Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What’s a subtle sign that a person is a good person?

263 replies

YouAreNotBatman · 17/10/2022 21:03

As in you can just tell they are good people in an average situation.

OP posts:
Vegay · 17/10/2022 22:58

@kerstina love ya 👌.

RealFeminist · 17/10/2022 22:58

I think most people can be a bit shitty sometimes and amazing sometimes to greater or lesser degrees. Excluding really extreme examples.

So there's no one way of being and no one way of knowing. Lots of chance, context and variables.

People who are deeply good are often quiet, good listeners, and very relaxed. In my experience. And very rare.

BadNomad · 17/10/2022 22:58

RealFeminist · 17/10/2022 22:53

I'd actually argue the exact opposite. We all have capacity to be wonderfully 'good' and terribly 'bad'. Unless you believe in some kind of immortal soul, I suppose, what else determines our goodness than our actions?

Because some actions have motives. Look at Jimmy Saville. Visiting kids in hospital, giving to charity, smiley and friendly. Would you say he was good because he did good things?

MarieIVanArkleStinks · 17/10/2022 22:59

You can't. The human condition is far more complex than good people/bad people. There is good and bad in everyone. And given the right (or wrong) variables, I suspect a great many things we'd never even imagine ourselves capable of, are possible for anyone.

I know this isn't a popular view.

Petros9 · 17/10/2022 22:59

Well spotted. That's an important one.

takealettermsjones · 17/10/2022 23:02

People who compliment others behind their backs.

Nomorefuckstogive · 17/10/2022 23:02

AffIt · 17/10/2022 21:27

No: it's about the small things.

It's not about what something is (i.e. it doesn't matter if they're Louboutins or Primark), but if somebody looks after the tiny, minor, small things in their life, such as cleaning their shoes, then they're more likely to look to / after the bigger things.

Obviously, this is not a rigorously tested scientific theory with fully endorsed peer reviews, but I've found it to be a reasonably good indicator over the years.

I agree with this. It’s about making an effort, spending time on things and people. Old, but well looked after shoes are an indicator of someone decent IMO. They would also take care of a person, in my experience, Obviously, clean shoes in a social situation, rather than a country walk!

FarmGirl78 · 17/10/2022 23:04

They call them sandwiches and not butties.

JOKE!!

sourcreampringle · 17/10/2022 23:04

UWhatNow · 17/10/2022 21:39

Oh thank God for your post - I know loads of people perfectly good at the social smooze and appearing to be smiley and benevolent who were absolute rotten to the core - tight fisted bullies, and social climbers.

It’s actions that matter. Look at the kind, quietly generous people who go about making things happen without need of social adoration or ego stroking.

Yes all of the really charming, overly lovely, charismatic people who really seem to pull others in that I’ve met have turned out to be pretty evil 😅

DaughterofDawn · 17/10/2022 23:06

I watch how that talk to and about other people. If they gossip, talk negatively about others when the situation does not call for it or just because they are going through a hard time, or if they are prejudiced against other races or women then that’s my clue they aren’t gonna be kind to me the second things go short. I broke up with a lot of boyfriends because of the way they talked about their exes/mothers/sisters. Calling them bitches, constantly blaming the break ups on them and never admitting that part of the blame could have been on them. Not being understanding about women related issues such as unplanned pregnancies.

And how they treat animals is a huge one as others have said. My dad was abusive and he loved kicking dogs and cats. It gave him some kind of high and he said it was his way of establishing “dominance”. He was a horrible fucking person and I was always horrified when a i saw him do that and watched how he laughed. I still get angry thinking about it. Lack of empathy towards helpless animals reflects a lack of empathy towards helpless humans.

Vegay · 17/10/2022 23:07

Honest and true to their word.

I do get a little frustrated with people who 'love' animals, yet continue to consume them. It's called cognitive dissonance. I was that person once. It's like feeling like a hypocrite.

maddy68 · 17/10/2022 23:08

What their friends and family say

Julia234 · 17/10/2022 23:09

The way somebody treats somebody they don’t know. Either meeting for them first time or vaguely knows them, if they are inclusive and friendly, I always find these people to be genuinely good people. On the other hand, if they are stand offish, uninterested or just unfriendly with new people, I instantly know they’re not particularly pleasant people.

shedwithivy · 17/10/2022 23:09

StopFeckingFaffing · 17/10/2022 21:17

They don't treat people differently depending on how important they may or may not be

Good one..

Although I think a lot of the posts about people who are good conversationalists/listeners etc doesn't necessarily mean they are better people than those who are socially awkward or struggle with conversation.

ThatBliddyWoman · 17/10/2022 23:09

OoooohMatron · 17/10/2022 21:12

Wasn't Hitler a vegetarian? Agree about cruelty to animals though.

No he bliddy wasn't and Ive been sick of seeing/hearing people say he was since the birth of the internet (and possibly before)!

I agree the being inclusive of everyone, making sure people are paid attention to in conversations.
In a similar vein, people who will adapt to include people (not beyond boundaries obviously but people who consider people, explain things well, adapt their language etc in a group setting for example).

Nomorefuckstogive · 17/10/2022 23:12

Really listening to someone. General kindness and checking in on someone. Empathy, not sympathy.

Backtoblack1 · 17/10/2022 23:12

Empathy for animals and others in general.

lingle · 17/10/2022 23:13

Without time/adversity to test them, these signs are worthless (except their friends)

LeMoo · 17/10/2022 23:14

Dont bitch about people behind theirs backs or delivery backhanded compliments - all done behind smiles and faux niceness.

Usually a good indication.

DogsDryWineAndCheese · 17/10/2022 23:14

They don’t virtue signal

CellarBellaatemycoal · 17/10/2022 23:18

I’m not sure about the idea that looking after the small things (clean shoes for example) is an indicator they look after the big things?
I have a tendency to be attracted to be friends who are less fussy over small things. Their toddler may be unkempt but happy, they’ll have crumbs on the kitchen floor, bobbly jumpers, worn /patched up clothes, mad hair… drive an old car etc.
I guess we’re all just wired differently when it comes to how we suss people out. Of course there’s some sort of inverse snobbery at play here because I’d quite like them to have a nice bookshelf too 😀
But generally I’m a bit wary of people who obsess over keeping stuff immaculate.
I’d be horrified at anyone who was horrible to waiting staff though, that’s a good indicator of a baddie. Good manners are important.

RealFeminist · 17/10/2022 23:19

BadNomad · 17/10/2022 22:58

Because some actions have motives. Look at Jimmy Saville. Visiting kids in hospital, giving to charity, smiley and friendly. Would you say he was good because he did good things?

No. I'd say that the idea of a 'good' or a 'bad' person is wildly oversimplifying the vast majority of cases.

There are a few horrors and yes Saville was one but if we are talking everyday people you meets we are mostly a big old mix of a bit craps a bit good, and lots indifferent. It'd be meaningless to try and sort most people into one of 2 reductive categories.

CandyLeBonBon · 17/10/2022 23:21

Lots of people thought Jimmy Savile was 'good' because he was a prolific raiser of funds for charity. I've no idea if he was a a clean-shoe-wearing vegetarian, but if he was, it still didn't make him a good person.

A lot of these examples are so subjective. I don't always have clean shoes. Ive lost touch with friends over the years, for various reasons and I eat meat, I'm still an inherently good person, even though I cock things up.

I'm always worried about threads like this, because actually what most are describing is the female socialisation/accommodation, often to the detriment of ourselves - always putting others first etc.

But tl:dr - simply clean shoes and vegetarianism do not a good person make!

PriOn1 · 17/10/2022 23:22

DogsDryWineAndCheese · 17/10/2022 23:14

They don’t virtue signal

Unlike all the vegans on this thread?

”I do get a little frustrated with people who 'love' animals, yet continue to consume them. It's called cognitive dissonance. I was that person once. It's like feeling like a hypocrite.”

Has it ever crossed your mind that some people might have assessed the way meat is produced and come to a different conclusion from yours.

I eat meat and work hard to ensure it’s produced humanely. That is literally what my job entails. I have absolutely no cognitive dissonance over my decision.

Boudica66 · 17/10/2022 23:24

kerstina · 17/10/2022 21:07

My personal view. If they are good to animals and don’t eat them . On the other end of the scale people who abuse animals are often the same with children . Evil.

I eat chicken, I'm a serial killer

Swipe left for the next trending thread