I'm a bit confused tbh. I'm a sahm due to the fact we'd be worse off as I work due to my profession being so underpaid and undervalued.
Admittedly Ds doesn't qualify for any nursery subsidies yet, so I'm looking after a toddler 24/7 but my day kind of revolves around him.
I know how important the early years are and if D's was at nursery he'd have to be provided with experiences to help him meet the eyfs goals, so I structure my time around that. That obviously means I'm facilitating and interacting with him, providing experiences etc so I don't have free time.
I kind of go on the philosophy of what would a paid childcare worker be expected to provide?
I do housework when I set up independent play in the same room, I cook with him and try and keep the house habitable, it keeps me busy enough.
If I had the luxury of nursery hours, unless it was literally 30 hours, I'd probably fill it with the housework I have to do a.bit slap dash whilst entertaining a toddler.
With all due respect, I'm not sure you can describe yourself as a sahm if your time is freed up to the extent you are bored by childcare.
I'd classify you as a housewife, which is a very different thing.
But you've provided people with a perfect opportunity to bash sahms. I don't judge, envy or feel superior to my working friends. If I do my job properly, it should all balance out. I do wish those of my friends who want to be sahp could do so, but just as it makes sense for me to do my own childcare, financially they are better off in work.