So two opinion pieces and two small sample studies from the Americas that have found only a weak association. No correlation and no causation. No comparison to historic rates of violence whatsoever.
Did you expect me to send you hundreds of links? To sift through everything out there to present to you, here on mumsnet on a Saturday morning? Would you have preferred I write a review article, just for you? Cop on now.
Also, I saw your comment about how you "travelled the world" and only ever asked random men for help in remote areas, how you run alone at night, how you manage to pick only amazing and godly men to be around you. It reads like a fantasy novel blurb, written by men's rights activists. If you did all those things, you're bloody lucky you survived. I work in a large poor country for a few months every year in very rural areas (field work), and the safety rules for females especially are extremely strict, because in these areas women and girls go missing all the time. Almost all the time we make sure that there are men and women working together, but I remember once I was working with three female students, we had no men with us, and I was absolutely terrified every time I heard a car coming down the road, because I knew that I could not defend myself or my students if any of the men got an idea to do anything to us. I will never forget that. I wouldn't let any of the girls go off a little way into the bushes to pee.
It's great that you have no fear and have lived a magical life, and somehow have this supernatural ability to know that the men around you are all good ones who won't hurt you, but it really reads very condescendingly when you say "you must have chosen to have bad men around you so it's your own fault".
Out of curiosity, how would you have avoided this man's seemingly random attack in Bavaria? Would you just have assumed he was safe like every other man you've laid eyes on? Maybe if you had been there he wouldn't have done it, because men don't do bad things when you're around?