Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Russel has spoken

1000 replies

Whyismyfacealwaysdry · 22/09/2023 22:31

On Instagram, has anyone seen? What are your thoughts?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
Blueink · 27/09/2023 16:39

Fuck off Russel(l) 🤣

Jumpingthruhoops · 27/09/2023 16:39

IClaudine · 27/09/2023 16:20

Jumpingthruhoops if the harms from covid vaccines aren't being properly reported, where does Brand and those of his ilk get the data they use to base their claims on🧐?

Where? From the reports that are out there but that people have to dig for, that's where! Which is what I said about four days ago now.

The information IS out there, yes, but it is being largely suppressed to protect the desired narrative, as per the ban by Ofcom and others (at least in this country!) on MSM reporting on anything 'negative' about the pandemic response.

People like RB have done the digging, so they can bring this info to the masses - because, of course, not everybody has the ability to pick apart scientific data - and he's obviously ruffling feathers of various 'important people' with it.

That is all I have EVER suggested.

Blueink · 27/09/2023 16:43

Bingbangbongbash · 27/09/2023 09:42

I prefer to think of you as the ‘Women of Truth’. For an extraordinary, almost baroque price of just £49, I can welcome you into the inner coven where I promise you will bathe in the light of true understanding.

Don’t forget to like / subscribe 🥰

Hoping this isn’t another quote fail, but if it is Fuck off Russel(l) was quite pleasing as a stand alone (above) 🤣

Uncanny.

I also fancy going around chanting Bingbangboshbollocks for a bit, could be quite cathartic

WomblingTree86 · 27/09/2023 16:44

Jumpingthruhoops · 27/09/2023 16:26

But that's exactly the point I've been trying to make this entire thread... 'experts' won't necessarily give you the WHOLE truth, especially if that truth is unpalatable, ie, it highlights dangers or financial incentives.

Your electrician/plumber analogy is a great example... but I'd say THIS scenario might better describe what I'm referring to:
10 electricians come to your house and say to varying degrees that it needs rewiring or else it would blow up.
Nine of them are singing the praises of these pioneering new materials they're using - not revealing that these materials are only being promoted because of cash incentives attached to them and they have no real idea about the safety data.

The remaining one electrician then comes round; he is using the same new materials but openly tells you about the cash incentive and the question marks over safety. Do you dismiss him as a 'scaremongering conspiracy theorist' and go with the nine 'experts' who aren't being transparent just because that's the 'general consensus'?

Slightly tenuous, of course, but I'm hoping it might illustrate where I'm coming from.

What if it turned out the 10th electrician wasn't actually an electrician at all and they were making a fortune from providing the advice with no real knowledge of whether it was true? Would you automatically believe them over the nine who were qualified?

What if 10,000 electricians said one thing and official advice from people who were not profiting from advice agreed? Would you still go with the advice from someone who wasn't an electrician and was making huge profits from their advice?

WomblingTree86 · 27/09/2023 16:47

Jumpingthruhoops · 27/09/2023 16:39

Where? From the reports that are out there but that people have to dig for, that's where! Which is what I said about four days ago now.

The information IS out there, yes, but it is being largely suppressed to protect the desired narrative, as per the ban by Ofcom and others (at least in this country!) on MSM reporting on anything 'negative' about the pandemic response.

People like RB have done the digging, so they can bring this info to the masses - because, of course, not everybody has the ability to pick apart scientific data - and he's obviously ruffling feathers of various 'important people' with it.

That is all I have EVER suggested.

Why do you think RB has the ability to "dig" and evaluate evidence. Watch the video I posted...

Its5656 · 27/09/2023 16:51

@Bingbangbongbash

Absolutely this. Misinformation, from anti-vax to Covid to climate change denial has to be robustly challenged each and every time. It’s dangerous not to. Framing alternate views as equal in status or evidence cannot be left to stand.

Couldn't agree more.

Does anyone know who the elites are that are supposed to be so concerned that they've convinced multiple women to make false rape allegations?
Every time I've asked I've been told to google it.. Completely lost, do they mean the government or just the media?
Is that what people believe, the government/media have convinced women to break the law themselves by lying about rape?

TooBigForMyBoots · 27/09/2023 16:56

The elites out to get Russell Brand only exist in the minds of those groomed by him. Brand himself knows it's bullshit.

Bingbangbongbash · 27/09/2023 16:57

Blueink · 27/09/2023 16:43

Hoping this isn’t another quote fail, but if it is Fuck off Russel(l) was quite pleasing as a stand alone (above) 🤣

Uncanny.

I also fancy going around chanting Bingbangboshbollocks for a bit, could be quite cathartic

I couldn’t possibly condone such hero worship and adoration. I am but a humble truthsayer, standing firm against those that would obfuscate and mislead.

But do feel free to help get the truth out there by joining my Patreon, my child.

Bingbangbongbash · 27/09/2023 17:13

Its5656 · 27/09/2023 16:51

@Bingbangbongbash

Absolutely this. Misinformation, from anti-vax to Covid to climate change denial has to be robustly challenged each and every time. It’s dangerous not to. Framing alternate views as equal in status or evidence cannot be left to stand.

Couldn't agree more.

Does anyone know who the elites are that are supposed to be so concerned that they've convinced multiple women to make false rape allegations?
Every time I've asked I've been told to google it.. Completely lost, do they mean the government or just the media?
Is that what people believe, the government/media have convinced women to break the law themselves by lying about rape?

It’s actually really tricky to define the elite.

One definition would include someone with a lot of money - millionaires and the like.

But that would include Brand so it can’t be right.

Another definition would be someone who participates in mainstream media like TV, Hollywood movies etc.

But that would include Brand so it can’t be right, either.

Maybe it’s the people who use power and influence to misinform those with less power and influence, in order to make money from them?

Again, this can’t be right as it describes Brand perfectly.

I just don’t know.

Have you tried Googling it?

Blueink · 27/09/2023 17:13

Bingbangbongbash · 27/09/2023 16:57

I couldn’t possibly condone such hero worship and adoration. I am but a humble truthsayer, standing firm against those that would obfuscate and mislead.

But do feel free to help get the truth out there by joining my Patreon, my child.

Where do I sign?

Oh hold on, what were your qualifications again? I momentarily forgot myself as I was reaching for my wallet…

I hope you are neither Russel nor Russell and you shall return to the paper bag forever

Biochemist · 27/09/2023 17:38

But that's exactly the point I've been trying to make this entire thread... 'experts' won't necessarily give you the WHOLE truth, especially if that truth is unpalatable, ie, it highlights dangers or financial incentives.

@Jumpingthruhoops I have explained multiple times that there is robust, replicated research from multiple independent sources that demonstrates it was safer to be vaccinated than remain unvaccinated.

What you are suggesting is a conspiracy whereby tens of thousands of experts have been persauded to particpate in such a conspiracy. It's ridiculous.

I thought you would appreciate that is not literally just ten people (i.e. the ten electricians I used as an example)

I have also explained that it is not possible for a single person to do the same kind of evidence synthesise that is required when it comes to recommendation of health interventions - it requires a team of people, with relevant qualificaitons and expertise, working full time for weeks and months. I suggested that you read the summary documents, and you are welcome to follow any statements back to the original source if you have concerns.

I also pointed out that you can try following the claims people make back to the actual source. As is always the case - and I've done it dozens of times for fake claims about SARS-COV-2 vaccines - what is said does not reflect the actual document that they are claiming it is from.

All of this was ignored though, of course!

Biochemist · 27/09/2023 17:43

Jumpingthruhoops · 27/09/2023 16:39

Where? From the reports that are out there but that people have to dig for, that's where! Which is what I said about four days ago now.

The information IS out there, yes, but it is being largely suppressed to protect the desired narrative, as per the ban by Ofcom and others (at least in this country!) on MSM reporting on anything 'negative' about the pandemic response.

People like RB have done the digging, so they can bring this info to the masses - because, of course, not everybody has the ability to pick apart scientific data - and he's obviously ruffling feathers of various 'important people' with it.

That is all I have EVER suggested.

Again, this is more nonsense @Jumpingthruhoops

I regularly read papers that are using various methods to assess vaccine side effects - prevalence, mechanism etc.

The research is being done, it is being published and it's ridiculous to claim it's being suppressed.

Ironically, influencers don't seem to reference any this literature, they just pull other statistics out of context in an attempt to scare people from being vaccinated. This was ongoing long before the pandemic and is a lucrative industry. "Digging" my ass.

IClaudine · 27/09/2023 17:51

As per the ban by Ofcom can you point me towards the text of this ban, please, and the powers Ofcom use to implement it @Jumpingthruhoops

Bingbangbongbash · 27/09/2023 17:53

Blueink · 27/09/2023 17:13

Where do I sign?

Oh hold on, what were your qualifications again? I momentarily forgot myself as I was reaching for my wallet…

I hope you are neither Russel nor Russell and you shall return to the paper bag forever

Qualifications are a restriction placed on the truth by the small minded elite. Open your mind to the power of Bingbangbollocks.

All major credit cards accepted.

henlee · 27/09/2023 17:57

as per the ban by Ofcom and others (at least in this country!)

What does this even mean?! @Jumpingthruhoops

My research is never featured on the news, sometimes I struggle to get it published anywhere. It doesn't mean it's being suppressed and scientists have multiple avenues for result dissemination.

If you were claiming that anything negative about vaccines wasn't used in the most recent risk/benefit assessment to recommend to various groups you'd have a point, but that isn't the case.

IClaudine · 27/09/2023 18:06

@Jumpingthruhoops

Say I accept your assertion that the vaccines are doing serious harm to the population and that governments around the world are covering up the truth.

Why are they doing this? Why would they want to continue to do something that makes their citizens seriously unwell?

squareyedannie · 27/09/2023 18:08

BingBangBollox is a fking awesome name, btw.

bombastix · 27/09/2023 18:09

Similarly fluoridated water would affect our previous bodily fluids, Mandrake.

We know they want a war. We need to build tunnels and underground cities to beat them,

Bingbangbongbash · 27/09/2023 18:11

squareyedannie · 27/09/2023 18:08

BingBangBollox is a fking awesome name, btw.

You’re right. I think I might name change to it.

Now what shall my minions be named? Freeballs?

Bingbangbongbash · 27/09/2023 18:12

bombastix · 27/09/2023 18:09

Similarly fluoridated water would affect our previous bodily fluids, Mandrake.

We know they want a war. We need to build tunnels and underground cities to beat them,

Why are you sharing the plans???

squareyedannie · 27/09/2023 18:12

You should definitely own that name.

bombastix · 27/09/2023 18:12

Whoops

Its5656 · 27/09/2023 18:26

He's lost the plot, According to his latest post CCTV=Tyranny.
Absolute wanker.

Its5656 · 27/09/2023 18:30

Its5656 · 27/09/2023 18:26

He's lost the plot, According to his latest post CCTV=Tyranny.
Absolute wanker.

And I can imagine he'd prefer to live in a world where CCTV couldn't be used to prevent and capture evidence of a crime.
Sleazy rapist.

Bingbangbongbash · 27/09/2023 19:04

Jumpingthruhoops · 27/09/2023 16:26

But that's exactly the point I've been trying to make this entire thread... 'experts' won't necessarily give you the WHOLE truth, especially if that truth is unpalatable, ie, it highlights dangers or financial incentives.

Your electrician/plumber analogy is a great example... but I'd say THIS scenario might better describe what I'm referring to:
10 electricians come to your house and say to varying degrees that it needs rewiring or else it would blow up.
Nine of them are singing the praises of these pioneering new materials they're using - not revealing that these materials are only being promoted because of cash incentives attached to them and they have no real idea about the safety data.

The remaining one electrician then comes round; he is using the same new materials but openly tells you about the cash incentive and the question marks over safety. Do you dismiss him as a 'scaremongering conspiracy theorist' and go with the nine 'experts' who aren't being transparent just because that's the 'general consensus'?

Slightly tenuous, of course, but I'm hoping it might illustrate where I'm coming from.

It’s worth noting the significant difference in how ‘big pharma’ operates in the UK, which does not allow direct marketing to patients, and in the USA, where it is.

In the UK, most drugs are bought through the NHS’ own acquisition scheme, which has robust procurement protocols involving efficacy standards and value for money calculations.

It’s not a perfect system, but I fail to see where the electrician analogy fits.

There’s a huge amount wrong with the American medical system, which is why it’s particularly ironic the common myth peddlers like Tucker Carlson / Fox News are so against ‘socialised’ medicine as they call our NHS. If there was centralised procurement and a less direct link between salespeople and those administrating the drugs, the financial incentives would be obsolete.

With regard the vaccine roll out, one conspiracy theory is that it was a way for Pfizer et al to make tons of cash - conveniently ignoring the fact that much more cash would be made by ‘Big Pharma’ and related bodies by mass, long, expensive hospital treatments by unvaccinated people getting Covid. Plus all the juicy profits from long covid, rehab etc. Comparatively, the vaccines are cheap to manufacture.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread