Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To hate people using the word 'myself' instead of just 'me'?

227 replies

blackrabbitwhiterabbit · 11/05/2023 11:52

There's just no need. It should be 'my friend and I'...shouldn't it? Not 'myself and my friend.'

First world 🌎 problems, I know. 😂

OP posts:
JenniferBarkley · 13/05/2023 09:44

I'm Irish and I think the Irish use of myself/yourself is more casual and informal than what's being discussed here, which is people using myself or yourself instead of I/me/you in an effort to sound more formal.

PedantScorner · 13/05/2023 11:04

@JenniferBarkley , it's probably acceptable as patois. I wouldn't recommend using it in e-mails.

JenniferBarkley · 13/05/2023 11:56

Yeah exactly @PedantScorner , you wouldn't see it used formally. Whereas other elements of English we use like gotten, haitch etc are acceptable formally but regularly criticised on here.

NowZeusHasLainWithLeda · 13/05/2023 14:54

CharlottenBerg · 13/05/2023 08:41

This 'misuse' has a history going back centuries. Some grammar studies seem to show that in current usage while the rule for fewer stands, the word less is used more fluidly. The comparative less is used with both countable and uncountable nouns in some informal discourse environments and in most dialects of English. The Cambridge Guide to English Usage says that the "pressure to substitute fewer for less seems to have developed out of all proportion to the ambiguity it may provide in noun phrases like less promising results". It describes conformance with this pressure as a shibboleth and the choice "between the more formal fewer and the more spontaneous less" as a stylistic choice. I have to say that I agree with that, much as it used to annoy me.

@CharlottenBerg don't know if you were around on Pedants' Corner when it was a nice place to discuss language quirks rather than a nasty, snooty "I've had to come over here to tell you about the poster who has just written..." that it's become, but there's a very interesting thread where people who know an awful lot more about language than me (and the grumpy customers who made Tesco change their NOT wrong sign) about why the less/fewer distinction is much more nuanced than less= uncountable, fewer= countable, which seems to be where the self-styled pedants' knowledge of grammar begins and ends.

Nanny0gg · 13/05/2023 14:57

Noorandapples · 11/05/2023 12:01

Ooh my partner says this and I hate it, he also says "whom" incorrectly a lot. But I have to seethe quietly because I bet I say annoying things too!

It's not just annoying. It's grammatically incorrect, makes no sense and makes the speaker sound a) pretentious and b) stupid.

(My opinion and I'm sticking to it)

I am horrified by the number of well-educated people who have started using it too.

You would be doing him a favour to point out that it's wrong.

Nanny0gg · 13/05/2023 14:59

JenniferBarkley · 11/05/2023 18:58

Nuffink, fanks and fort are all accent.

We was is informal usage in many dialects.

No, they're not. They're poor English. And I am originally from East London. It's not compulsory to speak like that

Nanny0gg · 13/05/2023 15:03

LakieLady · 12/05/2023 11:02

I've worked very hard on controlling my inner SPAG nazi, but incorrect use of the reflexive pronoun really sets my teeth on edge.

I've learned to live with people saying/writing "less" when it should be "fewer", and "different to", I can even tolerate the Oxford comma, but this myself/yourself business is something up with which I will not put.

Not to mention 'number' and 'amount'...

Nanny0gg · 13/05/2023 15:07

Diorama1 · 12/05/2023 11:58

I know I make this mistake frequently. I have tried to understand when to use me, myself and I correctly but I cant get my head around it. I am educated to masters level and have a professional qualification but honestly this stumps me (or I/myself!!). Can someone explain it in clear language and not use words like nominative, reflexive etc because that is not clear language :)?

Common examples of where I stuggle are:
when I am giving a list of people that attended a meeting and I am on that list, is it: myself, John, Mary, etc or John, Mary and me/I?
Please contact John and me/ myself and John?
Mary and I are going for coffee, myself and Mary are going for coffee.

I hate when I am speaking and this comes up as I know I always pause to consider which is correct and I am probably getting it wrong.

'myself, John, Mary, etc or John, Mary and me/I?'

Take everyone else out of the sentence
Would you say 'Me attended the meeting' 'I' or 'Myself' (hint: it's never 'myself'!)

You would say 'I' attended... so then put it back with everyone else, usually at the end.' John, Mary and I...'

Does that make sense?

Nanny0gg · 13/05/2023 15:14

CharlottenBerg · 12/05/2023 21:58

Yes. Not a tenable position, I know. I think it's that double 'm' - it looks sort of inelegant.

Another one I hate...Angry

(I clearly need to get out more!)

For me, it is actually an age thing.

I grew up reading beautifully written books from decades earlier (E. Nesbit, LM Montgomery, PL Travers etc) so what I read was correct English. Even Enid Blyton!
Newsreaders and presenters were beautifully spoken. Newspapers were all broadsheets and were rigorously edited (even what are now Red Tops) and whilst things getting slightly less posh was a good thing it's gone far too far in the other direction imo

Nanny0gg · 13/05/2023 15:16

Abcdefgh1234 · 13/05/2023 00:09

Personally NO. English is my 3rd language. I can speak english, write in english but sometimes makes grammatical error. But yes i can speak 3 languages. What makes me annoyed is people who speak english tend to get annoyed with immigrant who make grammatical error while themselves not even bilingual.

I tend to find that people who speak English as a 2nd or 3rd language speak it far better than most native speakers because they tend to be grounded in the grammar

Nanny0gg · 13/05/2023 15:18

JenniferBarkley · 13/05/2023 09:44

I'm Irish and I think the Irish use of myself/yourself is more casual and informal than what's being discussed here, which is people using myself or yourself instead of I/me/you in an effort to sound more formal.

You're right.
And when you listen it really is just part of dialect in that case

JenniferBarkley · 13/05/2023 15:18

Nanny0gg · 13/05/2023 14:59

No, they're not. They're poor English. And I am originally from East London. It's not compulsory to speak like that

It's not compulsory to use any accent.

I'm Irish but can pronounce my th's perfectly well (and in truth don't love accents which don't). That doesn't mean that Irish people who pronounce th the way I say t or d are wrong. We just have different accents.

JenniferBarkley · 13/05/2023 15:20

Newsreaders and presenters were beautifully spoken.

Beautifully spoken is subjective. I enjoy hearing a wide range of accents on TV. And think it's far more important that reporting is thoughtful and accurate than in a particular accent.

CharlottenBerg · 13/05/2023 15:28

Nanny0gg · 13/05/2023 15:14

Another one I hate...Angry

(I clearly need to get out more!)

For me, it is actually an age thing.

I grew up reading beautifully written books from decades earlier (E. Nesbit, LM Montgomery, PL Travers etc) so what I read was correct English. Even Enid Blyton!
Newsreaders and presenters were beautifully spoken. Newspapers were all broadsheets and were rigorously edited (even what are now Red Tops) and whilst things getting slightly less posh was a good thing it's gone far too far in the other direction imo

Two things that grind my wheels are (mainly tabloid) newspapers and e.g. the 'local' newspaper sites run by the Reach Group ('Somewhere Live') using 'mum' and (especially) 'nan' when they mean 'mother' and 'grandmother'. I don;t meen in direct speech. They don't yet have 'sis', 'bro', or 'grampy' yet, but maybe it's only a matter of time.

CharlottenBerg · 13/05/2023 15:31

JenniferBarkley · 13/05/2023 15:20

Newsreaders and presenters were beautifully spoken.

Beautifully spoken is subjective. I enjoy hearing a wide range of accents on TV. And think it's far more important that reporting is thoughtful and accurate than in a particular accent.

Everyone used to say I was 'well spoken' as a youngster. Maybe it came from getting a free place at Alleyn's. It used to embarrass me, as if I was perceived to be something I am not, but I've learned to live with it, and it taught me not to judge people by their accents (well, except the characters on Eastenders).

PippinStar · 13/05/2023 16:05

salamithumbs · 11/05/2023 16:31

I was thinking this, it seems so common in Ireland that it would never strike me as weird (and people even use himself/herself, as in 'myself and himself are going on holiday next week'). Never really thought about it but I assume it's just a direct translation of mé féin etc!
Using 'myself/herself/yourself' etc doesn't sound pompous to me at all, if anything it sounds familiar and friendly but I suppose like anything it depends on the local dialect!

Yes, it’s exactly this in Ireland - a direct translation from Gaeilge.

newtowelsplease · 13/05/2023 16:35

It's not pompous at all in Ireland, it's just the dialect. In England in my experience it's used by people who don't understand grammar and want to make themselves sound intelligent. Unfortunately it has the opposite effect.

CharlottenBerg · 13/05/2023 21:40

Another thing I hate is people meaning say they only have a small role in a big organisation and saying 'I'm only a [small] cog in a [big] wheel'. A cog is a wheel. You're a small cog in a big machine.

Oldnproud · 14/05/2023 15:28

CharlottenBerg · 13/05/2023 21:40

Another thing I hate is people meaning say they only have a small role in a big organisation and saying 'I'm only a [small] cog in a [big] wheel'. A cog is a wheel. You're a small cog in a big machine.

But strictly speaking - or so a quick Google search has suggested - a cog is actually one of the sticking-out teeth on a wheel, which does give meaning to the saying, doesn't it?

CharlottenBerg · 14/05/2023 15:44

Oldnproud · 14/05/2023 15:28

But strictly speaking - or so a quick Google search has suggested - a cog is actually one of the sticking-out teeth on a wheel, which does give meaning to the saying, doesn't it?

Hmmm... I did a quick Google search, and it seems that, depending on the dictionary, a cog can either be a bar or wheel with teeth on the edge, and these engage with other toothed bars or wheels as part of a machine, or also (I didn't know) the teeth themselves. In the second meaning, I'd have thought it would be 'a cog on a wheel', but I admit it's not as clear-cut as I imagined.

ASGIRC · 14/05/2023 15:52

Diorama1 · 12/05/2023 11:58

I know I make this mistake frequently. I have tried to understand when to use me, myself and I correctly but I cant get my head around it. I am educated to masters level and have a professional qualification but honestly this stumps me (or I/myself!!). Can someone explain it in clear language and not use words like nominative, reflexive etc because that is not clear language :)?

Common examples of where I stuggle are:
when I am giving a list of people that attended a meeting and I am on that list, is it: myself, John, Mary, etc or John, Mary and me/I?
Please contact John and me/ myself and John?
Mary and I are going for coffee, myself and Mary are going for coffee.

I hate when I am speaking and this comes up as I know I always pause to consider which is correct and I am probably getting it wrong.

You should only use myself when it is something youve done:

I baked the cake myself
I washed myself
I pissed myself laughing.
No other ways! Never as a replacement of me or I!

As for me or I, I was taught a very simple rule - remove the other person!

So is it John and I went to the cinema or John and me went to the cinema?
Imagine John doesnt exist!
So I went to the cinema. And then add John in to the sentence. John and I went to the cinema.

Daisy bought flowers for John and me or for John and I?
No John!
Daisy bought flowers for me! Not for I!
So when I add John in, it becomes Daisy bought flowers for John and me!

So basically, just ignore the other people in the sentence and build it as if it was for you alone, then add them!
And never use myself, unless you are discribing something you have done yourself.

ASGIRC · 14/05/2023 15:57

PedantScorner · 12/05/2023 15:29

Oxford commas have their place.
Less for fewer grates on me.

I love oxford commas! They make the sentence more elegant and it usually makes more sense!

CarolinaInTheMorning · 14/05/2023 16:03

ASGIRC · 14/05/2023 15:57

I love oxford commas! They make the sentence more elegant and it usually makes more sense!

I agree. I always use the serial comma unless I am forced to follow a particular style guide that indicates otherwise.

Oldnproud · 14/05/2023 16:03

CharlottenBerg · 14/05/2023 15:44

Hmmm... I did a quick Google search, and it seems that, depending on the dictionary, a cog can either be a bar or wheel with teeth on the edge, and these engage with other toothed bars or wheels as part of a machine, or also (I didn't know) the teeth themselves. In the second meaning, I'd have thought it would be 'a cog on a wheel', but I admit it's not as clear-cut as I imagined.

Well, I can't disagree with you there - to me too it would make more sense for the smal cog to be 'on' a big wheel, too, but as there are quite a few possible permutations of cogs/wheels, it really doesnt bother me 😁

Oldnproud · 14/05/2023 16:20

Totally unnecessary and meaningless commas annoy me.

I've noticed an increasing number of people putting one between subject and verb.

For example:

They said, they were going out.
My inlaws, call in all the time.
Daisy, bought flowers for John and me.
(I have made those up, but they are typical of the sort of thing I keep seeing)

Why?

I tend to think (while admitting that my own English grammar is not perfect) that commas are rather like apostrophes: if in doubt, leave them out, as too few is generally better than too many.