speak Arab language, we feel deeply connected to our heritage. I am indigenous to this part of the world and I have a right to my connection to it.
Yet my people have been ethnically cleansed out of almost every place there. Libya, Iran, Syria, Yemen...almost nowhere has any of us left, and almost all these countries would not allow me to live there or to have rights as a citizen.
And before people say this is a result of Israel's existence, they have to consider the truth that before Israel's existence, Jewish people were largely allowed to live in the middle east but only with status as dhimmi.
The meaning of this varied depending on country and leader at the time, but it typically meant:
- being banned from government jobs
- being banned from living where we wanted
- paying extra taxes
- being unable to testify against a Muslim in court
- being unable to legally fraternise with or marry a Muslim
- having to defer to Muslims in the street as a mark of respect
- not being allowed weapons to defend myself
- sometimes having to wear distinctive clothing (like a yellow star)
So this really was apartheid, across the entire region. Jews (and others who were not Muslim) were not allowed to live in equality, and on top of those things they were subjected to frequent violence, fairly regular arbitrary murder, stripping of property, numerous pogroms and a very deep culture of antisemitism.
And we were being ethnically cleansed long before Israel existed. 5000 of us for example were killed once because a Jew looked at a Muslim's wife in the wrong way. So people cannot blame Israel's existence for the pervading attitude that we were not equals in our homeland.
I think I, and other Jews, have a right to ask to live in the land from whence we came - the land of our food and culture and history - without needing it to be on those terms.
So I will defend to the death the principle of zionism. That Jews - equally to Arabs- have a right to say "this is our home too and we want to live in it here" and for them to be able to do that in a way where their culture, beliefs and principles are respected.
Zionism is not a call for dominance or extermination of other people. It is a response to it. It was something that was necessary because other groups would not allow minorities to exist with equal status in Europe, Africa and the Middle East.
In Britain, I can live side by side with Christians, athiests, black people, Chinese people, Muslims, homosexuals, men, women - and for the large part it is fine. In the eyes of the law (and for the large part our cultural and acceptable norms) these people are equal under the eyes of the law.
That was not the case for Jews in 1947, or for hundreds of years before that either really, and is still not the case for Jews almost entirely across the middle east. Again, before saying "oh that is because of Israel" you only have to look at the Kurds to see this is not true.
I would defend to the death their right to "zionism" too. Certainly were they ever to be exported as slaves and later face genocide in Europe. The Yazidi people have lived through 74 genocides. This is a testament to the attitude to minorities in this region. It is their home. But they have lived through endless persecution, forced conversion, sexual slavery and they are forced to take contraception to stop them breeding!
So to me the moral principle is simple: if people cannot live together multiculturally and respect those of different cultures as equals with equal rights and freedoms - then they can't live together at all.
And all the people who stand on their high horse talking about freedom and oppression and human rights need to remember this.
Israel stands now - in my eyes - not as the "imperialist, colonialist" (which is a logical fallacy) or the iron fist over the poor and downtrodden. It stands as an isolated island on it's own within the middle east where someone has dared to say "no" to Islamic dominance. And there is no justifiable reason why Islam has to dominate this entire region and insist on rule over every inch of it. It is not solely theirs.
And they must accept that. And the international community must call on them to accept that with as much fortitude as they call on Freedom for the Palestinian people.
That principle is far more important that "this is my land and you took it" - particularly as a Jew, given that we, over any people, had "our" land changed, stolen, burned, taken time after time. To us the concept of arguing about it for 100 years is so alien.
It is not important to fight over where your grandparents lived 75 years ago. This is not an important moral principle. The important moral principle are:
Muslims and Arabs deserve to have homes, cultures, countries and lives in their homeland where they are free to express their beliefs and to have lives away from persecution.
And so do Jews.
And so do Kurds.
And everyone has to accept it, and work with everyone involved to make sure they can build the lives they all deserve.
Anti zionism is, to me, denying Jews the rights they really should have had the entire time: To live in the place they came from, free
No one denies that right to Palestinians. Or anyone else. So I question how someone can deny it to Jews and claim moral absolutes.
This is my view of zionism, which is something I thought over vary carefully for decades. I don't feel it's my "Holy Land". I don't think Jews necessarily couldn't live safely in Europe and America. I don't think who was there "first" is the be all and end all. I don't even think it's an "answer" to the horror of the Holocaust.
It is simply giving Jews the right they should have had the entire time: To live in the place they came from, free and in a manner of their choosing. And both Muslims and Jews should have this right in the middle east.