If mum never gets a break, it’s DAD’s fault. -- fitzwilliamdarcy
Absolutely right.
First rule of misogyny: women are responsible for what men (don't) do.
No one wants them [SEND children]. They hate themselves as well because they know no one wants them. -- DailySnooze
Can confirm. Even without the stigma of a diagnostic label, I was the "weirdo" that few, if any, kids want to be around. Bullying, even sexual assault. Autistic girls are so vulnerable to sexual abuse and assault because we can't "read" other people to detect a predator before they strike. It's lonely and terrifying when the only people who want you around are sexual predators. I couldn't figure out why people didn't want me unless it was to hurt me. I blamed myself. If my suicide attempt had gone to plan, I wouldn't have seen my sixteenth birthday. (Source: I am a SEND adult (autism).)
If the OP has posted that her friend had a son who is epileptic and would need close supervision in the pool to keep him safe, but one family didn't want him to come behave he'd once had a seizure and kicked their daughter, I wonder if there would be more sympathy for both child and parent. -- DysmalRadius
Quite. For starters, no one would even dream of accusing the child of being naughty nor the parent of bad parenting. No one would suggest that the seizures could be avoided by "consequences" or "boundaries". There would be a recognition that triggers needed to be avoided and that some activities aren't suitable for the child. The practicalities would still be discussed, but without the subtext that the parent isn't trying hard enough.
It's not an unfair comparison at all: ADHD, autism, and epilepsy are all neurological conditions.
It's still not in any way reasonable of me to expect my able-bodied friends to spend their money and annual leave on a holiday that fits within the very narrow boundaries of my physical abilities. -- ItsNotRocketSalad
If there's a whole friendship group, and they do things together as a group of friends, it's not very friendly for them to decide to omit one friend from what would otherwise be a full group because that person's disabilities are inconvenient. They can go hiking or what-have-you outside of the friendship group to use their annual leave. A "second year housemates do the Catskills" holiday isn't the same as a "second year housemates, apart from Eric 'cos he's in a wheelchair, do the Catskills" holiday.
I don't believe it's SEN, and he's not even diagnosed with anything per OP -- FelisCatus0
A child isn't put on the referral pathway for no reason. It took a suicide attempt for me to get a CAMHS referral, and then there was a waiting list of around six months, which is just what a suicidal child in her GCSE exam year needs 😒 I'm reliably informed that waiting lists for CAMHS have got longer since then.
I was diagnosed autistic in my forties. Does that mean that I wasn't autistic before that? Would it have been reasonable for someone to say of me and my behaviour "I don't believe it's SEN, and she's not even diagnosed with anything"?
the genuinely most sad reality here is that a complete discussion in a large group of "friends" has occurred along with this thread, all while this parent is in the dark. -- DoubleShotEspresso
Hear hear. The "friends" are discussing decisions behind her back when she should be involved. They've made a clique within the friendship group and she's not in it. In their eyes, she and her son are burdens.
His father doesn't want him. His mother's friends don't want him. And there will be far more people who don't want him. My heart goes out to the poor boy.