A favourite clip of the haters.
What's actually happening there is that the house belongs to an American Jewish Org, and Jacob is living there as a free tenant, in return for guarding over the property.
It's true that it isn't his house - he's only a tenant - and equally true that if he leaves another tenant will be found.
The Sheikh Jarrah issue is one that took over 40 years to filter through the courts until is was finally settled. Basically we're talking about properties that were owned by Jews fair and square, and who still have the deeds to prove ownership.
They lost access to their homes in 1948 when Jordan occupied East Jerusalem, and Arabs stole the land. After 1967, when Israel took back East Jerusalem, the original owners and inabitants of those properties petitioned the courts to have the Arab squatters evicted.
It was a decades-long process, during which many compromises were tried by the courts (including symbolic rent payments of mere pennies), but all agreements were rejected or broken by the squatters.
Eventually, the courts ruled that the squatters can be evicted and the homes returned to their original and rightful owners.
So while it's true that there are often several generations of Arabs living in those homes, they were squatters all along, whose 'tenancy' only started after the Jordanian occupation of 1948.
To add a further layer, some Jewish owners grew tired of going through the whole court procedure, decade after decade, so they sold their properties to an American Jewish Org.
What Sheikh Jarrah isn't and never had been, is ethinc cleansing of Arabs.
In fact, to accuse Israel of that, one would have to believe that sane people would try the equivalent of emptying a swimming pool with a teaspoon.