Who are you to say what is necessary?
That's like saying: "He was caught with his hands in the till/down someone's pants/clutching a glass of wine at a No 10 party during lockdown. but let's wait for the police investigation/Sue Gray's report/draw a line under it and move on."
Would you agree that was a good thing? Perhaps you would, but I wouldn't.
I don't care whether you're GC. I am too. But I want the follow up on this story. It has been legitimately done. Luna is flying below radar but the Daily Mail have approached Luna's dad, who has declined to comment as it his right. I would do that too if I identified as Luna's dad.
The comments from Luna's neighbours and former school friends paint a picture of someone who is a little challenging and perhaps not suited to a customer-facing role.
Again, fine. Luna can talk to a journalist from a more sympathetic outlet if he wants. I'm sure he will be able to find one if he looks hard enough. In fact, there will be many people banging on his door to get his side. Now he has lost his job, he has plenty of time to do it.