Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not go back full time - ever?

374 replies

Geeseflying · 12/10/2022 17:17

DH and I have one child. I work three days a week.

I don’t like my job but I can just about bear it for three days. If I had to do it for five I would be miserable.

The obvious answer is to get a job I do like for five days. But I am a teacher. Even if I could find something that paid equivalent it would leave us with holidays to cover.

So AIBU to stay PT once DS is school age?

OP posts:
NutbushShittyLimits · 15/10/2022 09:18

I can see how p/t works in a secondary, and maybe even in years 5 & 6. I don’t see how it successfully works reception - year 4 where the DC have the same teacher for most subjects.

Geeseflying · 15/10/2022 09:25

I am in it, but I’m not really looking to get out.

OP posts:
Firstshoes · 15/10/2022 09:33

I work 3.5 days, just 7 hours short of full time. We are not rolling in it by any means but get by. Those 7 hours keep me sane. I have more time for my teenage dcs who need me far more emotionally than they did and more time for housework/house admin. I cut back on things for myself so I can stay part time. It is so important to me. I am lucky though as I know some peoe have literally no choice but to work full-time !

MarvellousMonsters · 15/10/2022 09:42

100% YANBU

If you can afford to work pt then do it. If you go full time your child will spend more time in school/afterschool club etc than at home. You will spend your evenings and weekend doing cleaning & laundry instead of spending time with your child. It's not a life, it's a constant scrabble to stay on top of chores.

I think both parents working 4 days a week is a great idea, both parents get to do school runs and can split the domestic admin, without a serious drop in income. It's all part of the patriarchal bullshit to assume it's always mothers who reduce paid work whilst dads carry on like they have no children. Until both parents changing hours to be more family friendly is normal women will continue to suffer career damage for having children whilst men don't.

But no, you absolutely don't need to go back full time once your child is in school.

grlwhowrites · 15/10/2022 10:10

YANBU. Speak to your DH and discuss all the benefits of you remaining part time (including saving on childcare costs) and hopefully he’ll be honest with you about his genuine feelings, and you can make a decision together.
I don’t know why anyone would choose to work full time if they could afford not to. I hate working full time; I’m constantly exhausted and at least one day of the weekend is spent catching up on life admin and cleaning. I’m a few decades off retirement and honestly, I’m wishing my life away just to get to a point where I’ll have more freedom.

GrumpyMummy123 · 15/10/2022 10:23

I have 1 DS. In Junior school. I work PT/term time only, but not in the classroom. I wouldn't change being PT for anything. I also don't think I could cope with being in front of the kids more than about an hour a week, OMG it is absolutely exhausting and draining. I think everyone should try it - teachers need the emphathy!!!

I recently applied and was offered a PT/ 52 weeks job that in many ways would have been much 'better' than my current job. But after much deliberation I didn't want to give up my time with DS. He will be our one and only DC and I don't want to miss anything. I love picking him up from school, taking him to his clubs and having the time to chat and listen to him. I like having his friends over to play after school and all that stuff. It's not a chore, it's great (most of the time!)

DH has the job that pays the mortgage and for us to live. Mine tops it up to be more comfortable. He often has to go away with work and have meetings at all hours due to international nature. He can give everything he needs to the job. I take care of all the school and club admin, housework, groceries etc. And we still have time in the evenings and at weekends to do fun family stuff together. For us, our personal preference is to live life in the now. Yes we have pensions, small savings, comfortable but not massive house, have a holiday most years but nothing exotic etc. We don't want to slog our guts out now just to save for 20years time or feel the need to strive to upgrade our current lifestyle. What if we get hit by a bus tomorrow. We want to enjoy life now. Our priority is spending time together. I think it's finding the right balance for yourself though.

With my work pattern once a week DH has to do breakfast club drop off and After school club pickup. It's only once a week and often I'm back in time to do pickup anyway, but never know until it's end of the day if I can get away. But sometimes when he's away or late meetings he just can't do it and it's me that has to grovel to my boss to flex my time to manage it. I'm thankful that my job just isn't as 'important'. It's pain in the ass having to try to leave early to do pick up, but it's not the end of the world. I wouldn't to do more hours if it'd add more of that sort of stress - it's just not worth. DH really appreciates not having to worry it more than 1 day a week. It works for us.

But I do also appreciate different people have other priorities and situations. If DH didn't have the wage he had, if I had a career or skill that I wanted to utilize. If I found looking after DS a slog and preferred being at work. If the cost of living keeps going up maybe my priorities will change and I'll be begging my boss for more hours. Who knows!

If you can afford to not go full time I'd definitely stay PT absolutely, no question!

Foxgluv · 15/10/2022 10:32

Don't do something that will make you miserable if you can help it (especially teaching)

If you can afford to remain part time then absolutely, remain part time.

Ange211 · 15/10/2022 11:03

I didn’t go back full time…I sort of planned to but then didn’t 🤣 we can afford for me to work pt so I do 🤷‍♀️
if you can afford it go for it. Nice to have a day or two to yourself for some downtime. I enjoy being able to meet a fiend for lunch, go a big walk, tackle and area of the house that need attention, do some life admin etc etc without guilt of ignoring my children.

Panauchocolat25 · 15/10/2022 12:22

I actually love teaching and being in the classroom, it's my favourite part of the job. So it's not true that teachers hate their job and it's not fair on the kids if they don't want to be there.
If it was just teaching I would easily work full time. But it's all the extra stuff - marking, emails, admin, planning, reports, meetings, cpd etc which have to be done mostly in your own time (evenings, weekends). That's the reason I decided to go part time so I could get some evenings and weekends back!

Annoyingkidsmusic · 15/10/2022 15:50

switswoo81 · 12/10/2022 17:21

Maybe not what you asked but if you can don't like your job and you can only bear a few days then you should think about a change of career. Children deserve to be taught by someone who wants to be there .

I agree with this.

Tallulasdancingshoes · 15/10/2022 16:16

100% YANBU! I’m a secondary head of department and work 3 days. Dh is a primary head. My dc are now 10 and 7 and there’s no way I’m going back full time. I only just about manage to keep on top of stuff doing 3 days a week. The house would be in total chaos, the kids homework wouldn’t be done, they’d have to give up some activities because we couldn’t manage it/get them there and no one would ever eat anything and I’d be doing schoolwork on the weekends rather than in my days off. Dh does as much as he can but is insanely busy. It’s not just a case of doing less work when you’re a head, so I definitely do the lions share at home. I would personally stay part time for as long as you can afford it. With teaching there is so much to do outside of school hours, full time would be too much.

99victoria · 15/10/2022 16:29

I understand that you need to make a certain amount of money and that you can do that by teaching part-time but you say you 'hate' your job. You really need to think seriously about whether it's fair on the children you teach for you to continue to do it. I believe that children deserve passionate and committed teachers - they only get one chance at education and they deserve the best. If you don't have any passion for teaching then do something else!

ToooMuchToDo · 15/10/2022 16:32

If you don't like your job, leave and find one you do like. My son has two teachers - one teaches 2.5 days, and the other teachers the other 2.5 days. He can definitely tell that the second teacher would rather not be there. That is detrimental for him and his friends, and means he also would rather not be at school on those days. This is not great for primary age.

Just leave. The kids will be happier and you'll b happier. You don't need to go full time, just find a better part time job.

Fairislefandango · 15/10/2022 16:51

I do think some people seem to underestimate how many men probably really like not having to take responsibility for housework, childcare and household admin, and being able to go off to work without a thought for anything family-related. Obviously that's not at all a reason that women should be SAHMs or PT, but it may be a very good reason why they shouldn't be made to feel they are taking the piss or 'getting a free ride'.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 15/10/2022 16:57

I think it's absolutely fine for you to stay part time forever if you can afford it and if your DH is happy with that arrangement. I do absolutely think he needs to be supportive of the plan - you don't have any automatic right to work part time unless you're able to contribute equally to the family financially on your part time salary.

Of course, if your DH expects you to work full time, then he also needs to pick up his fair share of all the other stuff. That would have to be split 50/50, and he would need to totally accept that shared responsibility.

The default position for any couple has to be that you split all responsibilities equally - childcare, housework, providing for the family. No capable adult has the right to opt out of any of those responsibilities and just demand that their partner picks up the slack. However, if you are able to agree a different division of labour between you, then crack on. All that matters is that it suits both of you. Everyone else's opinion is irrelevant.

Geeseflying · 15/10/2022 17:03

It’s so strange how many people want and need passion from their childrens teachers. Professionalism and good, thorough teaching isn’t enough - only absolute passion is acceptable.

OP posts:
red4321 · 15/10/2022 17:12

It’s so strange how many people want and need passion from their childrens teachers. Professionalism and good, thorough teaching isn’t enough - only absolute passion is acceptable.

Don't worry, plenty of us take a rather more pragmatic view. Very happy with an organised, professional teacher. I couldn't teach for love nor money (which isn't that high relative to other careers) so credit to those that do.

I'm also slightly bemused when parents think their child must be an utter joy to teach. Particularly if they're anything like the slightly arsey teenagers I have to endure every day at home.

WombatChocolate · 15/10/2022 17:37

FAIRISLEFANDANGO, I think I agree that many men really like the fact that when a woman is sort time, they don’t have to give much thought to home/childcare/domestic stuff. They might still do some if this stuff, but somehow, when a woman is part-time, the thinking and engaging with these issues and working them out, all falls to the woman. In fact, even for women who work full time, and wheee the men might DO a fair amount if the home stuff when instructed, it’s usually the woman who thinks it all through and has the mental burden of it all.

Men seem to be more able to walk off to work and not think about whether the pick-up has been arranged a no a costume for the play next day sorted….they just assume the other adult has sorted that stuff. Women are much less likely to feel they can assume that.

It’s partly this mental burden that leads women to work part time. When they are full time, they also do more if the domestic stuff and eta the mental burden of the planning of it all, even if not all the practical stuff. People forget that. And when women work part time, they usually fully take on all that mental burden and almost or all of the domestic practical burden….leaving men free to think purely about their jobs during work hours and to be ‘free’ of burdens when they don’t work…in a way women never are, but always feel some kind of responsibility.

My DH is generally v good. He does all kinds of domestic tasks and childcare…..if I ask him. He rarely takes the initiative or plans ahead, but waits for me to tell him what to do. He doesn’t worry about future schools, clubs etc. We’ve spoken about this and he tells me he doesn’t worry as he knows I’m thinking about the stuff. But what if I don’t want to think about the stuff? If I wasn’t there, he would think about and plan that stuff..because he would have to, but like most men, he simply assumes that I will do it. Have I encouraged that and ‘allowed’ it or is it part of some kind of systemic patriarchy? Probably a bit of both.

I wonder when women work full time and the man part time, if the man fully takes in the mental burden if home and child decisions or if the woman holds onto much of that too? I suspect they do? Is it that women are control freaks? Or is it that men have through history simply walked away from that stuff and it’s not inbuilt to feel responsibility for the decision making on it? Interesting stuff. I suspect that we are far more socially conditioned than we think and the patriarchy History had more hold on us than we imagine and like to think about. Most of us like to think our set-up is purely chosen based on ways suits our family and makes everyone happy. It’s true to a point, but our assumptions and feelings about work, being at home, the mental burden are all shaped by history.

Is it that women wanted it all and quickly found that having it all was just too much and that something has to give….with women choosing different elements to ‘give up’. However, perhaps men never wanted it all. They’d got things worked out how they liked them. Going to work suited them and leaving the other stuff to women worked well for them because they weren’t that interested in that stuff. When women started working too, that was great as an added bonus of meaning that there was more cash and less financial pressure on them….but at the same time, although stepping up a bit domestically, they never really properly took on the responsibility for domsectic and child stuff, leaving that to women. And the women continue to insist that they want that responsibility and don’t want to have it taken from them….so men can say ‘who am I to argue with that’. In lots of ways. Women are their own worst enemies, trying to have it all, but bearing the cost of everything too which is too much and pushes many ultimately to be part time, as a way to cope.

Tallulasdancingshoes · 15/10/2022 18:13

@WombatChocolate you've hit the nail on the head. My dh is the same. He’ll do what I ask him to, but rarely takes the initiative himself and that is part of the reason for staying part-time. I just simply do not have the brain space to do my job job full-time and think about everything else.

Ideatcakeforbreakfast · 15/10/2022 21:06

If you can afford to and you really don't want to then don't. I'm also a teacher but I went back full-time when my son was 3 - 1 because of the money and 2 - because I found I was basically doing a full-time job on part-time hours and it was more tiring. I am less tired and more in a routine working 5 days a week and I now work in a school where management are more supportive of working parents which helps.

red4321 · 16/10/2022 08:40

you've hit the nail on the head. My dh is the same. He’ll do what I ask him to, but rarely takes the initiative himself and that is part of the reason for staying part-time. I just simply do not have the brain space to do my job job full-time and think about everything else.

Same here. He's a good dad but just doesn't have a handle on the detail.

Words were had this week as I've been working, my son was off school ill all week and my husband was out for dinner until 1am the night before our holiday then left at 6am for a golf day. Leaving me to get everything ready for the holiday on my own, while also trying to work and look after my son.

It's the logistics around the kids and house that I find frustrating. He'll book in work events without checking first and if I happen not to be around as I'm sorting out one of the kids, it's on me to organise childcare for the other one, lifts etc. Must be very freeing just to do what you want!

Zone2NorthLondon · 19/10/2022 18:58

I read this a lot in mn. Women married to hapless men who apparently can’t parent. These men apparently Hold down responsible jobs but cannot be relied upon to parent, so guess what… woman has to do it all and hey! It’s easier to be part time to get all the family duties done.
oh come on. Wakey wakey. These are adults who hold external roles and cope, Men choosing not to engage as parents.They’ll happily financially contribute and work FT but will sidestep parenting knowing the woman will go part time.

DillDanding · 19/10/2022 19:15

I tend to think these useless blokes have been enabled, first by their own family dynamic and then later by their wives.

Zone2NorthLondon · 19/10/2022 19:19

DillDanding · 19/10/2022 19:15

I tend to think these useless blokes have been enabled, first by their own family dynamic and then later by their wives.

Yes of course, it’s not a global men thing. It’s a that man thing. He’s a chancer
These hapless parent men are simply taking the piss they know the partner will step up. They manoeuvre self out of responsibility by acting hapless, in return for FT working they get minimal responsibility. I don’t believe all these clueless hapless men really exist, they’re making an actual active choice to disengage in return for financial contribution

New posts on this thread. Refresh page